[QUOTE=RichD;467676]I was referring to [url=http://www.factordb.com/sequences.php?se=1&aq=4788&action=range&fr=12501&to=12501]AS 4788:12501[/url] which has a C195 blocker and a total size of 199.
Unless there is something wrong with FDB I am not aware of.[/QUOTE]

Create time April 20th. Certainly seems like a while.

Ah, my mistake.

[SPOILER]That old sequence is certainly worthy of moving from one 2^2 · 3 · 7 iteration to another 2^2 · 3 · 7 iteration.
Just like the other one is worthy of moving from one 2 · 3 iteration to another 2 · 3.
Both equally worthy, for sure.[/SPOILER]

ok, in the first step I'll run all curves up to 43e6.

[QUOTE=yoyo;467686]ok, in the first step I'll run all curves up to 43e6.[/QUOTE]

it is quite possible that ryanp has already run the necessary ecm before abandoning the sequence.

[QUOTE=yoyo;467686]ok, in the first step I'll run all curves up to 43e6.[/QUOTE]

As second step I'll run all 110e6 curves.

[QUOTE=yoyo;467893]As second step I'll run all 110e6 curves.[/QUOTE]

I run now all 260e6 curves.
Is afterwards more needed?

[QUOTE=yoyo;468440]I run now all 260e6 curves.
Is afterwards more needed?[/QUOTE]

Bayesian says, given 18000 curves @ 110e6:
[CODE]3400 curves with B1 = 850.0e6
4800 curves with B1 = 2.9e9[/CODE]

And what does it say after 42000 curves @260e6?
Where can I see what it say?

[QUOTE=yoyo;468473]And what does it say after 42000 curves @260e6?
Where can I see what it say?[/QUOTE]

After 42000 @ 260e6, it wants:[CODE]2800 curves with B1 = 2.9e9[/CODE]

It's a script that was put up on the forum by someone (Xilman, maybe?). If you search around for Bayesian or ecm-toy, you should find it. Make sure you also get the ecm-times generating script as well. It'll produce the timings needed for the ecm-toy script to do calculations properly.

I believe it was fivemack's creation.

[url]http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=21420[/url]

This should be the correct thread. And yes, it was Fivemack's creation. My apologies. :smile: