[QUOTE=unconnected;453449]No progress from Jan 18, did Ryan still working on it?[/QUOTE]

I'm taking a break for now and handing this one back to the forum for the time being. :sad:

Do my eyes deceive me or is this train rolling again?

A little bit. BTW, C142 is ready for GNFS.

Only 68 terms needed to become the new record sequence (in terms of length)! :smile:

With 68 terms more, with the current driver and without losing the 3, it will grow about 19 digits in size too, therefore it will not only be the length record, but also (at 196+19=215 digits) one "absolute" record.

I'll take this a bit further to see if we can avoid that fate. :smile:

GNFS for the c184 blocker is underway.

:bow: We wish we had your hardware...

C195 blocker this time.

There hasn't been any recent activity. Any ECM work? Perhaps yoyo can help get things started.

[QUOTE=RichD;467630]There hasn't been any recent activity. [/QUOTE]
Hmmm. I'd say factoring a c210 was a pretty damn good activity.
...and sort of recent, too. (Dated [URL="http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000000968464113"]Sep. 12[/URL].)

[QUOTE=Batalov;467665]Hmmm. I'd say factoring a c210 was a pretty damn good activity.
...and sort of recent, too. (Dated [URL="http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000000968464113"]Sep. 12[/URL].)[/QUOTE]

I was referring to [url=http://www.factordb.com/sequences.php?se=1&aq=4788&action=range&fr=12501&to=12501]AS 4788:12501[/url] which has a C195 blocker and a total size of 199.
Unless there is something wrong with FDB I am not aware of.