![]() |
[CODE]Input number is 2317782814450051052073047195769465050354001952101721902529829350520426985336704129030974530507567521691595773402817891488419330746034874391364516540246822333 (157 digits)
Using B1=110000000, B2=776278396540, polynomial Dickson(30), sigma=2180346194 Step 1 took 404375ms Step 2 took 117108ms ********** Factor found in step 2: 203155870027420948175076099054300939654790520657784481 Found probable prime factor of 54 digits: 203155870027420948175076099054300939654790520657784481 Probable prime cofactor 11408889214656748496525154991349154907880685993630229044952057384741921732760164716438694300740786017693 has 104 digits [/CODE] |
[QUOTE=Batalov;358031][CODE]Input number is 2317782814450051052073047195769465050354001952101721902529829350520426985336704129030974530507567521691595773402817891488419330746034874391364516540246822333 (157 digits)
Using B1=110000000, B2=776278396540, polynomial Dickson(30), sigma=2180346194 Step 1 took 404375ms Step 2 took 117108ms ********** Factor found in step 2: 203155870027420948175076099054300939654790520657784481 Found probable prime factor of 54 digits: 203155870027420948175076099054300939654790520657784481 Probable prime cofactor 11408889214656748496525154991349154907880685993630229044952057384741921732760164716438694300740786017693 has 104 digits [/CODE][/QUOTE]Two in a row! :bow: :bow: |
A few more than two, actually, -- the iteration is 5185 now (size 183).
|
Batalov, do you need help running the seq or do you prefer working alone?
|
I guess I should tell my machines to stop working on that c170...:smile:
I only had these many curves done: [code] 60@2e3 296@11e3 963@5e4 1620@25e4 2560@1e6 4800@3e6 4520@11e6 7120@43e6 372@11e7 [/code]Moving to whatever's next... unless Batalov does wish to run with it a while... |
c147 is almost done.
|
Batalov, what hardware are you running that ECM on? Just curious for curve execution time comparison. Thanks!
|
[QUOTE=wombatman;358064]Batalov, what hardware are you running that ECM on? Just curious for curve execution time comparison. Thanks![/QUOTE]
Some pretty standard (maybe even a bit old) 2800-3000MHz Intel CPUs. |
Strange. Mine is much slower on a Core i7 processor, even with a 64-bit compilation. Are you on linux?
|
The c158 is ready for GNFS. (The sequence is released.)
|
Polynomial requested [URL="http://mersenneforum.org/showpost.php?p=358417&postcount=327"]here[/URL].
|
| All times are UTC. The time now is 23:10. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.