[QUOTE=Dubslow;294947]I did check, and they were only 15 minutes apart. (22:41 OP time to 22:56 edit, local.) On the other hand, I'm only getting ~100 curves/hour, and I'll certainly be asleep before they finish (even if I put all cores to ECM) so I think I'll stop them. 108@11e6 total.[/QUOTE]Ooops, you're right, only 15 minutes. I guess I had a spot of lysdexia there when I first posted..... Anyway, as Batalov said, he'll have the composite cracked overnight, or you could get a lucky strike if you leave your cores running overnight, so it works out either way.

At some point in the future, yoyo, you'll probably want to add a program for GPU-based (CUDA) ECM stage 1: GPU-based ECM stage 1 is still a bit experimental, but it can easily be faster than CPU-based ECM stage 1 :smile:

Done. Next is c122, will do too.

Found 191405798636855843004221761290694956491

Edit: Doing curves at 11M on i2967 c147
Edit: started 2k@44M Edit: done

320 @ B1=3e6 run about one hour ago on the C147, no factors.

We would need 7000 43e6 and a poly.
I started some 43e6s.

[QUOTE=Batalov;295005]We would need 7000 43e6 and a poly.
I started some 43e6s.[/QUOTE]

I'll pitch in 1500 or so.

[QUOTE=Batalov;295005]We would need 7000 43e6 and a poly.[/QUOTE]
I'll do a poly.

I got 2000 43e6 curves so far.

[code][color=blue]# sieve with ggnfs lasieve4 I14e on alg side from Q=7M to 27M[/color]
# est ~29M raw relations (avg. 0.076 sec/rel C2D @ 3.4GHz)
# aq4788:2967
n: 567746316848227719111860052856667016141850239422163555754828515183571870488144523015718273810311420088795603432504527683259281602401200098277168889
# norm 3.480086e-14 alpha -7.514387 e 8.937e-12 rroots 3
skew: 891138.51
c0: -60850644996746054783095313237136821
c1: -501129049682078747856998866287
c2: 1622606630412589648404364
c3: 2854893119141293902
c4: -1419913202228
c5: 322920
Y0: -17742382838270665370902251942
Y1: 3238487805878041
rlim: 14000000
alim: 14000000
lpbr: 28
lpba: 28
mfbr: 56
mfba: 56
rlambda: 2.5
alambda: 2.5
[/code]

Does one of the usual suspects want to make a unilateral sieve, or should RSALS do that ? :smile: