![]() |
Attempting 7M-8M to see what happens...
edit: BTW +1000 more @ 11e6 (total 5000) |
Oops. I forgot to report the p52 from iteration 2846 to Paul Zimmermann for his 2012 top ten ECM factors list. I guess it will drop out of the top ten in a few days.
|
OK, I completed 7M-8M, turning up ~1.65M relations. I'll take 8-10M now to play with further.
I have several machines still running ecm @ 11e6 and have totalled up ~7500. At this point is B1=11e6 a futile search? |
Yes, B1=11M is futile now.
|
The [strike]c144[/strike] (Edit: that's [B]c147[/B]) is done. The next 3 lines fell to ECM easily. Currently at i2906 on a [URL="http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000000488319639"]c144[/URL]. I've completed 904 B1=1M curves. I'm not planning to run B1=3M curves right now.
|
I have turned loose several slow cores @11e6...
|
I queued some with 43e6 and 110e6.
status -> [url]http://www.rechenkraft.net/yoyo/y_status_ecm.php[/url] |
1800@44M
|
4788:2906-c144: 1000@11e6
4788:2906-c144: +1000@11e6 (2000 total) 4788:2906-c144: +1000@11e6 (3000 total) 4788:2906-c144: +1000@11e6 (4000 total) 4788:2906-c144: +1000@11e6 (5000 total) Is this probably enough @11e6? |
With the yoyo curves, even B1=44M should be futile now. This one is over-due for NFS.
|
[QUOTE=akruppa;288778]With the yoyo curves, even B1=44M should be futile now. This one is over-due for NFS.[/QUOTE]
Yeah, I was thinking of pointing my machines in a different direction, but I don't know if that should be this effort or something else. I can at least supply some help here for a c144 and 4788 interest has seemed to be weak as of late. So, if a "good" poly shows up, I'll do some sieving... |
| All times are UTC. The time now is 23:16. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.