How much ECM has been done on the c162?

Would have been nice to know that 2709 had been factored. Guess I'll kill that GNFS job.

[QUOTE=bsquared;269722]Would have been nice to know that 2709 had been factored. Guess I'll kill that GNFS job.[/QUOTE]
When I saw the factors posted to factordb, I assumed you were the one that finished it. The smaller factor was a p58 so it was probably done via GNFS.

[QUOTE=jrk;269729]When I saw the factors posted to factordb, I assumed you were the one that finished it. The smaller factor was a p58 so it was probably done via GNFS.[/QUOTE]

I was maybe 80% done, but got scooped by someone. It wasn't my electricity though, so I can't be too upset.

[QUOTE=jrk;269729]When I saw the factors posted to factordb, I assumed you were the one that finished it. The smaller factor was a p58 so it was probably done via GNFS.[/QUOTE][QUOTE=bsquared;269742]I was maybe 80% done, but got scooped by someone. It wasn't my electricity though, so I can't be too upset.[/QUOTE]Interesting....so if it wasn't either of you, who was it?

I'm sure we all appreciate the assist; but, as bsquared said, it would be nice to know ahead of time....

I did 3200@43e6 on the c162 - no factors.

+1920@11e7
How much ECM we need?

+2160@11e7

+200@11e7

3200@43e6 + 4380@11e7 is a bit less than 2t50, should we go further ?

[QUOTE=debrouxl;271613]+200@11e7

3200@43e6 + 4380@11e7 is a bit less than 2t50, should we go further ?[/QUOTE]Would someone like to run a poly search?

[QUOTE=schickel;272377]Would someone like to run a poly search?[/QUOTE]
I posted a poly for this composite earlier in this thread. On August 21.