mersenneforum.org

mersenneforum.org (https://www.mersenneforum.org/index.php)
-   Aliquot Sequences (https://www.mersenneforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=90)
-   -   Aliquot sequence reservations (https://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=11588)

legendarymudkip 2014-10-28 19:54

Dropping 823176 (Currently C95, 2^2*3*5*7 are small factors.)

fivemack 2014-11-03 23:43

Taking 768612 893352

unconnected 2014-11-04 14:58

Taking 428928 and 914788.

Batalov 2014-11-04 18:30

[QUOTE=fivemack;385510]Do not put sequences with cofactors less than C116 into the database, even with reservations, since some kind of worker thread will pick them up and keep running them.[/QUOTE]
I have run several tests (including leaving a couple of baits - the downdrivers - in the open) and none of my sequences were moved.

ymmv, of course.

fivemack 2014-11-05 08:30

Taking 113960

Batalov 2014-11-05 22:20

Taking 72492, 112968, 120760, 125016, 167358, 173808, 181980, 198696

richs 2014-11-06 04:37

My downdriver on 230916 was stolen today. It made it all the way down to 8 digits at i2932. I made the mistake of leaving the downdriver in the open when I left for work this morning....

That being said, how does one check to see if a merge has occurred?

schickel 2014-11-06 06:02

[QUOTE=richs;386986]My downdriver on 230916 was stolen today. It made it all the way down to 8 digits at i2932. I made the mistake of leaving the downdriver in the open when I left for work this morning....

That being said, how does one check to see if a merge has occurred?[/QUOTE]If it merged coming back up, it would leap from where you finished off up to whereever the merged/merging sequence was. I'll make a quick check and see if I can tell......BRB!

LaurV 2014-11-06 06:07

If it would have merged, it wouldn't be at 113 digits in fdb. There is no other sequence at 113 digits.

schickel 2014-11-06 06:40

[QUOTE=LaurV;386990]If it would have merged, it wouldn't be at 113 digits in fdb. There is no other sequence at 113 digits.[/QUOTE][Assuming, of course, that the status page was completely up to date.] But you are correct, there was no merge. Really disappointing, it was down at 8 digits for more than just a few steps....[code] 2923 . 194619554 = 2 * 97309777
2924 . 97309780 = 2^2 * 5 * 23 * 211543
2925 . 115926572 = 2^2 * 29 * 911 * 1097
2926 . 94362388 = 2^2 * 31 * 283 * 2689
2927 . 76764652 = 2^2 * 2753 * 6971
2928 . 57641564 = 2^2 * 3559 * 4049
2929 . 43284436 = 2^2 * 13 * 23 * 36191
2930 . 41839148 = 2^2 * 13 * 271 * 2969
2931 . 37329172 = 2^2 * 53 * 176081
2932 . 29229824 = 2^8 * 13 * 8783
2933 . 33610912 = 2^5 * 23 * 45667
2934 . 35439104 = 2^9 * 19 * 3643
2935 . 39117136 = 2^4 * 17 * 143813
2936 . 41131076 = 2^2 * 7 * 1468967
2937 . 41131132 = 2^2 * 7 * 1468969
2938 . 41131188 = 2^2 * 3^2 * 7^3 * 3331
2939 . 80153612 = 2^2 * 7^3 * 11 * 47 * 113
2940 . 103705588 = 2^2 * 7 * 101 * 36671[/code]

LaurV 2014-11-06 07:16

[QUOTE=schickel;386994][Assuming, of course, that the status page was completely up to date.] [/QUOTE]
No need to look to any status page, just to the sequence in discussion on fdb. All of them were over a top, say 116 digits sometime in their past, and in (my, your, Dubslow's etc) database we don't have sequences at 113 digits. Even if the "tables" are not really actual, te sequence in discussion does not exhibit a top over 116 digits after the deep of 8 digits, so it can't be a merge. If it would merge with something, as you personally said, it will jump immediately from "where you left it" to the last top of that "something" (which is over 116 digits) and than (eventually) back at 113. Except if it (unfortunately) merged with a sequence which is "corrupted" in the DB. But that is not the case.

Just to be sure, I also have checked it against my db after I posted (which db is not updated since long time, i.e.since I was talking about it in september or so, but everything is over 115 digits) and didn't find anything.


All times are UTC. The time now is 23:04.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.