Unreserving 383082 952320

I suspect that someone else is calculating these two aliquot sequences.

I'll take them and additional 100 sequences with length 139 :)

There is somthing new cooking at the AllSeq web portal, with sequences above 10[SUP]6[/SUP] showing up now.

[CODE]Sequence Size Index Guide Known Factors Cofactor Size Class Last Updated Recent Progress Reservation
1000564 123 3277 Downdriver! 2 * 19 * C122 122 1 2017-10-31 15:27:54 3278
1000946 126 1467 Downdriver! 2 * 79 * 7604819 * C117 117 1 2017-10-31 16:40:11 1468
1000288 136 1443 Downdriver! 2 * 157 * 21737 * P13 * C117 117 1 2017-10-31 14:54:21 1444
565608 146 741 2^9 * 3 * 31 2^9 * 3 * 31 * 79 * 3533 * C136 136 2 2017-10-30 05:47:12 2017-08-29
250410 147 643 2^9 * 3 * 31 2^9 * 3 * 31 * C143 143 2 2017-10-31 14:17:38 2017-08-17
702688 148 756 2^9 * 3 * 31 2^9 * 3 * 31 * C143 143 2 2017-10-31 11:48:05 2017-10-19
1000126 188 3335 2^9 * 3 * 11 * 31 2^9 * 3 * 11 * 17 * 31 * 1871 * 281069 * 565985201 * C164 164 0 2017-10-31 14:31:36 3336
1000516 188 3350 2^9 * 3 * 11 * 31 2^9 * 3 * 11 * 17 * 31 * 1871 * 281069 * 565985201 * C164 164 0 2017-10-31 15:23:57 3351
1000896 140 2851 2^9 * 3 2^9 * 3^4 * 487 * C133 133 9 2017-10-31 16:38:12 2852
123960 141 1892 2^9 * 3 2^9 * 3 * 13 * C137 137 7 2017-10-29 22:48:50 2017-08-29
...[/CODE]

Note that 1000126 and 1000516 are both obviously merged into 7044.
1000946 is merged into 219804
1000288 is merged into 118020, etc...

Unclear what the purpose of this experiment was.

[QUOTE=Batalov;470669]There is somthing new cooking at the AllSeq web portal, with sequences above 10[SUP]6[/SUP] showing up now.

[CODE]Sequence Size Index Guide Known Factors Cofactor Size Class Last Updated Recent Progress Reservation
1000564 123 3277 Downdriver! 2 * 19 * C122 122 1 2017-10-31 15:27:54 3278
1000946 126 1467 Downdriver! 2 * 79 * 7604819 * C117 117 1 2017-10-31 16:40:11 1468
1000288 136 1443 Downdriver! 2 * 157 * 21737 * P13 * C117 117 1 2017-10-31 14:54:21 1444
565608 146 741 2^9 * 3 * 31 2^9 * 3 * 31 * 79 * 3533 * C136 136 2 2017-10-30 05:47:12 2017-08-29
250410 147 643 2^9 * 3 * 31 2^9 * 3 * 31 * C143 143 2 2017-10-31 14:17:38 2017-08-17
702688 148 756 2^9 * 3 * 31 2^9 * 3 * 31 * C143 143 2 2017-10-31 11:48:05 2017-10-19
1000126 188 3335 2^9 * 3 * 11 * 31 2^9 * 3 * 11 * 17 * 31 * 1871 * 281069 * 565985201 * C164 164 0 2017-10-31 14:31:36 3336
1000516 188 3350 2^9 * 3 * 11 * 31 2^9 * 3 * 11 * 17 * 31 * 1871 * 281069 * 565985201 * C164 164 0 2017-10-31 15:23:57 3351
1000896 140 2851 2^9 * 3 2^9 * 3^4 * 487 * C133 133 9 2017-10-31 16:38:12 2852
123960 141 1892 2^9 * 3 2^9 * 3 * 13 * C137 137 7 2017-10-29 22:48:50 2017-08-29
...[/CODE]

Note that 1000126 and 1000516 are both obviously merged into 7044.
1000946 is merged into 219804
1000288 is merged into 118020, etc...

Unclear what the purpose of this experiment was.[/QUOTE]

Wasn't me!

[CODE]7044 188 3456 2^9 * 3 * 11 * 31 2^9 * 3 * 11 * 17 * 31 * 1871 * 281069 * 565985201 * C164 164 02017-10-30 11:47:14 2017-09-10schickel
1000126 188 3335 2^9 * 3 * 11 * 31 2^9 * 3 * 11 * 17 * 31 * 1871 * 281069 * 565985201 * C164 164 02017-10-31 14:31:36 3336
1000516 188 3350 2^9 * 3 * 11 * 31 2^9 * 3 * 11 * 17 * 31 * 1871 * 281069 * 565985201 * C164 164 02017-10-31 15:23:57 3351
1001560 188 3357 2^9 * 3 * 11 * 31 2^9 * 3 * 11 * 17 * 31 * 1871 * 281069 * 565985201 * C164 164 02017-10-31 19:12:30 3358
1001394 188 3359 2^9 * 3 * 11 * 31 2^9 * 3 * 11 * 17 * 31 * 1871 * 281069 * 565985201 * C164 164 02017-10-31 19:23:53 3360
1001638 188 3363 2^9 * 3 * 11 * 31 2^9 * 3 * 11 * 17 * 31 * 1871 * 281069 * 565985201 * C164 164 02017-10-31 19:27:24 3364
[/CODE]"That's a bingo! Is that how you say it?"

There are other similar cases there.
Surprisingly all "downdrivers" > 10[SUP]6[/SUP] were quickly reserved by the yoyo server. That's a waste 'cause they will have duplicate calculations performed. For no reason whatsoever.

Someone increased the search interval to 10[SUP]6[/SUP]+2000. Big mistake. (c)
:derailed:

[QUOTE=Batalov;470692]Surprisingly all "downdrivers" > 10[SUP]6[/SUP] were quickly reserved by the yoyo server. That's a waste 'cause they will have duplicate calculations performed. For no reason whatsoever.

Someone increased the search interval to 10[SUP]6[/SUP]+2000. Big mistake. (c)
:derailed:[/QUOTE]

It was me :) I need more sequences with composites < C130.
The yoyo server doesn't duplicate calculations. It has a mechanism to detect that a composite is already in progress and doesn't sent it again.

yoyo

BTW: We should lead this discussion in a separate thread.

[QUOTE=yoyo;470709]It was me :) I need more sequences with composites < C130.
The yoyo server doesn't duplicate calculations. It has a mechanism to detect that a composite is already in progress and doesn't sent it again.

yoyo

BTW: We should lead this discussion in a separate thread.[/QUOTE]

If you want smaller composites, then we would have to extend the range of sequences. Extending it only to 1 002 000 seems quite silly to me, especially in such an ad hoc manner which introduces much unnecessary noise.

If you want to extend it to, say, 2 000 000 or maybe even 10 000 000, we can discuss that in another thread, which would also include much smarter ways to do said extension without introducing needless noise on the main webpage.

[QUOTE=yoyo;470709]It was me :) I need more sequences with composites < C130.
[/QUOTE]
It is elementary, Watson!

Take all dangling C13X and C14Xs - there are absolutely tons of them.
ecm them very lightly - and almost [B]half of them[/B] will have p1X factors (this is checked on a few dozen unreserved sequences) - and Bob's your uncle! You will have hundreds if not thousands of C12Xs and C11Xs.

[QUOTE=Dubslow;470712]If you want smaller composites, then we would have to extend the range of sequences. Extending it only to 1 002 000 seems quite silly to me, especially in such an ad hoc manner which introduces much unnecessary noise.

If you want to extend it to, say, 2 000 000 or maybe even 10 000 000, we can discuss that in another thread, which would also include much smarter ways to do said extension without introducing needless noise on the main webpage.[/QUOTE]

Let's discuss about enlarging the reservation page in this thread: [url]http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=22680[/url]

Reserving 1000566

Reserving 1005150, 1005312, 1007850, 1011990, 1013400, 1013550, 1016190, 1017888, 1019190, 1019430, 1021650, 1021824, 1021980, 1024488, 1024938, 1026030, 1026592, 1026840, 1028064, 1028100, 1028160, 1041318, 1041582, 1041852

[SPOILER]what the heck[/SPOILER]