![]() |
Reserving R3 from n=225-300k (1-2.147G) for BOINC
|
[QUOTE=rogue;418272]I didn't check the reservation page and I did not look back far enough on this thread. I'll do from 60G to 63G then. I'll assume that your results for > 63G are good.[/QUOTE]
I am almost done to n=15000 for the range. It is taking much longer than expected. |
[QUOTE=VBCurtis;411792]All 3 sieves that I'm running at present (1G-2^31, 4-5G, 5-6G) are sieving to 500k. Reb is testing chunks of these sieves as sieve depth reaches the correct level for those chunks.
This winter, I'll fill the gap from 2^31 = 2.147G to 4G via srsieve. In the long run, I'd like to sieve 100k-500k for any 1G range that individuals get to 100k, but that depends to some extent on how popular this base gets. I do plan to use sr2sieve for 0-2^31 from 500k up to get some top-5000 work available for this drive by Spring. -Curtis[/QUOTE] Quarterly update: 4-6G are now sieving together 250-500k. 250-300 will be sent to Reb in a few weeks, then 300-500 at once some time later. 1G-2^31 is testing 225-300, with 300-500 left in the sieve. sr2 allows up to 8 threads, so the time delay from Reb sending me primes to a new chunk being ready for BOINC is shorter. 2^31-4G has commenced sieving. Once 1G-2^31 completes to 500k, I will sieve 0-2^31 together from 500k to 3M. Unless someone figures out which k's from 2^31 to 2^32 work with sr2, this is the largest k-range that will be done with sr2, so this block will sieve together forever. This will be a substantial undertaking, but I just acquired a 32-core Xeon server, so I'll feed 16 cores with sr2 and get a block ready for BOINC within a month. |
The main priority would be sieving k=2^31-4G for n=100K-500K to get it "caught up" with the other ranges. :smile:
|
Range 33G-43G is close to completion. Everything will be handed over in one mail with various drive links.
Reserving for R3 as new, the range 43G-49G to n=25K using srbsieve. |
R3 tested to n=300k (225-300k) (1-2.147G)
191 primes found, 760 remain in this range Results emailed, Base released |
I'm reserving for sieving for R3, k=13G to k=21G from n=25001 to n=100000 for my Sandy Bridge.
|
[QUOTE=KEP;424324]I'm reserving for sieving for R3, k=13G to k=21G from n=25001 to n=100000 for my Sandy Bridge.[/QUOTE]
You should consider doing these in 1G increments, or even smaller. After 1000 or so k values, srsieve isn't more efficient doing them all at once versus in separate sieves. Also, since srsieve isn't multi-threaded, you can do 8 different sieves on 8 hyperthreads and acheive happiness with less fiddling-with-factor-files. Rebirther- If KEP tests 25-50k on his own, will you take 50-100k on boinc? Tons of tiny tests, might not be worth the admin time... |
[QUOTE=VBCurtis;424327]
Rebirther- If KEP tests 25-50k on his own, will you take 50-100k on boinc? Tons of tiny tests, might not be worth the admin time...[/QUOTE] Yes, no problem. |
[QUOTE=VBCurtis;424327]You should consider doing these in 1G increments, or even smaller. After 1000 or so k values, srsieve isn't more efficient doing them all at once versus in separate sieves. Also, since srsieve isn't multi-threaded, you can do 8 different sieves on 8 hyperthreads and acheive happiness with less fiddling-with-factor-files.
Rebirther- If KEP tests 25-50k on his own, will you take 50-100k on boinc? Tons of tiny tests, might not be worth the admin time...[/QUOTE] Well, I'm running this way: 13G-15G 1 core 15G-17G 1 core 17G-19G 1 core 19G-21G 1 core I'm going to sieve this range on my Sandy Bridge, untill R3 gets completely tested to n=25K and after that I plan on testing with my i5-4670 the range of 13G-21G to n=100K. Personally even if Reb wouldn't mind, I do not recommend due to the short testing time to use BOINC. An n=100K test will take on the previously mentioned i5 about 9 sec per test, so a lot of time will be wasted on compressing and uploading results. Just my thoughts. If Reb still likes to use BOINC, I may as well stop at n=50K and hand Reb the rest :smile: |
[QUOTE=KEP;424417]
I'm going to sieve this range on my Sandy Bridge, untill R3 gets completely tested to n=25K and after that I plan on testing with my i5-4670 the range of 13G-21G to n=100K. Personally even if Reb wouldn't mind, I do not recommend due to the short testing time to use BOINC. An n=100K test will take on the previously mentioned i5 about 9 sec per test, so a lot of time will be wasted on compressing and uploading results. Just my thoughts. If Reb still likes to use BOINC, I may as well stop at n=50K and hand Reb the rest :smile:[/QUOTE] Let me know how many tests are total for this range (9s are ok but not less). Iam still waiting to rebuilt my VM on Saturday for more RAM, I have hit the limit of 32GB at the moment. |
| All times are UTC. The time now is 22:55. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.