[QUOTE=gd_barnes;232190]The k remaining should be 800983478 not 800984378..
This has now been corrected on the pages.

An interesting side note of this: I have even double-checked all k=500M-820M to n=25K
..
Thanks for effectively triple checking k=500M-820M Willem! :-)

Gary[/QUOTE]

Excellent.
Did you do the doublecheck with 335 or with 3.3.6? I was playing with 335 vs 336 when I found this. If you've done the range with 336 I'll leave it alone and do the lower half.

Thanks, Willem.

No. I doublechecked it long ago; sometime in late 2009; likely with PFGW version 3.2.7, 3.3.0, or thereabouts.

Fortunately Mark has indicated that smaller bases have little chance of the problem with fftlen's but you are certainly welcome to double/triplecheck some or all k's for n>100 with PFGW 3.4.0 or 3.4.1.

[QUOTE=gd_barnes;232404]No. I doublechecked it long ago; sometime in late 2009; likely with PFGW version 3.2.7, 3.3.0, or thereabouts.

Fortunately Mark has indicated that smaller bases have little chance of the problem with fftlen's but you are certainly welcome to double/triplecheck some or all k's for n>100 with PFGW 3.4.0 or 3.4.1.[/QUOTE]

Note that PFGW 3.4.0/3.4.1 using gwnum v26.2, which has new FFT lengths. If you want to compare FFT lengths then you need to compare 3.3.5 to 3.3.6.

[QUOTE=rogue;232416]Note that PFGW 3.4.0/3.4.1 using gwnum v26.2, which has new FFT lengths. If you want to compare FFT lengths then you need to compare 3.3.5 to 3.3.6.[/QUOTE]

I was indeed double checking the FFt lengths between 335 and 336. And the ones that turn out different can be rerun by 341 the quickest.
Were there zeropadded FFTs in 335? I may have gotten confused on versions, despite finding differences between (what I thought) was 335 and 336 runs with -F

Willem.

[QUOTE=Siemelink;232431]Were there zeropadded FFTs in 335?[/QUOTE]

Yes.

reserving 820-830M to 25k

What files is it that are being collected for base 3? Is it primes and remaining? I am afraid I don't have results as I forgot the -l.
Would [url]https://www.wetransfer.com/[/url] be good way of transferring large files? I couldn't see any ads when testing it although I do have pretty good ads protection.

[QUOTE=henryzz;239246]What files is it that are being collected for base 3? Is it primes and remaining? I am afraid I don't have results as I forgot the -l.
Would [url]https://www.wetransfer.com/[/url] be good way of transferring large files? I couldn't see any ads when testing it although I do have pretty good ads protection.[/QUOTE]
Primes, remaining k's, and algebraic factor eliminations need to be sent in after "from scratch" work like this; it's mainly for continuations of previous work (usually from n>=25K) that the full residuals are needed.

As far as the [URL]http://www.wetransfer.com/[/URL] web site: interesting. [URL]http://www.sendspace.com/[/URL] is one of the more popular ones on this forum due to its having 300 MB of space, month-long storage times (renewed with each download), and ads that are oh-so-slightly less obnoxious than other such services. :rolleyes: WeTransfer appears to allow transfers up to 2 GB (albeit only for two weeks, though often that's enough), and uses a nontraditional ad system (instead of banners or popups, a kind of "impression advertising" via the website's background image)--though it requires Flash (an issue for some). Pick your poison... :smile:

[QUOTE=henryzz;239246]What files is it that are being collected for base 3? Is it primes and remaining? I am afraid I don't have results as I forgot the -l.
[/QUOTE]

All we need for n<=25 on base 3 is all of the primes and k's remaining. No residuals are needed. There are no algebraic factor eliminations.

[QUOTE=mdettweiler;239248]As far as the [URL]http://www.wetransfer.com/[/URL] web site: interesting. [URL]http://www.sendspace.com/[/URL] is one of the more popular ones on this forum due to its having 300 MB of space, month-long storage times (renewed with each download), and ads that are oh-so-slightly less obnoxious than other such services. :rolleyes: WeTransfer appears to allow transfers up to 2 GB (albeit only for two weeks, though often that's enough), and uses a nontraditional ad system (instead of banners or popups, a kind of "impression advertising" via the website's background image)--though it requires Flash (an issue for some). Pick your poison... :smile:[/QUOTE]
I hadn't notice that they were ads on wetransfer. I just thought it a picture. Gary complained of popups and many ads when I used sendspace last time. Two weeks is plenty enough for sending results although quite possibly not enough for nfs.
Primes and remaining for 820-830M sent to Gary by WeTransfer email.

It ammuses me how much we dislike the ads considering we are using a free and very useful service.:smile:

[QUOTE=henryzz;239360]I hadn't notice that they were ads on wetransfer. I just thought it a picture. Gary complained of popups and many ads when I used sendspace last time. Two weeks is plenty enough for sending results although quite possibly not enough for nfs.
Primes and remaining for 820-830M sent to Gary by WeTransfer email.

It ammuses me how much we dislike the ads considering we are using a free and very useful service.:smile:[/QUOTE]
Yeah, I didn't notice it being an ad at first either but when I was checking it out I read the info page and they explained it. :smile:

I guess the dislike for the ads comes not so much from their being there when one [I]must[/I] use a service like Sendspace (in which case they're an inevitable consequent of sending a file that size for free); what Gary mentioned to me before as the main annoying thing is when people use Sendspace for files that are well below 10 MB (i.e., can be emailed pretty much regardless of your email provider).