[quote=axn;173767]I seriously doubt if it is some "one". Looks like Syd is running a batch job.[/quote]

Interesting, because all those aliquot sequences at such a low starting number either already have their termination already recorded on the database, or they are open-ends with their current status already there.

[quote=10metreh;173768]Interesting, because all those aliquot sequences at such a low starting number either already have their termination already recorded on the database, or they are open-ends with their current status already there.[/quote]
not all the low numbers have their current status
there are many numbers that have been terminated remaining below 1000

[quote=henryzz;173770]not all the low numbers have their current status
there are many numbers that have been terminated remaining below 1000[/quote]

:question: They're side-sequences!

[quote=10metreh;173771]:question: They're side-sequences![/quote]
whoops!!!

the Lehmer-5 are in the database but on P.Zimmermann's page 4 are given with higher indices than available! (inserted them on 'my' Summary-page)

i've created a torrent from Syd's SQL-database, don't know if it works (my first) (link on request).

[QUOTE=10metreh;173768]Interesting, because all those aliquot sequences at such a low starting number either already have their termination already recorded on the database, or they are open-ends with their current status already there.[/QUOTE]

Just being thorough, I guess?

I've just added ~1000 new lines of aliquot sequence 130396, and they don't seem to be showing up even though the primality tests have finished.

Edit: Ah, just noticed I missed out lines 2563-2599. :blush:

i think my sequence [URL="http://factorization.ath.cx/search.php?query=&se=1&aq=127308&action=last&fr=&to="]127308[/URL] might have merged with another which someone is currently working on using the workers
either that or someone is doing work for me via the workers
or have the workers decided to start themselves?

[quote=henryzz;173921]i think my sequence [URL="http://factorization.ath.cx/search.php?query=&se=1&aq=127308&action=last&fr=&to="]127308[/URL] might have merged with another which someone is currently working on using the workers
either that or someone is doing work for me via the workers
or have the workers decided to start themselves?[/quote]

I wouldn't expect a side-sequence when it didn't go down to something like 15 digits. But there was a batch job where each aliquot sequence was run in turn. Possibly it decided to run 127308 for some reason. When sequences are small, there is an "Add sequence to workers" option, too. I deliberately avoided submitting loads of lines of 130396 to the database when it was still low down, because I didn't want to get into a mess with the workers. I only submitted it when it reached about 75 digits - and it soon went off on another downdriver run.

Is it intended that workers #1 through #12 are no longer saying on which box they are running on?