[QUOTE=petrw1;270123]
168 P-1 completions (10 factors) in 14 days on 24 cores: 12 per day.

[/QUOTE]

I'm not quite there yet either ... but

57303131 2011-08-26 12:06 B1=685000, B2=20378750 5.4026
57268621 2011-08-26 10:24 B1=685000, B2=20378750 5.4026
52411783 2011-08-25 18:14 B1=615000, B2=16605000 4.1285
55760819 2011-08-25 17:35 B1=665000, B2=19617500 5.2170
57322553 2011-08-25 12:58 B1=685000, B2=20378750 5.4026
55620469 2011-08-24 20:28 B1=665000, B2=19617500 5.2170
57302939 2011-08-24 13:47 B1=685000, B2=20378750 5.4026
57231001 2011-08-24 00:37 B1=685000, B2=20378750 5.4026
55356113 2011-08-23 22:04 B1=655000, B2=17357500 4.8095
56552473 2011-08-23 20:32 B1=675000, B2=19406250 5.2107
56816653 2011-08-23 20:06 B1=680000, B2=20060000 5.3347
56244593 2011-08-23 14:39 B1=665000, B2=18287500 4.9943
54410173 2011-08-23 08:37 B1=640000, B2=17440000 4.4556
56838739 2011-08-22 17:05 B1=670000, B2=18592500 5.0599
50684063 2011-08-22 10:12 B1=590000, B2=15340000 3.7019
55447831 2011-08-21 19:03 B1=655000, B2=17848750 4.8918
56355113 2011-08-21 15:04 B1=670000, B2=18257500 5.0038
50132491 2011-08-21 07:18 B1=585000, B2=15063750 3.6494
50619223 2011-08-21 06:32 B1=590000, B2=15340000 3.7019
56794643 2011-08-20 21:53 B1=670000, B2=18592500 5.0599
52341683 2011-08-20 17:52 B1=615000, B2=16451250 4.1052
56226553 2011-08-20 14:51 134624114590567994209661373751147664039 4.8830
50447123 2011-08-20 07:05 B1=585000, B2=14917500 3.6282
54571843 2011-08-20 00:05 B1=655000, B2=19158750 4.7645
55708327 2011-08-19 14:29 B1=660000, B2=17820000 4.9015
55391317 2011-08-19 12:23 B1=660000, B2=19470000 5.1778
55748309 2011-08-19 08:42 B1=660000, B2=17985000 4.9291
51873079 2011-08-19 02:14 B1=610000, B2=16470000 4.0949
50051549 2011-08-18 18:43 B1=580000, B2=15080000 3.6392
52892963 2011-08-18 06:23 B1=620000, B2=16740000 4.1620
50260013 2011-08-17 20:21 B1=585000, B2=14917500 3.6282
55826467 2011-08-17 10:28 B1=665000, B2=18121250 4.9665
56658809 2011-08-17 08:12 B1=675000, B2=19912500 5.2955
50262343 2011-08-17 07:29 B1=585000, B2=14917500 3.6282
56410129 2011-08-17 03:10 B1=675000, B2=19912500 5.2955
56368709 2011-08-17 02:09 B1=670000, B2=19765000 5.2562
56902543 2011-08-17 00:43 B1=680000, B2=20060000 5.3347
50506613 2011-08-16 13:04 B1=590000, B2=15340000 3.7019
50330909 2011-08-15 19:49 B1=585000, B2=15210000 3.6705
50557181 2011-08-15 11:28 B1=585000, B2=15063750 3.6494
56764087 2011-08-15 02:41 B1=675000, B2=19912500 5.2955
50402239 2011-08-14 23:13 B1=585000, B2=14917500 3.6282
50447263 2011-08-14 21:41 B1=590000, B2=15340000 3.7019
51070507 2011-08-14 17:54 B1=595000, B2=15618750 3.7548
52055723 2011-08-14 13:50 B1=610000, B2=16470000 4.0949
56179787 2011-08-14 11:51 191038474920409465670953 4.9943
56325989 2011-08-14 03:54 B1=670000, B2=19765000 5.2562
54174737 2011-08-13 22:33 B1=575000, B2=13081250 3.5992
55724819 2011-08-13 04:37 B1=660000, B2=17985000 4.9291
55086649 2011-08-13 04:24 B1=655000, B2=17685000 4.8644
55103911 2011-08-13 02:22 B1=660000, B2=18810000 5.0673
52895473 2011-08-13 00:37 B1=300000, B2=6450000 1.7642
52006937 2011-08-12 14:50 B1=605000, B2=15578750 3.9469
55979857 2011-08-12 14:50 B1=670000, B2=19765000 5.2562
60098641 2011-08-12 07:19 B1=710000, B2=20057500 5.6826
56111983 2011-08-12 04:10 392841669521534965682663 2.0590
54673789 2011-08-12 03:42 B1=645000, B2=17576250 4.4904
55761931 2011-08-11 07:48 B1=660000, B2=17985000 4.9291
55129429 2011-08-11 06:20 B1=655000, B2=17685000 4.8644
50497289 2011-08-10 16:47 B1=590000, B2=15340000 3.7019
54675199 2011-08-10 09:09 B1=645000, B2=17576250 4.4904
50489339 2011-08-10 03:40 B1=590000, B2=15340000 3.7019
52804519 2011-08-10 02:37 B1=620000, B2=16740000 4.1620
52129423 2011-08-09 21:45 B1=610000, B2=15707500 3.9795
57813799 2011-08-09 15:33 B1=690000, B2=20010000 5.3554
50488883 2011-08-09 11:38 B1=590000, B2=15340000 3.7019
52009549 2011-08-08 23:09 B1=610000, B2=16470000 4.0949
51796301 2011-08-08 21:01 B1=610000, B2=16470000 4.0949
52038449 2011-08-08 18:16 78858056319245685398671 1.6945
55804477 2011-08-08 10:45 B1=660000, B2=17985000 4.9291
55583029 2011-08-08 09:42 B1=660000, B2=17820000 4.9015
56827163 2011-08-08 04:55 B1=680000, B2=20060000 5.3347
54194053 2011-08-07 12:13 B1=635000, B2=17303750 4.4208
54970687 2011-08-07 04:43 B1=650000, B2=17225000 4.4491
56577097 2011-08-07 00:49 B1=675000, B2=19912500 5.2955
52761883 2011-08-06 22:52 B1=620000, B2=16740000 4.1620
55331167 2011-08-06 15:40 2925486621346516540119237367 4.8918
51991897 2011-08-06 03:21 B1=605000, B2=15578750 3.9469
57231227 2011-08-06 01:43 B1=685000, B2=20378750 5.4026
55029347 2011-08-05 19:42 B1=655000, B2=17685000 4.5345
55832807 2011-08-05 18:13 B1=665000, B2=18121250 4.9665
51876499 2011-08-05 00:42 B1=610000, B2=16470000 4.0949
56853421 2011-08-04 20:28 B1=670000, B2=18592500 5.0599
50289137 2011-08-04 13:02 B1=585000, B2=15210000 3.6705
53438657 2011-08-04 05:35 B1=635000, B2=18097500 4.4069
55029157 2011-08-03 22:21 B1=655000, B2=17685000 4.5345
50387027 2011-08-03 14:46 B1=595000, B2=15321250 3.7117
52778303 2011-08-03 13:25 B1=620000, B2=16740000 4.1620
54497011 2011-08-03 12:49 B1=655000, B2=19158750 4.7645
56756803 2011-08-03 10:08 B1=675000, B2=19575000 5.2389
54499339 2011-08-03 02:43 B1=655000, B2=19158750 4.7645
50070653 2011-08-03 00:39 B1=580000, B2=15080000 3.6392
53387443 2011-08-02 19:15 B1=635000, B2=18573750 4.4790
51828901 2011-08-02 07:30 B1=610000, B2=16470000 4.0949
54496969 2011-08-01 21:48 B1=655000, B2=19158750 4.7645
54499759 2011-08-01 11:34 B1=655000, B2=19158750 4.7645
52056857 2011-08-01 07:07 1606218329759823059143 1.6944
52048327 2011-08-01 02:42 B1=610000, B2=16470000 4.0949
52018843 2011-07-31 21:35 B1=610000, B2=16470000 4.0949
54494591 2011-07-31 13:27 B1=655000, B2=19158750 4.7645
50023543 2011-07-31 13:18 B1=580000, B2=15080000 3.6392
50205007 2011-07-31 04:01 B1=585000, B2=14917500 3.6282
50204851 2011-07-30 23:00 B1=585000, B2=14917500 3.6282
52061381 2011-07-30 16:55 B1=610000, B2=16470000 4.0949
53900617 2011-07-30 15:31 B1=630000, B2=17167500 4.3860
52719371 2011-07-30 06:39 B1=620000, B2=16430000 4.1151
56289403 2011-07-30 04:31 B1=670000, B2=19765000 5.2562
56730197 2011-07-30 00:28 B1=675000, B2=19912500 5.2955
55075387 2011-07-29 19:39 B1=655000, B2=17685000 4.8644
55011421 2011-07-29 18:46 11464331472925546285409 4.5345
52019819 2011-07-28 19:30 B1=610000, B2=16470000 4.0949
54688199 2011-07-28 19:27 B1=645000, B2=17576250 4.4904
54372293 2011-07-28 16:25 B1=640000, B2=17120000 4.4056
60100717 2011-07-28 12:19 B1=710000, B2=19347500 5.5580
52014709 2011-07-27 22:28 B1=610000, B2=16470000 4.0949
52126493 2011-07-27 15:44 B1=610000, B2=16470000 4.0949
52727921 2011-07-27 12:03 B1=620000, B2=16740000 4.1620
54203507 2011-07-27 11:39 B1=635000, B2=17303750 4.4208

7 Cores, 118 Tests, 31 Days, 7 Factors ... 3.8/Day

Doug

[QUOTE=petrw1;270123]Two week update:

168 P-1 completions (10 factors) in 14 days on 24 cores: 12 per day.

With a max of 17 on August 19th[/QUOTE]

322 P-1 completions in August ... 19 factors

1055 completions. 93 factors. 8.8152% success rate, roughly.

1396 completions, 54 factors (3.87%), about 458GHz-days of work.
The quantity is so high and the success rate is so low because I'm mostly cleaning up the ranges that have little-to-no P-1 (current around 10M and 45M).

Broken down a little further:
9.7M-10.4M = 1324 completions, 51 factors (3.85%) // really-old
44.6M-52.6M = 59 completions, 2 factors (3.39%) // between LL and DC
54.3M-71.7M = 13 completions, 1 factor (7.69%) // "normal" pre-LL P-1

Last 60 days
 

630 P-1 completions in the current LL range. (10.5 per day).

39 Factors found = 6.2%

As a side bar it appears that (at least for now) P-1 is keeping up with LL.
I have been watching the Primenet Summary for a few weeks now and there are consistently more than 3,000 LL tests available in the 5xM range.

[QUOTE=petrw1;274130]630 P-1 completions in the current LL range. (10.5 per day).

39 Factors found = 6.2%

As a side bar it appears that (at least for now) P-1 is keeping up with LL.
I have been watching the Primenet Summary for a few weeks now and there are consistently more than 3,000 LL tests available in the 5xM range.[/QUOTE]

Good.
But a CPU willing (20% likely) to go through a LL to completion
can probably do the P-1 if necessary.
What it shouldn't get out of bed for is TFing when a GPU does
it 100x faster than it could.

V4 used to proudly proclaim: "TF is comfortably (understatement)
in front of the LL wavefront".

[B]MY ARSE[/B]

[QUOTE=davieddy;274160]Good.
But a CPU willing (20% likely) to go through a LL to completion
can probably do the P-1 if necessary.
What it shouldn't get out of bed for is TFing when a GPU does
it 100x faster than it could.

V4 used to proudly proclaim: "TF is comfortably (understatement)
in front of the LL wavefront".

[B]MY ARSE[/B][/QUOTE]

Good lord, calm down! Peterw can probably tell you that 20% or so of that P-1 he is reporting in the last 60 days is from me.....all of 8 computers, one just recently on-line, a GT440 GPU and a GT480 GPU....

GIMPS received this great gift of GPUs, which nicely speed up TF and make CPUs obsolete at it, and you complain because, a year or two later, the full optimum (which has us doing only 10-20% less LL tests anyway) hasn't *quite* been reached, and the programming is still not really complete?

I'd better crack my number theory books, so as to find a new, faster, and more reliable method of finding factors....back in a year or three..... :smile:

[QUOTE=davieddy;274160]Good.

V4 used to proudly proclaim: "TF is comfortably (understatement)
in front of the LL wavefront".

[B]MY ARSE[/B][/QUOTE]

Isn't that what George is suggesting again here?
[url]http://www.mersenneforum.org/showpost.php?p=267323&postcount=83[/url]

A few months ago the TF wavefront was in the 80M range; YEARS ahead of LL so he opened 1 and then another and then another bit level just ahead of the current LL wavefront (5xMillions)

Or am I missing the sarcasm? Or you agreeding with George and suggesting TF is TOO far ahead?

[QUOTE=Christenson;274190]Peterw can probably tell you that 20% or so of that P-1 he is reporting in the last 60 days is from me[/QUOTE]

Just a minor point of clarification. I was only reporting that I had 630 P-1 completions in 60 days. The project as a whole has done significantly more than that.

@Eric and Petrw1
 

I think George knows what I'm trying to say.
Dubslow just wondered why he was being asked to TF
a 57 M exponent to 71 bits when it wasn't close to getting an LL test,
while currently LL tests are being dished out routinely under TFed.
I blame ckdo and such for hoarding TF assignments and not doing the
f*ckers.
[url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nlk9Sj4Ns2k][B]Stir it up[/B][/url]

David

[QUOTE=davieddy;274204]I blame ckdo and such for hoarding TF assignments and not doing the f*ckers.[/QUOTE]

Just to get this straight: The highest exponent I have assigned is 47,447,837. It's been LL tested before, but not P-1 tested (surprise, an on topic post).

So, if you're looking for someone who's holding up progress at whatever wavefront, look elsewhere.

If you're looking for someone to throw some smokin' silicon "at the coalface", also look elsewhere. I ain't interested.

And, lest we forget, you should consider the option of shelling out a few bucks and getting some work done yourself, rather than trying to evangelize those pursuing different goals.