[QUOTE=lycorn;204505]Will this one do? :whistle:[/QUOTE]Do you have copyright clearance for that? :wink:

Paul

Well ... P-1 factoring [I]someone[/I] evidently:

[code]
James 49733791 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 10:02AM 1.4 2.3971 1873455465277893886657
James 49718873 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 10:02AM 1.4 2.3971 B1=780000
James 49760719 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 10:01AM 1.3 2.2127 B1=720000
James 49736749 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 10:01AM 1.4 2.3971 B1=780000
James 49731637 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 10:01AM 1.4 2.3971 B1=780000
James 49728817 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 10:00AM 1.4 2.3971 B1=780000
James 49745867 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:59AM 1.3 2.3971 B1=780000
James 49745783 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:59AM 1.3 2.3971 B1=780000
James 49762367 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:59AM 1.3 2.3971 B1=780000
James 49750123 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:58AM 1.3 2.3971 B1=780000
James 49737487 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:57AM 1.3 2.3971 B1=780000
James 49744759 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:57AM 1.3 2.3971 B1=780000
James 49737341 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:56AM 1.3 2.3971 B1=780000
James 49728431 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:55AM 1.3 2.3971 B1=780000
James 49695941 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:55AM 1.4 2.3971 B1=780000
James 49745767 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:55AM 1.3 2.3971 B1=780000
James 49694527 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:55AM 1.4 2.3971 B1=780000
James 49735243 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:55AM 1.3 2.3971 2320090676794788214983031
James 49755631 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:54AM 1.3 2.3971 B1=780000
James 49746061 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:53AM 1.3 2.3971 B1=780000
James 49721137 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:53AM 1.3 2.3971 B1=780000
James 49709059 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:53AM 1.3 2.3971 B1=780000
James 49719533 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:53AM 1.3 2.3971 B1=780000
James 49717991 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:53AM 1.3 2.3971 B1=780000
James 49720609 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:52AM 1.3 2.3971 B1=780000
James 49755301 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:52AM 1.3 2.3971 B1=780000
James 49738253 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:52AM 1.3 2.3971 B1=780000
James 49724491 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:52AM 1.3 2.3971 B1=780000
James 49755001 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:52AM 1.3 2.3971 B1=780000
James 49726351 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:51AM 1.3 2.3971 B1=780000
James 49734731 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:51AM 1.3 2.3971 B1=780000
James 49697591 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:50AM 1.4 2.3971 B1=780000
James 49736213 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:50AM 1.3 2.3971 B1=780000
James 49714741 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:50AM 1.3 2.3971 B1=780000

...

James 49733791 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 10:02AM 1.4 2.3971 1873455465277893886657
James 49735243 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:55AM 1.3 2.3971 2320090676794788214983031
James 49694221 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:47AM 1.4 2.3971 19897296723709230312073
James 49735159 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:15AM 1.3 2.3971 130270369806066541807579529
James 49731991 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:15AM 1.3 2.2127 606817814279085330295297951
James 49712599 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:08AM 1.3 2.3971 665269573812930208559
James 49753673 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:01AM 1.3 2.3971 1830345955745895021825961
James 49734983 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 8:59AM 1.3 2.3971 2254226350401960940822777
James 49746911 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 8:53AM 1.3 2.3971 6225812995736920681297
James 49735601 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 8:47AM 1.3 2.3971 192228443391170402259583
James 49751551 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 8:45AM 1.3 2.3971 1531872169111388854591
James 49711799 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 8:42AM 1.3 2.3971 1595041353334303484017
James 49693729 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 8:37AM 1.4 2.3971 13763588060427270801487
James 49711357 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 8:05AM 1.3 2.3971 5478842329678065907384351
James 49733491 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 7:57AM 1.3 2.3971 1761687596162411475572071
James 49699061 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 7:54AM 1.3 2.3971 440390638088971166607359
James 49703873 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 7:48AM 1.3 2.3971 675367201520896543229140177
James 49698029 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 7:48AM 1.3 2.3971 5695221164268402380212483903
James 49751543 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 7:34AM 1.2 2.2127 362174978092767293949951199
James 49692551 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 7:11AM 1.3 2.3971 929292757341394592683969
James 49711069 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 7:04AM 1.3 2.3971 17433694601052115837177
James 49720571 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 6:09AM 1.2 2.3971 172777740921678338696039
James 49702699 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 6:05AM 1.2 2.3971 1991631071405905203961
James 49689193 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 5:49AM 1.3 2.3971 2600251274417877949049
James 49700501 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 5:29AM 1.2 2.3971 191157995127878667937921
James 49690057 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 3:51AM 1.2 2.3971 626003563005653533993
[/code]Damn impressive. :judge:

[QUOTE=ckdo;205457]Damn impressive.[/QUOTE]But no Stage 2 :-(

Jacob

But given that stage2 is lagging behind, something is probably better than nothing.

Top 100
 

I just broke into the top 100 for P-1! :party: Reminds me of the brief period in 1996 when I made the top 100 overall with only my P200 :smile:

Is 17% success rate TOO suspicious???
 

I have one PC that so far in 2010 has done 30 Large P-1 tests with 5 successes (almost 17%).
It has allocated about 800M of RAM and estimates success in the 6.6% range.

It has also crashed Prime95 twice while submitting a F-PM1 result.

[QUOTE][url]http://www.mersenneforum.org/showpost.php?p=201000&postcount=144[/url][/QUOTE]

Are F-PM1 factors verified before being accepted?
i.e. Do I simply have a statistical anomaly or might there be reason to believe this PC is unstable and has submitted incorrect factor-found results?

[QUOTE=petrw1;208170]Are F-PM1 factors verified before being accepted?[/quote]
yes

[QUOTE=petrw1;208170]Do I simply have a statistical anomaly[/QUOTE]

i wouldn't call it an anomaly. expected was 2, got 5. no biggie. you'll be balanced out by lot of people with fewer-than-expected results.

btw, you can check [url]http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/[/url] to see if the factors have made thru.

[QUOTE=axn;208172]btw, you can check [url]http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/[/url] to see if the factors have made thru.[/QUOTE]

Thanks....yup they are all registered.

In fact it went one step further and factored one of my factors found as it was not prime itself.

The only thing I might be a bit worried about is that it's not always submitting the no-factor-found results, but that seems unlikely considering the timing (a bit over 2 days per result to have 30 in 2010).
I'd call it an anomaly. (as long as no pedantic people want to consider the word as being overly-specific, but a quick dictionary check suggests it'd be good enough) An unlikely event, for sure, but not so impossibly unlikely as to be a sure indicator of a problem.

[QUOTE=Mini-Geek;208177]The only thing I might be a bit worried about is that it's not always submitting the no-factor-found results, but that seems unlikely considering the timing (a bit over 2 days per result to have 30 in 2010).[/QUOTE]

What about this should I be worried about? The fact that it only completed 30 results in 70 days?

I know I have had others suggesting P-1 completions in closer to 1 day but I have never been able to acheive that ... am I doing something wrong?

As long as there is adequate RAM (at least 2G) I allocate somewhere between 750M-1000M.
For exponents in the 50M range I always get an estimated success rate of 6-7%.
B1/B2 are typically about 600K / 16M
On my bigger dual/quad PCs with 1 core P-1 and the rest DC my P-1 run times are:
[CODE]Q9550 / E6550 about 50 hours
i7-860 about 36 hours
i5-750 (OC to 3.2) about 32 hours[/CODE]
I can get better timings if the other core(s) are doing TF or nothing but I'd prefer to contribute to P-1 / DC where a need was suggested.

P.S. I have noted that so far this year I have lost 5 P-1 results during Server Outages (4 on this PC). George knows and will check on his return.

[QUOTE=petrw1;208170]I have one PC that so far in 2010 has done 30 Large P-1 tests with 5 successes (almost 17%). It has allocated about 800M of RAM and estimates success in the 6.6% range.
[/QUOTE]

Almost exactly 5% probability of 5 or more successes in 30 trials. Lucky, but not incredible.

William