[quote=Flatlander;150299]Er, step 4.5) was implied.:smile:
When I downloaded WinPFGW there was a WinPFGW.exe file and a PFGW.exe file in the folder. (For Windows.)

I could take the first step higher than n=1000 but then I would need to dig out primes n>1000 from a huge prime file to give to you![/quote]


Hum. I'll have to download it again. I wonder what the difference is.

Is the only thing stopping you from going higher with it is the fact that you have to send me primes for n>1000?

If so, we need to work out something different. The fact that you have to send me primes should not greatly increase testing time or be very inconvienient for you. If you feel that testing to n=2500 or 5000 first using PFGW is more efficient, perhaps Kenneth's scripts can be tweaked to separate out primes for n>1000 from primes n<=1000.


Gary