[quote=Prime95;151936]Just for you --- Merge the two machines, you should get an error message. Then add [spoiler]"&date_override=99"[/spoiler] to the URL and try again. Let me know if that works.[/quote]

:tu: Works. :bow:

[QUOTE=petrw1;151949]It seems odd that the Core2 Processor while slower has a P4 equivalent 42% more than the Quad Processor.

Could it be that for the Core2 it is accounting for both cores and for the Quad it is only accounting for 1?

Or does Build 4 compute differently?[/QUOTE]

The P4 equivalent numbers are changing (slightly) so I incorrectly assumed it is some calculated measure of performance based solely on the hardware ... it must have something to do with results returned ... and if that is the case then my previous question MIGHT BE moot.

Never mind: (Now where is that icon that represents "research first; ask questions later"
[url]http://www.mersenneforum.org/showpost.php?p=148564&postcount=6[/url]

[QUOTE=cheesehead;151961]Details that may matter:

The first computer listed is "Manual testing".

The second one is "v4_computers". [/QUOTE]

First: Results you have manually submitted
Second: ALL pooled results prior to the v5 cutover (Oct 20-27) + any results since the cutover from machines you had/have NOT yet upgraded to Prime95 v25.7.

These two DO NOT have checkboxes for me either; probably because they do NOT represent actual specific CPUs so it does NOT make sense to try to merge them.

[quote=petrw1;151992]+ any results since the cutover from machines you had/have NOT yet upgraded to Prime95 v25.7.

These two DO NOT have checkboxes for me either; probably because they do NOT represent actual specific CPUs so it does NOT make sense to try to merge them.[/quote]Oh, I had failed to connect what I read here about v4_computers to what I see on my reports. Thanks.

Team links and questions.
 

Hi folks,

I'm fiddling with the team panels on Primenet 5.0

1 - I'm noticing that links related to team details do not work. Is it the same for you?

2 - Is it possible (George, Scott?) to change Team password? Older teams have their password spread out of the Internet due to installation purposes. That's not fine for security purposes...

3 - Once a user has joined a team, is it possible for the user to still see his personal stats ranking together with team stats ranking?

Thank you for the attention.

Luigi

[QUOTE=ET_;152059]
1 - I'm noticing that links related to team details do not work. Is it the same for you?

2 - Is it possible (George, Scott?) to change Team password? Older teams have their password spread out of the Internet due to installation purposes. That's not fine for security purposes...

3 - Once a user has joined a team, is it possible for the user to still see his personal stats ranking together with team stats ranking?[/QUOTE]

The team web pages need a lot of work - they will improve over time. There is no way to change the password.

Any idea on the TF Counts Summary vs Results?
 

Summary (Last 365 days):
[QUOTE]TF 105 1518 425.1299 10,408 [/QUOTE]
Results:
[QUOTE]petrw1 has 8,717 results in the last 365 days
(Of these, 8,700 are TF)[/QUOTE]

So I am overcounted by 1,708 TF

In case this helps:
Nov 9-17: 5,084 TF 2^58 - 2^61: Reports as one result each
Nov 17-: 924 TF 2^58 - 2^64: Reports as 3 results at 58-62, 63 and 64
In recent days the Summary count and Results count are going up the same so whatever caused the discrepancy was happening in the past and has been fixed now but the totals still mismatch.

Thanks

PIII TF Anomaly
 

I was reviewing TF performance for 3 of my PCs that were/are factoring.

I concentrated on the 58M-59M range as that is the one range all 3 have results in.

As expected each extra bit level about doubles the elapsed time ...

... with one exception:

From 64 to 65 bits my PIII time is almost quadruple 63 to 64 bits.
[CODE]
Bits P4 (Hrs) PIII (Hrs)
64 0.35 1.37
65 0.63 6.34[/CODE]

Is this simply a result of 32 vs 64 bit architecture?

[QUOTE=petrw1;152112]Summary (Last 365 days):

So I am overcounted by 1,708 TF[/QUOTE]

Individual TF-LMH result lines are deleted before 365 days pass. This explains the discrepancy. I've added a footnote to the results report.

[QUOTE=Prime95;152124]Individual TF-LMH result lines are deleted before 365 days pass. This explains the discrepancy. I've added a footnote to the results report.[/QUOTE]

This does NOT appear to be the case for my account.
My last TF completed Nov 9 10:13
My first TF-LMH completed Nov 9 10:15.

There is only a small (recent) gap in my Results between Nov 9 10:15 and Nov 10 00:23 accounting for about 400 results (I extract them regularly) .
The 1708 missing results would have taken my TF-LMH PIII-866 about 2.5 days.

Also, contrary to your new footnote the 400 or so missing results are still counted in the line: [U]petrw1 has 8,717 results in the last 365 days [/U]as that count matches the count in my extract file that includes the deleted lines.

[QUOTE=petrw1;152135]This does NOT appear to be the case for my account.[/QUOTE]

V4 credits? Those wouldn't be in the count either.