mersenneforum.org

mersenneforum.org (https://www.mersenneforum.org/index.php)
-   Five or Bust - The Dual Sierpinski Problem (https://www.mersenneforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=86)
-   -   The probable primes (https://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=10761)

Cybertronic 2009-06-24 07:34

Thank you, Gary ! This was very extensive.

:-)

kar_bon 2009-06-24 07:34

for a german like me, too, i use this link sometimes when my school-English isn't practicable:

[url]http://www.dict.cc/?s=whatcha+gonna+do[/url]

Cybertronic 2009-06-24 08:30

[quote=kar_bon;178664]for a german like me, too, i use this link sometimes when my school-English isn't practicable:

[URL]http://www.dict.cc/?s=whatcha+gonna+do[/URL][/quote]

Kar_bon, du wirst lachen, genau diese ist auch meine.

Svenie25 2009-06-24 08:46

Kein eigentlich nur besser sein als Babel Fish.^^

henryzz 2009-06-24 19:32

i never realized we had several Germans on the forum
i had better not say some of the jokes that spring to mind after they beat us at football

Cybertronic 2009-06-25 04:40

[quote=henryzz;178746]i never realized we had several Germans on the forum
i had better not say some of the jokes that spring to mind after they beat us at football[/quote]

Note, mathematics is for the elite. Football is for the infantry !
I hate football. You are right here .

philmoore 2009-06-30 03:45

I just verified the certificate for [TEX]2^{22464}+63691[/TEX] generated by engracio, so this is now a proven prime. The verification took 29 hours, 7 minutes, and 29 seconds on an Athlon XP 1400 MHz chip, fast considering how long it took him to generate it! Interestingly enough, the other verification of [TEX]2^{21954}+77899[/TEX] (see post #36) took 28 hours, 45 minutes, and 47 seconds on a faster 3000 MHz Pentium D processor. I've been aware that Primo seems to run particularly well on AMD chips, I wonder if this extends to 64-bit processors.

We now have 28 remaining probable primes, in addition to the 3 sequences for which we are still searching for a probable prime. Way to go, Engracio!
:bow wave::bow wave::bow wave:

Cybertronic 2009-07-08 08:50

Dear members, in 3-4 weeks ( so I hope ) the certificate is available.
Based on the actual stand.

Stand : Day 58 , Phase 1 TEST 281 21876/29728 : Phase 2 TEST 260

..

Normi

Cybertronic 2009-07-19 20:28

You don't believe it, in few days (10?) , the certificate of "2^29727+ 20273" is maybe available....time total: about 80 days

engracio 2009-07-19 20:56

[quote=Cybertronic;181767]You don't believe it, in few days (10?) , the certificate of "2^29727+ 20273" is maybe available....time total: about 80 days[/quote]

Normi,

When you get that certificate and Phil validates the certificate, you my friend will have to break down and try to make a SIMPLE howto on your system for people like me that has black string on my left hand and white string on my righ hand.:shock: What's my name again???

Maybe the next few prime will be done sooner.:smile:

Cybertronic 2009-07-20 06:01

[quote=engracio;181772]

When you get that certificate and Phil validates the certificate, [/quote]

The last step is the validation by me (takes about 24-30h) , because the *.out-file have for now a invalid signature.

Also it is possible to create a TEAM worldwide for one certification.

ET_ 2009-07-20 09:24

2^26795 + 57083
 
My certification is slowly pacing on.

I'm actually at Phase 1, test 217, run 1, bits 21058/26796

The good news: it seems that I'm going faster and faster through the test :smile:

Luigi

Cybertronic 2009-07-23 14:15

..more , when ready on Monday or Tuesday :smile:

gd_barnes 2009-07-23 18:57

My proof of 2^24910+62029 completed about 2 days ago. Phil, what file(s) do you need and where should I send it/them?

It took about 15-20 days longer than expected. I did have 2 power outages while running the proof but I kept it backed up once/day and reverted back to the prior day's backup each time.

I have to admit I have no desire to do such a long proof again but it was fun to prove a big one and I learned some things about the software and timings. :-) I will be curious to see how high people will continue reserving these here.


Gary

philmoore 2009-07-23 19:22

Thanks, Gary. Anyone can run a verification on the certificate, so it is fine if Norman wants to run his. However, I would enjoy verifying it as well, also to see how certification with Cert_Val compares with that of Primo. The file you need to send me is the .out file from your work folder. Norman, I would appreciate a copy of your .out file as well, before you run the verification. You can email me at moorep at lanecc period edu.

I am leaving on vacation on Saturday for a couple of weeks, so I will presume that Gary's verification will go smoothly and update this thread. Congratulations, Gary! Looking forward to hearing of Norman's results soon...

Cybertronic 2009-07-23 19:45

[quote=philmoore;182415] I would appreciate a copy of your .out file as well, before you run the verification. You can email me at moorep at lanecc period edu.[/quote]

Sorry, the verification is the LAST step of my methode. There are not exist an .out-file, just an .tmp-file.

I have to do rename the tmp-file to out and then I start the verification.

Now I'm on TEST 536 ( 14941/29792 ). The next 2 days is a full time job, by my hands.

But you get a copy from the valid ( so I hope ) certification.

Also I have a nice downrun-table :smile:

DOWNRUN-Table
Date......... Phase 1 Digits..Phase 2
................at Test .left ...Tests done
05/10/2009 001 ..... 8949
05/25/2009 050...... 8455. 037
06/05/2009 100...... 7988. 083
06/18/2009 150 ......7555. 129
06/25/2009 200 ......7166. 175
07/05/2009 250 ......6830. 239
....




Norman

philmoore 2009-07-23 20:06

Then the .temp is what I would need to test whether Cert_Val can also do the verification. If you can't send that (maybe you have a script that starts the verification automatically), I will see if Cert_Val can work from the completed verified certificate.

Phil

gd_barnes 2009-07-24 07:15

Phil, I have Emailed you the certification.

Cybertronic 2009-07-27 17:53

Good news , principled the certificate is done. ( at the moment with
an invalid signature )
The validation is running. I believe it takes 28h.

Number of tests : only 1127
Running time : 1880 h

I cross my fingers ! :smile:

Best

[URL="http://www.dict.cc/englisch-deutsch/principled.html"]
[/URL]

Cybertronic 2009-07-29 03:35

Yeah ! It's done. 2^29727+20273 is PRIME !!!

Running time <80 days.

ET_ 2009-07-29 09:37

Congratulations! :smile:

Now my effort to find the biggest prime with Primo has been blown out.

Unless your result is to be considered "distributed"... :devil:

Phil?

Luigi

Cybertronic 2009-07-29 10:07

[quote=ET_;183253]Congratulations! :smile:

Now my effort to find the biggest prime with Primo has been blown out.

Unless your result is to be considered "distributed"... :devil:

Phil?

Luigi[/quote]


Thank you !

"Now my effort to find the biggest prime with Primo has been blown out."

The old record was 8125 digit.

Certificate available at PRIMO homepage

Best

Norman

philmoore 2009-07-29 15:08

Congratulations, Norman! Marcel has noted the achievement here:
[url]http://www.ellipsa.eu/public/primo/top20.html[/url]

engracio 2009-07-29 17:56

[quote=Cybertronic;183256]Thank you !

"Now my effort to find the biggest prime with Primo has been blown out."

The old record was 8125 digit.

Certificate available at PRIMO homepage

Best

Norman[/quote]

Congrats Norman:smile: , now where is that howto??:wink: Maybe we can do more than just 10 primes???

Kosmaj 2009-07-30 01:31

Norman,

Congrats on a nice proof and the new ECPP record!

Cybertronic 2009-07-30 15:02

Thanks for your compliments !

I take "2^33548 +4471" , I will see , what PRIMO do.

Estimate time: 160 days.

It is a 10099 digit number , the first gigantic :smile:

---------

Lol, I'm on TEST 2

Here an exitation

[url]http://www.sendspace.com/file/j7y0dk[/url]

philmoore 2009-07-31 15:00

Norman, I have a suggestion:

Write up a detailed description of your method in German, and we will translate it so others may try it. I know enough German to do a rough translation, and we have several German users of this forum that I'm sure would be willing to help. You could post your description, or send it to me, and we will post the translation. It would be exciting to do several more of these numbers!

Phil

Cybertronic 2009-07-31 17:36

Okay Phil, I will write in an easy german, but is it a problem to mention me namently ... as second name ?

philmoore 2009-07-31 18:07

I will just paste the translation into one of your posts so everyone knows that you developed the method. If you wish, you could post in the thread [B]Primo 3.0.7[/B] as a sort of user's guide for advanced users.

Cybertronic 2009-07-31 18:27

Hier eine Anleitung in Deutsch, bei Fragen , fragen !

[B]Anleitung zur parallelen Nutzung von PRIMO auf einem[/B]

[B]Multicore-System[/B]


[B]Anmerkung:[/B]
[B]Die Spezialversion von PRIMO V 3.0.6 (special) ist zu Begin am besten geeignet, da diese für große Zahlen „tiefer“ arbeitet und die ersten [/B]
[B]TEST’s mit höherer Wahrscheinlichkeit beendet. Einen zeitlichen[/B]
[B]Verlust gegenüber V 3.0.7 gibt es nicht. Dennoch kann PRIMO schon ab 8000 Stellen überfordert sein. [/B]

[B]Verfahren:[/B]
[B]Es gibt 5 Tabellen RUN1,2,3,4,5 und ein RUN6.[/B]
[B]Öffnet man die tmp-Datei, gibt es 3 wichtige Parameter.[/B]
[B]1.[/B][B]pe=1,2,3 : 1 – Phase 1 , 2- Phase 2 , 3- tmp wird in out umgeschrieben[/B]
[B]2.[/B][B]ar=1,2,3,4,5,6 : hier wird RUN bei einem TEST festgelegt, welcher ausgeführt werden soll[/B]
[B]3.[/B][B]ap= ??? : hier wird der letzte Stand des Indexes des RUNs eingetragen[/B]
[B]Es ergeben sich Indexzahlen für RUN 1,2,3,4,5,6 wiefolgt:[/B]
[B]RUN 1: ap= 1..97500 etwa[/B]
[B]RUN 2: ap= 1..153000 etwa[/B]
[B]RUN 3: ap= 1..212000 etwa[/B]
[B]RUN 4: ap= 1..272000 etwa[/B]
[B]RUN 5: ap= 1..139500 etwa[/B]
[B]RUN 6: ap= 1..2^25-1 -> entspricht delta = - ******[/B]

[B]Je nach Coreanzahl kann man PRIMO mehrmals starten, ohne Zeitverlust.[/B]
[B]2 Möglichkeiten gibt es:[/B]
[B]Entweder man ändert ar bei einem weiteren Task oder [/B]
[B]ar bleibt gleich und man staffelt ap geeignet um schneller ein RUN zu beenden. [/B]

[B]Wie geht man vor ?[/B]
-[B]Erstelle je nach Coreanzahl gleichartige PRIMO Verzeichnisse Beispiel: C:\P1 , C:\P2, ...[/B]
-[B]kopiere alle Programmdateien in jedes Verzeichnis[/B]
-[B]Erstelle eine *.in Datei und initialisiere diese[/B]
-[B]Bei Phase 1 RUN 1 , abbrechen und die *.tmp in jedes Verzeichnis kopieren [/B]
-[B]jetzt kann schon editiert werden, ar=1 und ar=2 und ar=3,... und mehrere Aufgaben rechnen an verschiedenen Stellen[/B]
-[B]Jeder ! Schritt muss zu Begin dokumentiert werden, ich mache es mit „Excel“, damit im Falle eines erfolglosen TESTs ein manueller Backtrack leichter fällt.[/B]
-[B]ist ein TEST abgeschlossen , wird abgebrochen und alle ap’s werden für ein späteres (falls Fehlschlag) Zurücksetzen dokumentiert[/B]
-[B]die neue tmp-Datei wird geeignet gespeichert , in einem anderen Verzeichnis...Beispiel als *.Test2_32981 „(bits)“ und die anderen tmp’s in den übrigen Verzeichnissen mit der neuen überschrieben.[/B]
-[B]auch die .s?? Datei sollte bei jedem Verzeichnis, falls alle an anderen RUNs arbeiten, separat gespeichert werden. Diese enthalten Informationen, über die geeinete Index-Auswahl bei einem RUN in einem TEST. Beispiel: kopiere *.s3 nach \*.s3_22981_r2 [/B]


[B]Für ein gleichzeitiges Berechnen der Phase 2 während er Phase 1 :[/B]
[B]Erstelle auch hier ein neues Verzeichnis, Beispiel C:\Phase2_1\[/B]
[B]und kopiere alle PRIMO - Dateien hinein. Kopiere die aktuelle[/B]
[B]tmp-Datei rein und editiere diese. Setze pe=2 ![/B]
[B]Je nach Stand der fertigen TESTs in Phase 2 ,lösche bei jedem [/B]
[B]neuen tmp-file das Minus „-„ vor jedem „Type=“. So springt [/B]
[B]PRIMO an die neue Stelle, wo noch kein fertiger TEST in Phase 2 vorliegt.[/B]
[B]Die fertigen TESTs in Phase 2 werden wieder separat in ein neues [/B]
[B]„vorzeitiges Zertifikat“ angehängt. Lösche bei jedem fertigen [/B]
[B]TEST bei Phase 2 die Zeilen sf=, pm= ( ist ein Fehler bei PRIMO )[/B]

[B]Zum Schluss , muss über das Zertifikat die Signierung (Verification)[/B]
[B]komplett durchlaufen.[/B]

[B]Fertig ![/B]

Cybertronic 2009-08-07 19:02

2^33548+4471 with PRIMO
 
First Report:

After 8 days :
I'm on TEST 24 (32995/33549). ( 9933 digits ) :groupwave:
So Phase 1 need only 110-120 days.
I hope it's done before 2010.

Cybertronic 2009-08-22 09:04

It is very cumbersome and sluggish.

Now I'm on TEST 56 31898/33548 Phase 1 and TEST 44 Phase 2.

Elapsed time: 23 days.:sick:

ET_ 2009-09-01 08:37

Update
 
Phase 1, Test 269, Run 1, Bits 19774/26796.

I catched up with my last backup failure. Things are getting faster now. :smile:

Luigi

Cybertronic 2009-09-02 18:57

Luigi, good luck ! :rolleyes:
....
Stand: Phase 1 TEST 85 (30940/33549): Phase 2 TEST 1-82 done

henryzz 2009-09-03 07:16

anyone fancy reserving the new one:smile:

philmoore 2009-09-07 03:42

Gary (gd_barnes): I had forgotten that I had not verified the certificate you sent me while I was on vacation, but I just finished verifying it, and will forward it on to Marcel Martin. Nice work!

Cybertronic 2009-09-13 19:21

Hello, downrun sequenz of "2^33548+4471" have reached the actual PRIMO record. I will more optimize my methode and I think this certificate is done between 20th and 25th nov. 09.[U]

Best, Norman


[/U]

engracio 2009-09-18 20:09

[quote=Cybertronic;183574]Hier eine Anleitung in Deutsch, bei Fragen , fragen !

[B]Anleitung zur parallelen Nutzung von PRIMO auf einem[/B]

[B]Multicore-System[/B]


[B]Anmerkung:[/B]
[B]Die Spezialversion von PRIMO V 3.0.6 (special) ist zu Begin am besten geeignet, da diese für große Zahlen „tiefer“ arbeitet und die ersten [/B]
[B]TEST’s mit höherer Wahrscheinlichkeit beendet. Einen zeitlichen[/B]
[B]Verlust gegenüber V 3.0.7 gibt es nicht. Dennoch kann PRIMO schon ab 8000 Stellen überfordert sein. [/B]

[B]Verfahren:[/B]
[B]Es gibt 5 Tabellen RUN1,2,3,4,5 und ein RUN6.[/B]
[B]Öffnet man die tmp-Datei, gibt es 3 wichtige Parameter.[/B]
[B]1.[/B][B]pe=1,2,3 : 1 – Phase 1 , 2- Phase 2 , 3- tmp wird in out umgeschrieben[/B]
[B]2.[/B][B]ar=1,2,3,4,5,6 : hier wird RUN bei einem TEST festgelegt, welcher ausgeführt werden soll[/B]
[B]3.[/B][B]ap= ??? : hier wird der letzte Stand des Indexes des RUNs eingetragen[/B]
[B]Es ergeben sich Indexzahlen für RUN 1,2,3,4,5,6 wiefolgt:[/B]
[B]RUN 1: ap= 1..97500 etwa[/B]
[B]RUN 2: ap= 1..153000 etwa[/B]
[B]RUN 3: ap= 1..212000 etwa[/B]
[B]RUN 4: ap= 1..272000 etwa[/B]
[B]RUN 5: ap= 1..139500 etwa[/B]
[B]RUN 6: ap= 1..2^25-1 -> entspricht delta = - ******[/B]

[B]Je nach Coreanzahl kann man PRIMO mehrmals starten, ohne Zeitverlust.[/B]
[B]2 Möglichkeiten gibt es:[/B]
[B]Entweder man ändert ar bei einem weiteren Task oder [/B]
[B]ar bleibt gleich und man staffelt ap geeignet um schneller ein RUN zu beenden. [/B]

[B]Wie geht man vor ?[/B]
-[B]Erstelle je nach Coreanzahl gleichartige PRIMO Verzeichnisse Beispiel: C:\P1 , C:\P2, ...[/B]
-[B]kopiere alle Programmdateien in jedes Verzeichnis[/B]
-[B]Erstelle eine *.in Datei und initialisiere diese[/B]
-[B]Bei Phase 1 RUN 1 , abbrechen und die *.tmp in jedes Verzeichnis kopieren [/B]
-[B]jetzt kann schon editiert werden, ar=1 und ar=2 und ar=3,... und mehrere Aufgaben rechnen an verschiedenen Stellen[/B]
-[B]Jeder ! Schritt muss zu Begin dokumentiert werden, ich mache es mit „Excel“, damit im Falle eines erfolglosen TESTs ein manueller Backtrack leichter fällt.[/B]
-[B]ist ein TEST abgeschlossen , wird abgebrochen und alle ap’s werden für ein späteres (falls Fehlschlag) Zurücksetzen dokumentiert[/B]
-[B]die neue tmp-Datei wird geeignet gespeichert , in einem anderen Verzeichnis...Beispiel als *.Test2_32981 „(bits)“ und die anderen tmp’s in den übrigen Verzeichnissen mit der neuen überschrieben.[/B]
-[B]auch die .s?? Datei sollte bei jedem Verzeichnis, falls alle an anderen RUNs arbeiten, separat gespeichert werden. Diese enthalten Informationen, über die geeinete Index-Auswahl bei einem RUN in einem TEST. Beispiel: kopiere *.s3 nach \*.s3_22981_r2 [/B]


[B]Für ein gleichzeitiges Berechnen der Phase 2 während er Phase 1 :[/B]
[B]Erstelle auch hier ein neues Verzeichnis, Beispiel C:\Phase2_1\[/B]
[B]und kopiere alle PRIMO - Dateien hinein. Kopiere die aktuelle[/B]
[B]tmp-Datei rein und editiere diese. Setze pe=2 ![/B]
[B]Je nach Stand der fertigen TESTs in Phase 2 ,lösche bei jedem [/B]
[B]neuen tmp-file das Minus „-„ vor jedem „Type=“. So springt [/B]
[B]PRIMO an die neue Stelle, wo noch kein fertiger TEST in Phase 2 vorliegt.[/B]
[B]Die fertigen TESTs in Phase 2 werden wieder separat in ein neues [/B]
[B]„vorzeitiges Zertifikat“ angehängt. Lösche bei jedem fertigen [/B]
[B]TEST bei Phase 2 die Zeilen sf=, pm= ( ist ein Fehler bei PRIMO )[/B]

[B]Zum Schluss , muss über das Zertifikat die Signierung (Verification)[/B]
[B]komplett durchlaufen.[/B]

[B]Fertig ![/B][/quote]

Does anybody have any update on this? I tried the online translator and it is not so good.

philmoore 2009-09-18 20:42

I started a translation when I was on vacation, but never got back to it once I got distracted by the new prp. I'll take another look at it, post a rough translation, and ask any knowledgeable German speakers to suggest revisions. Thanks for the reminder.

Cybertronic 2009-09-22 14:20

PRIMO on a Multicore
 
Here is my actual excel-table.
Maybe you can understand, how it works.

[URL]http://www.sendspace.com/file/nj8efr[/URL]

BTW:
r= this RUN is done. x= minor, a RUN was abort, because another way was better

an index number in a cell: here was stopped , because another RUN in this TEST terminated this TEST


Norman

ET_ 2009-10-01 14:14

Update
 
2[sup]26795[/sup] + 57083 primality testing entered phase 2! :smile:

Luigi

engracio 2009-10-01 14:30

I've been waiting for 2^25563+22193 to go to phase 2 since last month after it hit test 525 but alas still on phase 1. Maybe tomorrow. It is almost on test 696.:huh:

Cybertronic 2009-10-01 15:34

[quote=engracio;191622]I've been waiting for 2^25563+22193 to go to phase 2 since last month after it hit test 525 but alas still on phase 1. Maybe tomorrow. It is almost on test 696.:huh:[/quote]

Congratulation !


I think, you will have Phase 2 , 10h later of your last posting.
My tip, you have 970 TEST total :smile:


Me too , my certificate is done in 7 weeks. Thank goodness !

engracio 2009-10-02 12:29

[quote=Cybertronic;191629]Congratulation !


I think, you will have Phase 2 , 10h later of your last posting.
My tip, you have 970 TEST total :smile:


Me too , my certificate is done in 7 weeks. Thank goodness ![/quote]


Well normi it was not 10h later since I am only on phase 1 test 911.:huh: Maybe Sat my time.:smile: Do you know how many test is on 2^26727+77783. Thanks.


EDIT:

Wow! I stand corrected normi. After typing this post, I checked the test again and it has jumped to test 930 and climbing steadily. I think the proggie is just cleaning up and ready to finish phase 1. W00T:grin:

engracio 2009-10-02 12:54

Phase 1 completed 1027 test.:smile:

Cybertronic 2009-10-02 13:16

[quote=engracio;191699] Do you know how many test is on 2^26827+77783. Thanks.[/quote]

Between 1065-1075.



BTW , at this time I have exact TEST 200! :smile: at Phase 1 , so 27153/33549 bits left. Still larger than the other numbers to the beginning ...

If you have guts to split your tmp-file into 4 tasks (on your 2.6 GHz Phenom X4), you will done next weekend.

Cybertronic 2009-10-02 18:06

[quote=Cybertronic;191706]
If you have guts to split your tmp-file into 4 tasks (on your 2.6 GHz Phenom X4), you will done next weekend.[/quote]

Should you split for Phase 2 then :

Core1 make TEST 1-50
Core2 51-150
Core3 151-399
Core4 400-1027

The signification need 1 day

So the certification is 3-4 weeks earlier done.

Cybertronic 2009-10-27 06:32

Good news. The downrun of the first 10000 bits are done. So 7060 digits left and this are peanuts. In 4-5 weeks I also done with this huge number.

Best

ET_ 2009-11-06 17:40

I restarted my check after 28 days spent in Australia :smile:

Phase 2
Test 146
Bits 22968/26796

Luigi

Cybertronic 2009-11-07 19:38

Status of "2^33548+4471"

[url]http://www.sendspace.com/file/85fte7[/url]

:ouch2:

ET_ 2009-11-20 14:11

2^26795+57083 is prime!
 
2^26795+57083 is a certified prime!

Primo completed its certification today. :smile:

Phil, let me know about the files you need to run the verification, and people who need to be contacted in case the verification completes correctly.

I guess there is room in Prof. Caldwell's prime database for this little beast...

Luigi

Cybertronic 2009-11-20 14:31

Congratulation Luigi ! :smile:

philmoore 2009-11-20 15:55

[QUOTE=ET_;196492]2^26795+57083 is a certified prime!

Primo completed its certification today. :smile:

Phil, let me know about the files you need to run the verification, and people who need to be contacted in case the verification completes correctly.

I guess there is room in Prof. Caldwell's prime database for this little beast...

Luigi[/QUOTE]

Very cool, Luigi! By coincidence, Engracio just sent me the file for 2^25563+22193 which also completed its certification this week, and I am running the verification on it at the moment. It should finish today, and I can do yours next. What I need is the big OUT file, it is probably over 3 Mbytes in size. You can verify it yourself, but if you want me to do it, I would be happy to. moorep lanecc edu with at and dot inserted is my email address. Norman's monster will be the next to complete...

Cybertronic 2009-11-20 16:31

"Norman's monster will be the next to complete..."

Oh yes Phil :smile:.

Maybe next weekend. I'm now at 16500 bits (TEST 598).
Also runs the verification during Phase1 and 2.
So I need not wait once more 48 h for a valid certificate, e.g.
Phase 1 , Phase 2 and the verification is done on the same day.

ET_ 2009-11-20 17:22

???
 
My verification only took 2.93 seconds...

The result:

Selected=1
Processed=1
Valid=1
Certificate #1=Valid, 2.93s

Status_Valid signature

Luigi

Cybertronic 2009-11-20 17:25

[quote=ET_;196505]My verification only took 2.93 seconds...

The result:

Selected=1
Processed=1
Valid=1
Certificate #1=Valid, 2.93s

Status_Valid signature

Luigi[/quote]

Luigi, yes, but when you set "no hook" in the verification, so it taks about 30h for your number.
PRIMO proof every point , not just the signature.

ET_ 2009-11-20 17:29

Oh, I see... :smile: Thank you for the hints.

Started a new run after dechecking "Check signature only".

Luigi

philmoore 2009-11-21 17:35

I have now confirmed Engracio's prime, and am running a second verification on Luigi's.

ET_ 2009-11-22 00:43

[QUOTE=ET_;196509]Oh, I see... :smile: Thank you for the hints.

Started a new run after dechecking "Check signature only".

Luigi[/QUOTE]

[code]
[PRIMO - Task Report]
Version=3.0.7
WebSite=http://www.ellipsa.net/
Task=Verification
ID=B322303F61F06
Created=11/20/2009 06.27.41 PM

[Common]
Path=F:\Luigi\Maths\Primo\work\Standard\Verification\
Selected=1
Processed=1
Valid=1
Certificate #1=Valid, 28h 29mn 52s

[Certificate #1]
Input=primo-B315E04EDCB53-00.out
Status=Valid certificate
[/code]

:et_:

Luigi

philmoore 2009-11-23 17:05

I see that Luigi's prime is now listed as 19th, and Norman's last prime is listed as 16th on Chris Caldwell's Top 20 primes proven by ECCP:
[url]http://primes.utm.edu/top20/page.php?id=27[/url]
Of course, when Norman's current prime finishes, and gets listed at 7th (assuming nothing larger is proven in the meantime) these two will be pushed down a notch.

Way to go!

Cybertronic 2009-11-23 19:20

[quote=philmoore;196763]I see that Luigi's prime is now listed as 19th, and Norman's last prime is listed as 16th on Chris Caldwell's Top 20 primes proven by ECCP:
[URL]http://primes.utm.edu/top20/page.php?id=27[/URL]
Of course, when Norman's current prime finishes, and gets listed at 7th (assuming nothing larger is proven in the meantime) these two will be pushed down a notch.

Way to go![/quote]

At this time , Mike Oakes test also a gigantic PRP and he is on Phase 2.
I believe , my is a little bit larger :smile:

Since Juli 2008 he run PRIMO on a single task. It is a race between 2 huge PRPs, but Friday this week I'm done .


Theoretical, I can prove 2^38090+47269 in 180 days, but not yet.

Cybertronic 2009-11-26 23:37

Yeah, you don't believe it !!!!!!!

The monster number is now proven prime !

Read more details at page

[url]http://www.sendspace.com/file/bfp9xu[/url]

Elapsed time only 119 days.

all the best

Norman

philmoore 2009-11-27 00:24

119 days! That is fantastic, but of course it required a lot of work from you in addition to computer time. Congratulations, Norman!

ET_ 2009-11-27 11:22

Nice job Norman! :smile:

Now I'll be on the last place of Caldwell's database...

Luigi

Cybertronic 2009-12-04 20:25

Maybe, the number "2^38090+47269" we can't certify with PRIMO.
Now I'm on RUN 6 delta=-45000.
:ermm:

engracio 2009-12-04 21:00

Norman I've decided to try your method and I just need to clarify a few things.

I am on Test 228 and have copied all the files to folders Primo1, Primo2, Primo3. I change the *.temp file and ar=1 for run 1, ar=2 for run 2 and ar=3 for run 3. I also change ap=1 for each run if I wanted to start from index 1.

When one of the run completes to the next test, here it would be Test 229. I would then stop all other run and copy the *.temp to folder Primo1 to start run1 on Test 229, run 2 on folder 2 and run 3 on folder 3. Is that good so far???

Cybertronic 2009-12-04 22:06

[quote=engracio;197810]Norman I've decided to try your method and I just need to clarify a few things.

I am on Test 228 and have copied all the files to folders Primo1, Primo2, Primo3. I change the *.temp file and ar=1 for run 1, ar=2 for run 2 and ar=3 for run 3. I also change ap=1 for each run if I wanted to start from index 1.

When one of the run completes to the next test, here it would be Test 229. I would then stop all other run and copy the *.temp to folder Primo1 to start run1 on Test 229, run 2 on folder 2 and run 3 on folder 3. Is that good so far???[/quote]

Yes Engracio.
But also using a Editor ,like Excel, and memorize from TEST 228 the 3 index numbers of RUN 1,2,3, because you find easier the latest position for a manual backtracking.
Save the new tmp file in another directory like "C:\back\" and copy *.tmp to *.228_18791(bit) or so, if TEST 229 a failure.

When you download the record certificate (10099ecpp.zip) then you get my logbook in ecxel. I think this is very useful.

engracio 2009-12-05 00:05

[quote=Cybertronic;197821]Yes Engracio.
But also using a Editor ,like Excel, and memorize from TEST 228 the 3 index numbers of RUN 1,2,3, because you find easier the latest position for a manual backtracking.

[B]What is the purpose of saving the index and how? How do I save the index? Is it after one of the runs i.e. run 3 found the next test, do I save the index of run 1 and run 2 before stopping it and going to the next test found by run 3???[/B]

Save the new tmp file in another directory like "C:\back\" and copy *.tmp to *.228_18791(bit) or so, if TEST 229 a failure.

[B]I do that now, make sense, it will let me go back to a known test in case the new one is a dead end.[/B]

When you download the record certificate (10099ecpp.zip) then you get my logbook in ecxel. I think this is very useful.

[B]What is a delta? Also I tried to use one of the core to run Phase 2 but it seems to just set there. When I took off the " - " on test 1, it jumped to test 2 bypassing test 1.[/B]

[/quote]

[B]^^^^^^^[/B]

[B]Thanks.[/B]:smile:

Cybertronic 2009-12-05 07:16

[B]What is the purpose of saving the index and how?

Example:
You jump from TEST 228 RUN 3 index=2901 to TEST 229...
and this TEST 229 is a dead end (avoid RUN6 , it takes to many time in Phase 2) ..then you can go directly to TEST 228 RUN1 index=latest stand. PRIMO start automatic a backtrack and go to TEST 228 RUN3 index=2903.

How do I save the index?
In a table per hand.

Is it after one of the runs i.e. run 3 found the next test, do I save the index of run 1 and run 2 before stopping it and going to the next test found by run 3???[/B]

Yes.

[B]What is a delta?
PRIMO call it index for RUN 1..5, for RUN 6 is it delta


Also I tried to use one of the core to run Phase 2 but it seems to just set there. When I took off the " - " on test 1, it jumped to test 2 bypassing test 1.

Edit the nearest newest tmp-file and set "pe=2" and take off all "-"
of your done TESTs in Phase 2. Copy the new ready point ,like [3],[4]...[10]... in a advance certificate. Attach it in logical order.
Kill in every ready TEST in Phase 2 "sf=" and "pm="

In your case, you set only pe=2. PRIMO can calculate the first 228 TEST..and it takes a while.


[/B]

engracio 2009-12-05 18:23

So Norman, as long as the certification is moving from one test to another then it is working correct??

Well test 229 have to run (6) delta.:cry: Run 1..3 just jumped to the next run. I saved the index on excel for run 4 (index 195984)and run 5 (index 36479).

Now for Phase 2. With the most current *.temp test 229, all I have to do is change pe=1 to pe=2 and let it run? It will eventually move from test 1 to test 2???

Do I need any of the other files to run Phase 2 or just the *.temp file???

Cybertronic 2009-12-05 18:49

[quote=engracio;197926]So Norman, as long as the certification is moving from one test to another then it is working correct??

YES !

Well test 229 have to run (6) delta.:cry: Run 1..3 just jumped to the next run. I saved the index on excel for run 4 (index 195984)and run 5 (index 36479).

Oh ! RUN 6 is bad, but it is okay.

When you look up to the end of the tmp file , in your case "TEST 228"
then you will see, where PRIMO found the parameters for TEST 229.
It is rn=6 ( the RUN ) and pm=*** ( that is the index number +2, for backtracking ). Theoretical you can notice rn and pm in TEST[228] Phase 1 and delete complete in the tmp-file TEST 228. Set "TestCount=227" and
set to begin ar=rn of 228 amd ap=pm of 228 , ar=rn+1 and ap=1 for core 2 and so on. Make a secure copy of the old tmp-file. Also you can try
another point with rn=4 and rn=5 with the TEST 228 tmp-file. There are good chances.

Now for Phase 2.
With the most current *.temp test 229, all I have to do is change pe=1 to pe=2 and let it run?

YES !


It will eventually move from test 1 to test 2???

PRIMO start with Phase 2 on TEST 1

Do I need any of the other files to run Phase 2 or just the *.temp file???

No, just the tmp-file you need.

[/quote]


....

engracio 2009-12-06 16:10

Okay Norman you are right, I changed pe=1 to pe=2 to run Phase 2 and just let it run. Now after 18 hours it is on test 3.:smile:

Now the big question. Test 229 moved to Test 330 by running run 6 or delta. I decided to just continue what I was doing for Test 330 and started running run1..4 where all 4 completed and moved to the next run. I am now on run 5 and run 6 and both are still running after 19 hours. Question is if run 5 moves to the next test Test 331, is it okay to continue normally? If run 6 or delta moves to Test 331, what do I do? After 19 hours is it okay to continue and let the test run or should I go back to a previous test like test 227 or 228?

Cybertronic 2009-12-06 16:30

[quote=engracio;198007]Okay Norman you are right, I changed pe=1 to pe=2 to run Phase 2 and just let it run. Now after 18 hours it is on test 3.:smile:

Now the big question. Test 229 moved to Test 330 by running run 6 or delta. I decided to just continue what I was doing for Test 330 and started running run1..4 where all 4 completed and moved to the next run. I am now on run 5 and run 6 and both are still running after 19 hours. Question is if run 5 moves to the next test Test 331, is it okay to continue normally? If run 6 or delta moves to Test 331, what do I do? After 19 hours is it okay to continue and let the test run or should I go back to a previous test like test 227 or 228?[/quote]

I don't understand. TEST 230 or 330 ?
Have you edit the primo.ini and add
[Setup+]
MSC=26
?
With MSC=26 you have much more possibilities to finished a TEST.
Avoid RUN 6 ! It takes to many times in Phase 1 and 2.
Is RUN 1 2,3 done then start RUN 4 , 5 and a previous way , like TEST 229 , RUN 1 or 2 or 3 ( a RUN which is not done ) ,index = latest stand of the RUN which not done.


"Question is if run 5 moves to the next test Test 331, is it okay to continue normally?"

Yes, you start TEST 331 with RUN = 1,2,3...
Note, prior you can test a TEST , whether PRIMO start automatic RUN 2 or 3, So you can start with RUN 1 and 3, 4. 2 is most automatic.

"If run 6 or delta moves to Test 331, what do I do? After 19 hours is it okay to continue and let the test run or should I go back to a previous test like test 227 or 228?"

You go back, is RUN 1,2,3,4 and 5 a dead run. For <20000 bit numbers is
every 30th TEST a dead run.

I'm glad of your decision :smile: !

engracio 2009-12-06 16:39

[quote=Cybertronic;198009]I don't understand. TEST 230 or 330 ?
Have you edit the primo.ini and add
[Setup+]
MSC=26
?
With MSC=26 you have much more possibilities to finished a TEST.
Avoid RUN 6 ! It takes to many times in Phase 1 and 2.
Is RUN 1 2,3 done then start RUN 4 , 5 and a previous way , like TEST 229 , RUN 1 or 2 or 3 ( a RUN which is not done ) ,index = latest stand of the RUN which not done.


"Question is if run 5 moves to the next test Test 331, is it okay to continue normally?"

Yes, you start TEST 331 with RUN = 1,2,3...
Note, prior you can test a TEST , whether PRIMO start automatic RUN 2 or 3, So you can start with RUN 1 and 3, 4. 2 is most automatic.

"If run 6 or delta moves to Test 331, what do I do? After 19 hours is it okay to continue and let the test run or should I go back to a previous test like test 227 or 228?"

You go back, is RUN 1,2,3,4 and 5 a dead run. For <20000 bit numbers is
every 30th TEST a dead run.

I'm glad of your decision :smile: ![/quote]


Ooops typo error.:smile: This is what I type in "Setup+]
MSC=20..26 ". I suppose it should have been MSC=26, changing it now.:sick:

Okay Test 229 have run 4 and run 5 not completed. I will backtrack to those 2 runs and hopefully it finds another path to the next test.

I will also continue to run 5 test 230 hoping it also moves to the next test.

Cybertronic 2009-12-06 16:39

[quote=engracio;198007]Okay Norman you are right, I changed pe=1 to pe=2 to run Phase 2 and just let it run. Now after 18 hours it is on test 3.:smile:
[/quote]


Okay, so you can building slow the final certificate. You can copy the first 2 TEST and delete the sf= and pm=

Copy your tmp-file to an out file.

Like:

"
[PRIMO - Primality Certificate]
Version=3.0.7
WebSite=http://www.ellipsa.eu/
Format=3
ID=B31B1019AB7EB
Created=07.30.2009 07:31:07 AM
TestCount= putting the exact number , when Phase 1 is done (maybe 920)
Status=Candidate certified prime

[Comments]
Project: Five or Bust

[Running Times]
Total=119 days : 2856h

[Candidate]
File=E:\PRIMO307\gig.in
Expression=Your number
N$= ????
HexadecimalSize=8388
DecimalSize=10099
BinarySize=33549

[1]
..

"

Cybertronic 2009-12-06 16:47

BTW, 2^38090+47269" is very brutal. A single task will take 1 month to complete all 6 RUNs of the first TEST.

engracio 2009-12-06 17:10

I am not sure what you mean by doing this? Also this procedure is for later when Phase 2 has done more test??

You must remember I am on just moving from test to test right now.:smile: One step at a time unless it is necessary to prevent problems 2 months later.:grin:

[quote=Cybertronic;198012]Okay, so you can building slow the final certificate. You can copy the first 2 TEST and delete the sf= and pm=

Copy your tmp-file to an out file.

Like:

"
[PRIMO - Primality Certificate]
Version=3.0.7
WebSite=http://www.ellipsa.eu/
Format=3
ID=B31B1019AB7EB
Created=07.30.2009 07:31:07 AM
TestCount= putting the exact number , when Phase 1 is done (maybe 920)
Status=Candidate certified prime

[Comments]
Project: Five or Bust

[Running Times]
Total=119 days : 2856h

[Candidate]
File=E:\PRIMO307\gig.in
Expression=Your number
N$= ????
HexadecimalSize=8388
DecimalSize=10099
BinarySize=33549

[1]
..

"[/quote]

engracio 2009-12-06 17:15

[quote=Cybertronic;198013]BTW, 2^38090+47269" is very brutal. A single task will take 1 month to complete all 6 RUNs of the first TEST.[/quote]

And you know what you are doing.:geek:

Okay Test 230 run 5 is still running index 119340. Test 229 run 4 and run 5 are running again picking up from the index recorded on my excel.

I hope one of the runs find the path to the next test.

Cybertronic 2009-12-06 17:23

[quote=engracio;198014]I am not sure what you mean by doing this? Also this procedure is for later when Phase 2 has done more test??
[/quote]

I mean it is a little training:smile:. The first 2 TESTs of Phase 2 are done, so you have a tiny part of the certification now.

You should append all TESTs of Phase 2 in the finally file. The finally file you get, when you copy the actual tmp-file to *.out.
Delete all lines from [X] to the end of file.
Insert the done TESTs of Phase 2 after "BinarySize=" line in logical order.

Cybertronic 2009-12-06 17:35

[quote=engracio;198015]
Okay Test 230 run 5 is still running index 119340. Test 229 run 4 and run 5 are running again picking up from the index recorded on my excel.
I hope one of the runs find the path to the next test.[/quote]

A hint: It is very useful to save all *.s** files of RUN 1,2,3,....
Is PRIMO on TEST 230 , you find *.s230.
Go PRIMO on TEST 230 , RUN 1, index = 2301 to TEST 231 , then you can copy *.s230 to a seperat directory , like :\run_s\ *.230_bit_r1.

Have PRIMO the *.s file, so can PRIMO finished faster this RUN.
In the *.s file are informations about the optimal index selection.
If you lose *.s-file , so PRIMO takes more time to finished a RUN.

engracio 2009-12-06 17:43

[quote=Cybertronic;198016]I mean it is a little training:smile:. The first 2 TESTs of Phase 2 are done, so you have a tiny part of the certification now.

You should append all TESTs of Phase 2 in the finally file. The finally file you get, when you copy the actual tmp-file to *.out.
Delete all lines from [X] to the end of file.
Insert the done TESTs of Phase 2 after "BinarySize=" line in logical order.[/quote]

Got it.:tu:

engracio 2009-12-06 17:46

[quote=Cybertronic;198019]A hint: It is very useful to save all *.s** files of RUN 1,2,3,....
Is PRIMO on TEST 230 , you find *.s230.
Go PRIMO on TEST 230 , RUN 1, index = 2301 to TEST 231 , then you can copy *.s230 to a seperat directory , like :\run_s\ *.230_bit_r1.

Have PRIMO the *.s file, so can PRIMO finished faster this RUN.
In the *.s file are informations about the optimal index selection.
If you lose *.s-file , so PRIMO takes more time to finished a RUN.[/quote]

Okay I have just started saving *.s from test 228 so from now on I will save them too. Thanks.

edit:

btw Norman, when I tried to open the *.s files it just show some non readable junk. Can I open the file or not??

Cybertronic 2009-12-06 18:26

[quote=engracio;198021]
btw Norman, when I tried to open the *.s files it just show some non readable junk. Can I open the file or not??[/quote]


You can open it, but you get letter salad :smile:.
It is not a txt-file

engracio 2009-12-06 18:38

[quote=Cybertronic;198023]You can open it, but you get letter salad :smile:.
It is not a txt-file[/quote]
Okay so nothing to see on the *.s file. Thanks I just thought I was doing something wrong.

Cybertronic 2009-12-07 15:56

A hint for the Phase 2 procedure.

Before you append the next done TESTs of Phase 2, compare the last

S$=*** of [XYZ] in your certificate with your actual tmp-file at TEST [XYZ].

Is it not equal , so is the done TEST of Phase 2 invalid. It is the case
if you chosen another way. I mean TEST [XYZ] of Phase 2 is valid, but you have depraved this point during Phase 1 through a backtrack.

engracio 2009-12-07 19:22

[quote=engracio;198011]Ooops typo error.:smile: This is what I type in "Setup+]
MSC=20..26 ". I suppose it should have been MSC=26, changing it now.:sick:

Okay Test 229 have run 4 and run 5 not completed. I will backtrack to those 2 runs and hopefully it finds another path to the next test.

[B]Norman saving the index for Test 229 run 4 and run 5 enabled the test to move on now at Test 335. The other run 5 on Test 330 was a dead end.[/B]

I will also continue to run 5 test 230 hoping it also moves to the next test. [B]Dead end[/B] :sad:[/quote]

^^^

Cybertronic 2009-12-07 19:41

You mean , you are now at [B]TEST 235[/B] ? TEST 230 RUN 4 was the only way ?
Do you believe , it is now faster ? IF you now at TEST 235 then I think you are in few days (1-2) at TEST 260.

engracio 2009-12-07 20:42

[quote=Cybertronic;198116]You mean , you are now at [B]TEST 235[/B] ? TEST 230 RUN 4 was the only way ?
Do you believe , it is now faster ? IF you now at TEST 235 then I think you are in few days (1-2) at TEST 260.[/quote]

Yes definitely faster than the last two days. It even completed test 232 and test 234 while I was not around.:smile: Both were run 1 completion.

Talking about Phase 2 I am now on test 6 maybe even on test 7 now. What do you mean by append to the file or even better yet give an example on how to start the merging of phase 1 and phase 2 files. Can you try to merge the two phase before either phase is completed??

Cybertronic 2009-12-07 21:06

[quote=engracio;198120] What do you mean by append to the file or even better yet give an example on how to start the merging of phase 1 and phase 2 files. Can you try to merge the two phase before either phase is completed??[/quote]

Procedure:
----------

1. create an out file , look like #174
2. in your case : copy alle done TESTs [1]..[(228 , S$= the same)] of Phase 2 into your out file. Delete sf= and pm= in each TEST :-(

3. yet you need [229 , 230,...] : After copying you overwrite the tmp file with the newest tmp file and set pe=2. Take off "-" from [1]..[228] and start PRIMO. PRIMO jump to TEST 229 Phase 2. I use the old Norton Comander 2.0 for Windows. Its easy to kill automatic all "-" of Type=-***
After this you rewrite with NC 2.0 from [229] to EOF "Type=-"

4. If you have any new done TESTs of Phase 2, you append it in the out-file. But compare the last S$= TEST of out-file with the newest tmp-file)

Cybertronic 2009-12-12 08:44

Big surprise ! I'm on TEST 2 :smile:
At TEST 1 RUN 6 delta = -14 M

Maybe it is possible to certify "2^38090+47269"

Cybertronic 2009-12-13 10:36

Good news, I will extended my PRIMO record and I take the number "2^38090+47269" :smile:

Now I'm on TEST 4 , 38029/38091.

engracio 2009-12-13 14:57

[quote=Cybertronic;198704]Good news, I will extended my PRIMO record and I take the number "2^38090+47269" :smile:

Now I'm on TEST 4 , 38029/38091.[/quote]

Good job Norman. You'll probably finish before I do.:smile: I got stuck on a few test and just broke out of it to test 260. I ran into test 257 and almost completed all 5 runs and ending up backtracking to test 256 twice. Each time it backtracked and found the next test it was a different bit. Finally found the good test and moved thru test 258.:grin:

Cybertronic 2009-12-13 15:33

[quote=engracio;198721] Finally found the good test and moved thru test 258.:grin:[/quote]


Sounds good ! I believe , you are now on 19900 bit. 5 days ago on 20600 bits. Save all ways and take ever the way with the lowest bit.
Well done !

engracio 2009-12-20 14:03

Norman I am moving along and on Test 303/19010bit. My phase 2 test is on test 22 also moving along.

I think I got the Phase 1 rhythm of saving the new test/*.tmp to backup, over writing the old *.tmp with the new test *.tmp and running run 1..5. Luckily I have not done any Run 6/delta. Run 1..5 have always managed to jump to the next test or I was able to go back to a previous test and move up to the next test from there.:smile: Now it is just waiting for the 950 odd phase 1 test to complete.

Question on phase 2, my current *.tmp running phase 1 is only up to test 229. As I stated I am now on test 303. What is the best way to multi task phase 2 if I have another core??

Should I copy/append test 230 to the end of test 229 or on a different folder with a different core start phase 2 on test 230???

Which is better, delete test 1..229 or take out [B]Type=-4 [/B]up to test 229and run pe=2/phase 2?

I know you said we need to copy all of the completed/ready test to a pre-certificate file prior to merging all files and running the certification. Thanks.:smile:

Cybertronic 2009-12-20 14:29

Multicore Phase 2
 
[quote=engracio;199387]
Which is better, delete test 1..229 or take out [B]Type=-4 [/B]up to test 229and run pe=2/phase 2?

BTW , there are 4 Types :smile:.

[/quote]

No! You can't delete any TESTs ! So you will destroy the certificate.

Create for each core a new directory, like Phase2_1,Phase2_2 ...
Put in all PRIMO files include the tmp-file you will split.

To begin , save all done Phase2 TEST [1..22] in a "master"-file.

Example: a second core will also calculate Phase 2.
- Copy the tmp-file,like the TMP-file with TEST [1..228] to \Phase2_2
- Kill the "-" of each Type=-? [1..4] for TEST [1] to TEST[100], set pe=2

- start PRIMO, Primo did start Phase 2 at TEST 101
- When you calculate TEST 230 , 231,... then kill the "-" FOR TEST 1 to TEST 229 , set pe=2 and compare the S$ of TEST 229 old file with the new tmp-file. Is it equal , so okay . Is not, so was on TEST 229 a backtrack and look then TEST 228, 227 and so on.

engracio 2009-12-20 14:41

[quote=Cybertronic;199390]No! You can't delete any TESTs ! So you will destroy the certificate.

[/quote]

That is very GOOD thing to know.:bow:


[quote=Cybertronic;199390]

Create for each core a new directory, like Phase2_1,Phase2_2 ...
Put in all PRIMO files include the tmp-file you will split.

To begin , save all done Phase2 TEST [1..22] in a "master"-file.

Example: a second core will also calculate Phase 2.
- Copy the tmp-file,like the TMP-file with TEST [1..228] to \Phase2_2
- Kill the "-" of each Type=-? [1..4] for TEST [1] to TEST[100], set pe=2

- start PRIMO, Primo did start Phase 2 at TEST 101
- When you calculate TEST 230 , 231,... then kill the "-" FOR TEST 1 to TEST 229 , set pe=2 and compare the S$ of TEST 229 old file with the new tmp-file. Is it equal , so okay . Is not, so was on TEST 229 a backtrack and look then TEST 228, 227 and so on.[/quote]

Okay I am doing that now.:smile:

Cybertronic 2009-12-20 15:04

BTW , I'm now at TEST 16..37802/38091.

When you work correct, you should be done with Phase 1 at 31th december 09:smile:


All times are UTC. The time now is 15:42.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.