mersenneforum.org

mersenneforum.org (https://www.mersenneforum.org/index.php)
-   LMH > 100M (https://www.mersenneforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=46)
-   -   332.2M - 333.9M (aka 100M digit range) (https://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=10693)

LaurV 2015-05-02 10:57

That is what I said in post #481. We got someone with power on his hand, let him take the expos he likes. Most of the guys with reservations there, we will never see them again. And Uncwilly, you don't need to feel guilty about anything, we all know the lots of effort you put into this range, from the very beginning.

aurashift 2015-05-02 13:44

I found out something interesting. I gave each of these cores a 100M job. It seems like they're only being assigned TF work, which is fine. That's what I wanted. (Even if it was supposed to take an exponent to a deeper bit level, instead of just doing one bit and moving on) :banana:

usslcburnin44 10 111,009,599 TF 4 2015-04-28 2015-04-28 2015-04-29 2015-04-30 -2
usslcburnin44 10 111,009,641 TF 4 2015-04-28 2015-04-28 2015-04-29 2015-04-30 -2
usslcburnin44 10 111,009,733 TF 4 2015-04-28 2015-04-28 2015-04-29 2015-05-01 -1
usslcburnin44 10 111,009,751 TF 4 2015-04-28 2015-04-28 2015-04-29 2015-05-01 -1
usslcburnin44 10 111,009,887 TF 4 2015-04-28 2015-04-28 2015-04-29 2015-05-02 -1

On the other blades I have running the 332M range, it'll keep the TF, P-1, and LL assignment on the same worker thread, maybe since those have AVX and 11 threads to work with.

Uncwilly 2015-05-02 13:48

I was stating what I did because I have changed my strategy. Instead of hitting only the unassigned, I am going after the lowest exponents. And if Cheesehead ever comes back to us, I wanted to point out that there was no motion going on by the others.

Currently I have a dual core laptop running 72->73. A quad core taking 73->74. 2 of 4 cores on another box going from 74->75, the other 2 working on the first 6 of 77->78 (once they are done they will go to 74->75). And another quad core taking 75->76.

aurashift 2015-05-11 16:41

Looks like my first results will come 28 days later, apparently with zombies.:banana:

aurashift 2015-05-18 19:49

I got all the blades off of TF work and onto LL... thanks for the help guys. I think I'll put the RAMBeasts back onto P-1

Uncwilly 2015-05-18 22:31

[QUOTE=aurashift;402567]I got all the blades off of TF work and onto LL... thanks for the help guys. I think I'll put the RAMBeasts back onto P-1[/QUOTE]

I noticed that you got a nice P-1 factor in the 91 or 92 bit range. :)

aurashift 2015-05-19 00:25

[QUOTE=Uncwilly;402582]I noticed that you got a nice P-1 factor in the 91 or 92 bit range. :)[/QUOTE]

That wasn't on a RAMBeast. That's why I was getting a little irked, that was 8,10, or 12 cores that had a bunch of wasted time.....22 days. Just looked it up.

Uncwilly 2015-05-21 04:05

2 Attachment(s)
Here is the status report for the range from 332192831 to 332399999 (plus other data out to 332999999):

[code]Date of data 2015/05/20
Average bit depth for first 100 expos 78.93
Average bit depth for first 1000 expos 77.92
Average bit depth for first 5000 expos 75.86
Average bit depth for first 10000 expos 74.60
100th active expo (no factor found) 332198423
1000th active expo (no factor found) 332246639
5000th active expo (no factor found) 332446859
10000th active expo (no factor found) 332690087
Unitless total effort number 329,973,760
Number of first 100 expos to 2^78 100
Number of first 100 expos to 2^79 80
Number of first 1000 expos to 2^78 583
Number of first 5000 expos to 2^77 1393
Number of first 10000 expos to 2^76 2934
Number left in range 4072

Estimated expos in range to be removed 150
(by taking all expos to 2^79)
Estimated expos in range to be removed 293
(by taking all expos to 2^82)
[/code]
[code]Bit # at bit level
73 352
74 278
75 897
76 1202
77 519
78 101
79 676
80 33
81 13
82 0
83 0
84 0
85 1
P-1 408[/code]
For the following bit levels, these are the 'hold-up' numbers (they are the lowest exponent that is factored to less than the indicated bit level.
80 - 332192831
79 - 332192969
78 - 332200711
77 - 332205547
76 - 332269319
75 - 332322643
74 - 332366347
73 - 332791241

Left graphic is the count of exponents remaining from 332192831 to 332999999 by bit level.
The right one is the actual bit levels of the first ~4200 exponents. The arrows indicate the status at the time of the last update.

aurashift 2015-05-31 16:18

Just FYI that big wave of blades I thought would be here by now should be coming in soon...

Uncwilly 2015-06-01 01:31

[QUOTE=aurashift;403289]Just FYI that big wave of blades I thought would be here by now should be coming in soon...[/QUOTE]
I'll hold my breath until then. :sick:

[COLOR="White"]Not really. I do appreciate all of the work that you have done in this range.[/COLOR]

aurashift 2015-06-02 00:38

[QUOTE=Uncwilly;403312][COLOR="White"]I do appreciate all of the work that you have done in this range.[/COLOR][/QUOTE]

You're very welcome, although I'm getting it by default since it's adequately TF'd, which is very nice.


All times are UTC. The time now is 22:25.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.