[QUOTE=Uncwilly;324755]
I have a few reserved at the beginning of that range. Let me know if you want me to dump them. I can move elsewhere to stay out of your hair.[/QUOTE]

Don't worry, I am working on non-reserved :smile:

EDIT: Unless you assigned them recently?

[QUOTE=kracker;324709]Taking 332.5 to 71.[/QUOTE]
[STRIKE]I will reach that range in one or two days, taking all 332M to 73 (first step in taking them to 75). There are about 700 left in 332M4 (status shows 1000, but it is from yesterday, the one for today is not updated yet), and I do about 300-400 per day.
[/STRIKE]
[Edit: scrap this! I was looking to totally different data. Reaching 332.5 will be sometime end of Jan, beginning of Feb. However the question stands].

The question is: would you like me to skip this range and go directly to 332M6 or not?

(i.e. if you intend to work longer on them, then I will skip, otherwise I will re-generate my worktodo to take out the work you already did (as per yesterday status, because "today" one is not updated yet, you had taken 903 expos from 70 to 71).

Here is the status report for the range from 332192831 to 332399999 (plus a bit more):

[code]Date of data 2013/01/20
Average bit depth for first 1000 expos 78.44
Average bit depth for first 1000 expos 77.25
Average bit depth for first 5000 expos 73.97
Average bit depth for first 10000 expos 72.27
100th active expo (no factor found) 332198423
1000th active expo (no factor found) 332246153
5000th active expo (no factor found) 332441237
10000th active expo (no factor found) 332674843
Unitless total effort number 190,685,184
Number of first 100 expos to 2^77 90
Number of first 1000 expos to 2^76 914
Number of first 5000 expos to 2^77 800
Number of first 10000 expos to 2^76 1410
Number left in range 4167

Estimated expos in range to be removed 243
(by taking all expos to 2^79)
Estimated expos in range to be removed 386
(by taking all expos to 2^79)
[/code]

21,543,792 effort equivalent of P-1 done.
4,128,715 effort that has been applied to numbers that have had factors found.[code]Bit # at bit level
72 842
73 1391
74 241
75 369
76 542
77 311
78 36
79 405
80 24
81 5
82 0
83 0
84 1
P-1 249[/code]The first 650+ exponents are now 76 bits or higher.
The first 1650+ exponents are at 74 or higher. By next monthly report, all the exponents to 332599999 should be at 72 or higher. Thanks to some GPU work, we have made good progress this month. I have moved a core onto P-1's in the range.

The attached graph shows the exponent count by bit level in a stacked bar format. It are pretty and shows the progress nicely.

[QUOTE=Uncwilly;325347]
Estimated expos in range to be removed [COLOR=Red]243[/COLOR]
(by taking all expos to 2^[COLOR=Red]79[/COLOR])
Estimated expos in range to be removed [COLOR=Red]386[/COLOR]
(by taking all expos to 2^[COLOR=Red]79[/COLOR])
[/QUOTE]
:shock:

[QUOTE=Uncwilly;325347]Estimated expos in range to be removed 243
(by taking all expos to 2^79)
Estimated expos in range to be removed 386
(by taking all expos to 2^79)[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=LaurV;325348]:shock:[/QUOTE]
Ooops, the second one should be:
Estimated expos in range to be removed 386
(by taking all expos to 2^[COLOR="DarkOrange"]82[/COLOR])

And the note the following correction:
Average bit depth for first 100[STRIKE]0[/STRIKE] expos 78.44

[QUOTE=LaurV;325336]
The question is: would you like me to skip this range and go directly to 332M6 or not?

(i.e. if you intend to work longer on them, then I will skip, otherwise I will re-generate my worktodo to take out the work you already did (as per yesterday status, because "today" one is not updated yet, you had taken 903 expos from 70 to 71).[/QUOTE]

I am running though them only at about ~150 GHZ/days a day, you can go though the rest of them, much, MUCH faster, go ahead :smile:

I just realized I did a mistake, instead of filling into the batch file the starting point from 332M2, I only put 332M, so I (involuntarily) took the 332M1 exponents ([URL="http://www.mersenne.info/trial_factored_tabular_delta_7/3/332000000/"]481 of them remained [/URL]from previous marathon, also by myself, in April-May-June last year) from 70 to 71, finding 10 factors on the way. This is somehow bad, as I wasted my ticks, but is somehow good, because [URL="http://www.mersenne.info/trial_factored_tabular_data/3/332000000/"]this table[/URL] will have no "70" column in two weeks (hopefully) ...

[QUOTE=LaurV;326308]but is somehow good, because [URL="http://www.mersenne.info/trial_factored_tabular_data/3/332000000/"]this table[/URL] will have no "70" column in two weeks (hopefully) ...[/QUOTE]I like that. I saw the count changing on Primenet, but did not see the change showing up in the exponents in the range above 33219xxxxx.

The 332M range is now at 59% factored.
:busy:

Here is the status report for the range from 332192831 to 332399999 (plus a bit more):

[code]Date of data 2013/02/20
Average bit depth for first 100 expos 78.44
Average bit depth for first 1000 expos 77.26
Average bit depth for first 5000 expos 74.25
Average bit depth for first 10000 expos 72.67
100th active expo (no factor found) 332198423
1000th active expo (no factor found) 332246153
5000th active expo (no factor found) 332441693
10000th active expo (no factor found) 332677003
Unitless total effort number 193,957,888
Number of first 100 expos to 2^77 90
Number of first 1000 expos to 2^76 924
Number of first 5000 expos to 2^77 802
Number of first 10000 expos to 2^76 1445
Number left in range 4161

Estimated expos in range to be removed 230
(by taking all expos to 2^79)
Estimated expos in range to be removed 373
(by taking all expos to 2^82)
[/code]
21,918,624 effort equivalent of P-1 done.
4,147,147 effort that has been applied to numbers that have had factors found.
(60.5% of the numbers in the range from 332192831 to 332399999 have been factored out.)
[code]Bit # at bit level
73 2125
74 296
75 381
76 575
77 313
78 35
79 406
80 24
81 5
82 0
83 0
84 1
P-1 254[/code]The number of exponents assigned to L-L's in the 332 range by PrimeNet is currently: 2450.
Prior to the announcement of M48, we were running in the range of 1500-1600.
The attached graph shows the distribution of known factors for the range out to 332599999.
[attach]9375[/attach]

Can you please post the actual version of the graphic attached to post #421? (right when I got used with the format and I start to like it, you change it! :razz:)