[QUOTE=LaurV;306163]I finished the 332M-333M range to 70.[/QUOTE]
I had taken notice of that. That is why I chose the graphic that I did, to show off your handy work.
Thanks for all of the cycles that you have thrown our way. Anytime you want to do more.....

[QUOTE=c10ck3r;306245]Reserving 334M (all) to 66. This batch will take me about a week. Potentially taking to 67 next month. IK its not technically in this subproject, but I imagine there would be a several mil expansion once TF is done to an appropriate level for all y'all's range...[/QUOTE]y'all do what you want up there. I will watch the number of exponents factored out.

If you want something meaty, those at 74 (in the 332.2 to 333.9 zone) that need moving up to 79 are quite a few.

[QUOTE=c10ck3r;306245]Reserving 334M (all) to 66. This batch will take me about a week. Potentially taking to 67 next month. IK its not technically in this subproject, but I imagine there would be a several mil expansion once TF is done to an appropriate level for all y'all's range...

PS "all y'all's" is as close to Proper Hick as I can get.
Layers of y'all
Y'all: you
all y'all: all of y'all
All Y'all's: Belonging to all y'all (see above)[/QUOTE]

Done. Factors reported and whatnot.

Here is the status report for the range from 332192831 to 332399999 (plus a bit more):

[code]Date of data 8/20/2012
Average bit depth for first 100 expos 78.41
Average bit depth for first 1000 expos 77.17
Average bit depth for first 5000 expos 73.43
Average bit depth for first 10000 expos 71.81
100th active expo (no factor found) 332198357
1000th active expo (no factor found) 332246143
5000th active expo (no factor found) 332438999
10000th active expo (no factor found) 332671189
Unitless total effort number 175,611,904
Number of first 100 expos to 2^77 89
Number of first 1000 expos to 2^76 885
Number of first 5000 expos to 2^77 776
Number of first 10000 expos to 2^76 1383
Number left in range 4202

Estimated expos in range to be removed 274
(by taking all expos to 2^79)[/code]
[code]Bit # at bit level
71 618
72 1423
73 334
74 401
75 130
76 534
77 299
78 30
79 404
80 25
81 5
P-1 208[/code]
Colorful picture shows the current total effort expended by bit level.

Yesterday Sergey Nosov turned in results on 332250257. He took it from 80 to 82. Our first 82 bit number!:party:

Hey, Now!

[QUOTE=Uncwilly;309800] Our first 82 bit number![/QUOTE]duh! you made me go for it on PrimeNet... You sound it so happy I thought he found a factor :smile:

[QUOTE=Uncwilly;309800]Yesterday Sergey Nosov turned in results on 332250257. He took it from 80 to 82. Our first 82 bit number!:party:[/QUOTE]
That's great! Well done Sergey Nosov! I suppose you mean in the 100M range? Otherwise at [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_factoring_effort/?exp_lo=1&exp_hi=1000000000&bits_lo=82&bits_hi=82&B1=Get+Data"]^82[/URL] you have three more and at [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_factoring_effort/?exp_lo=1&exp_hi=1000000000&bits_lo=83&bits_hi=83&B1=Get+Data"]^83[/URL] you have:

[URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=383838383&exp_hi=&B1=Get+status"]383838383[/URL]
[URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=999999937&exp_hi=&B1=Get+status"]999999937[/URL]

Within [URL="http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=3210&page=38"]Operation Billiion Digits[/URL] you also find lots of them!

Here is the status report for the range from 332192831 to 332399999 (plus a bit more):

[code]Date of data 10/20/2012
Average bit depth for first 1000 expos 77.18
Average bit depth for first 5000 expos 73.54
Average bit depth for first 10000 expos 71.86
1000th active expo (no factor found) 332246143
5000th active expo (no factor found) 332439829
10000th active expo (no factor found) 332671883
Unitless total effort number 178,034,688
Number of first 1000 expos to 2^76 885
Number of first 5000 expos to 2^77 778
Number of first 10000 expos to 2^76 1384
Number left in range 4198

Estimated expos in range to be removed 270
(by taking all expos to 2^79)[/code]
[code]Bit # at bit level
71 404
72 1593
73 320
74 454
75 129
76 525
77 309
78 30
79 404
80 24
81 5
82 1
P-1 229[/code]Someone has been putting a fair amount of effort to lifting all of the exponents at 70 in the 332's up to 71.

[QUOTE=Uncwilly;315416]Someone has been putting a fair amount of effort to lifting all of the exponents at 70 in the 332's up to 71.[/QUOTE]
?? I thought this was done months/years ago, even before I was raising all 333 and 332 to 69, respective 70 bits (that time 332.x was already to 71 for few smallest x'es, as it is today, no progress since, or very small in this direction) ... Or do we talk about different ranges?

[QUOTE=LaurV;315900]I thought this was done months/years ago, even before [/QUOTE]
Check out the current status here: [url]http://mersenne.info/trial_factored_bar_graph/3/332000000/[/url]
Then click on "A month ago". All of that fresh orange sure looks nice.

[QUOTE=Uncwilly;309800]Yesterday Sergey Nosov turned in results on 332250257. He took it from 80 to 82. Our first 82 bit number!:party:[/QUOTE]
Oops, he did it again. From 82 to 83. That is a 2,948 GHz-Days credit!!
:raccoon: