[QUOTE=TheJudger;236983]According to [URL]http://mersenne.org/primenet/[/URL] 360GHz-Days per week are allready ~0.2% of the total primenet throughput! :w00t:

Oliver[/QUOTE]

According to the TF top producers report for 11/06-11/12, in that timeframe 786 people submitted 17,839.541 GHzd of TF results. 360 GHzd would be 2% of the total TF effort, roughly... :big grin:

[QUOTE=ET_;236951][code]
no factor for M332200639 from 2^74 to 2^75 [mfaktc 0.12 75bit_mul32]
no factor for M332200639 from 2^75 to 2^76 [mfaktc 0.12 barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M332200639 from 2^76 to 2^77 [mfaktc 0.12 barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M332200639 from 2^77 to 2^78 [mfaktc 0.12 barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M332200639 from 2^78 to 2^79 [mfaktc 0.12 barrett79_mul32]
[/code]

About 360 GHz/days in a week :smile:

Luigi[/QUOTE]

I gotta get me one of those...whatever that is you have!!!!

Hi,

I just submitted my 3rd factor of a 100M digit number found by mfaktc :smile:

1st: M332204107 has a factor: 89756216614454495373649
2nd: M332220631 has a factor: 403178911233667515397289
3rd: M332212043 has a factor: 74979864753377829344927

While the first (76.25 bit) and third (75.99 bit) factor are within the typical TF range the second one is above the typical limit of 2^77. The second factor is 78.42 bit. With a k = 2 * 2 * 5845139 * 25952929 it is a little bit outside of the "typical" P-1 range, right?

Oliver

[QUOTE=TheJudger;237879]While the first (76.25 bit) and third (75.99 bit) factor are within the typical TF range the second one is above the typical limit of 2^77. The second factor is 78.42 bit. With a k = 2 * 2 * 5845139 * 25952929 it is a little bit outside of the "typical" P-1 range, right?[/QUOTE]
Well here is the current break down for found factors in the range from 332192857 to 32599979:
[CODE]Bit Count
71 11
72 14
73 9
74 7
75 7
76 2
77 3
78 1
79 0
80 0
81 0
82 0
83 0
84 1
85 0
86 0
87 0
88 0
89 0
90 0
91 0
92 1
[/CODE]
I don't know for sure, but I think that only the 84 and the 92 are P-1 finds. I think that all the rest are TF's. The table excludes the 15088 below 71.

[QUOTE=Uncwilly;237890]Well here is the current break down for found factors in the range from 332192857 to 32599979:
[CODE]Bit Count
71 11
72 14
73 9
74 7
75 7
76 2
77 3
78 1
79 0
80 0
81 0
82 0
83 0
84 1
85 0
86 0
87 0
88 0
89 0
90 0
91 0
92 1
[/CODE]
I don't know for sure, but I think that only the 84 and the 92 are P-1 finds. I think that all the rest are TF's. The table excludes the 15088 below 71.[/QUOTE]

Did you check if any of those factors is composite?

Luigi

[QUOTE=ET_;237930]Did you check if any of those factors is composite?[/QUOTE]Just did for those 2, both prime. And the 77's and the 78.

Maybe PrimeNet should check reported factors for primality.

[QUOTE=Uncwilly;237973]Maybe PrimeNet should check reported factors for primality.[/QUOTE]Hasn't it been doing that?

Here is a status report for the range from 332192831 to 332399999:

[code]Date of data 11/20/2010
Average bit depth for first 100 expos 76.62
Average bit depth for first 1000 expos 74.84
100th active expo (no factor found) 332198357
1000th active expo (no factor found) 332244137
Unitless total effort number 52400384
Number of first 100 expos to 2^75 97
Number left in range 4363

Estimated expos in range to be removed 577
(by taking all expos to 2^82)[/code]
[code]Bit # at bit level
69 553
70 2326
71 475
72 122
73 76
74 240
75 215
76 123
77 116
78 5
79 103
80 8
81 1
P-1 77[/code]The attached graph plots the progress in terms of effort number. It demonstrates the profound effect that the GPU's have had. It also shows how much of the 'effort' is represented by exponents at the various bit levels.
[attach]5912[/attach]

Here is a status report for the range from 332192831 to 332399999:

[code]Date of data 12/20/2010
Average bit depth for first 100 expos 77.06
Average bit depth for first 1000 expos 75.07
100th active expo (no factor found) 332198357
1000th active expo (no factor found) 332244257
Unitless total effort number 64308480
Number of first 100 expos to 2^75 98
Number left in range 4355

Estimated expos in range to be removed 568
(by taking all expos to 2^82)[/code]
[code]Bit # at bit level
69 353
70 2324
71 639
72 146
73 53
74 255
75 178
76 133
77 121
78 6
79 129
80 17
81 1
P-1 81[/code]
We have almost all of the first 1250 up to 71. Most all of the LL assignments are with in that range. I currently have 2 real cores and 2 HT 'cores' pushing expos up to 74 and 1 HT each moving expos up to 71 and 72. Once all 1250 are up to 71, I will move that HT core to a higher bit level. I continue to watch for availability of stragglers. When they show up, I snag them and boost them to at least the same bit level as their neighbors.

The attached graph shows the current bit level for all the expos in range. The arrows mark where things were last month.

Hi Uncwilly,

I like your stats! :smile:
Any stats on factors? (number of factored numbers, factor sizes, ...)

Oliver
P.S. I've just reported two new factors for 100M digit numbers. :smile:

[QUOTE=TheJudger;243144]Any stats on factors? (number of factored numbers, factor sizes, ...)[/QUOTE]Ja.

Well here is the current break down for all the found factors in the range from 332192857 to 32599979 (this is a broader range, I can break it down to just the short range if anyone really wants it):
[CODE]Bit Count
29 667
30 420
31 516
32 640
33 623
34 613
35 578
36 578
37 525
38 550
39 511
40 485
41 490
42 494
43 474
44 471
45 467
46 454
47 417
48 415
49 403
50 402
51 386
52 358
53 282
54 324
55 313
56 274
57 251
58 176
59 199
60 175
61 183
62 167
63 142
64 165
65 153
66 118
67 75
68 69
69 65
70 26
71 11
72 14
73 9
74 7
75 9
76 4
77 3
78 1
79 0
80 0
81 0
82 0
83 0
84 1
85 0
86 0
87 0
88 0
89 0
90 0
91 0
92 1
[/CODE]
A total of 11955 exponents have been factored out. 15175 factors have been found. Average bit level 44.3 Effective 'effort' (less the 2 factors presumed to be found by P-1): 793,274