![]() |
1 Attachment(s)
Here is the delayed monthly status report for the range from 332192831 to 332399999
[code]Date of data 08/20/2009 Average bit depth for first 100 expos 73.42 Average bit depth for first 1000 expos 71.76 100th active expo (no factor found) 332197819 1000th active expo (no factor found) 332242187 Unitless total effort number 7136384 Number of first 100 expos to 2^72 83[/code][code]Bit # to bit level or higher 68 4463<-all left in range 69 2802 70 1454 71 665 72 485 73 386 74 291 75 242 76 33 77 15 P-1 21[/code] Attached is a graph that shows the progress over the past few months. [attach]4022[/attach] |
Just picked up another one from the "Most wanted list": 332194351
I moved it in front of all other work so that it will be released at 2^75 by next Friday. In the meantime 332194939 and 332197627 were released at 2^75 (plus a few more). |
[QUOTE=Sunfish;189434]Just picked up another one from the "Most wanted list": 332194351
I moved it in front of all other work so that it will be released at 2^75 by next Friday.[/QUOTE]I have been checking status frequently and been able to pick up several in the first 1000 that are at 69. I just want to move them up to 70. (This is where I am working with a particular core. That and taking the 68's to 69). |
[QUOTE=Sunfish;189434]Just picked up another one from the "Most wanted list": 332194351[/QUOTE]
It has a factor!!!!!! 7182072097187110425833 72.6 bit level k=10810045498316 :party: Thanks! |
Yes, this was a real quick one. Just noticed it this morning. Seems like you must be running some kind of watchdog?!
Your most wanted list is now completed, except 332192831 & 332205217 which still need P-1. Currently I have 3 cores working in the area below 332199999 moving available expos up to 2^75. Any preference on your side or some new "most wanted" expos? |
[QUOTE=Sunfish;189580]Any preference on your side or some new "most wanted" expos?[/QUOTE]Well, at the moment:
332193457 is the first expo below 74 332194979 is the first expo below 73 332194999 is the first expo below 72 332201021 is the first expo below 71 But, what you are doing is great. No, watch dog, I just did a general status check and noticed that the numbers looked odd. The number of expos at 72 went down and the number at 73+ didn't go up. So, I checked the graphs. Then grabbed the latest factor data for the range. |
I have picked up some exponents in the 332.39 range (via the server) to start moving them from 68 to 69. These should progress fairly well as long as my son doesn't play games too much on the laptop. The first one took between 10-12 hours.
Grant. |
[QUOTE=gjmccrac;189674] from 68 to 69. The first one took between 10-12 hours.[/QUOTE]What machine are you running on? 1 core on my machine takes about 5-6 hours to take a number from 69->70 (and that is twice the work.)
All help is welcome. |
[QUOTE=Uncwilly;189590]Well, at the moment:
332193457 is the first expo below 74 332194979 is the first expo below 73[/QUOTE]I picked up one near here. Taking to 74. |
[QUOTE=Uncwilly;189729]What machine are you running on? 1 core on my machine takes about 5-6 hours to take a number from 69->70 (and that is twice the work.)[/QUOTE]
It is running on a Mobile AMD Athlon XP 2500+. |
[QUOTE=gjmccrac;189745]It is running on a Mobile AMD Athlon XP 2500+.[/QUOTE]Would you mind running a benchmark for me, please? My [url=http://mersenne-aries.sili.net/throughput.php?cpu=AMD+Athlon+2500%2B+Mobile|512|0&mhz=1900]throughput data for that CPU[/url] only has (limited) FFT data, a fuller standard benchmark would be appreciated :smile:
|
| All times are UTC. The time now is 21:51. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.