Here's an example of a new worktodo.txt (I don't know of some full documentation about the new format, but the only big difference is the Worker #1 line):[code][Worker #1]
Test=43000019,68,1[/code]Besides the Worker #1 line, I notice it shows you put an M in front of the number. Edit: Oh, the only problem was the M. I guess the worker lines are only necessary to differentiate with multiple workers, and is not necessary for a single worker thread.

Is your small machine a dual core? I expect it'd change the number of CPUs to use to your number of CPUs if you enter a number higher than your number of CPUs (if that makes any sense :smile:).

Adding work to v95.6
 

perhaps this post will help
[URL]http://www.mersenneforum.org/newreply.php?do=newreply&p=137277[/URL]

You may also want to look at some other posts in the thread rather tedious I admit. Also works for other types of work.

nelson

Thanks for your help !
 

Thanks for your help, guys ! I've understood.
I'll add some post in the "Perpetual Benchmark" Thread soon.
Tony

What about posting the

cat /proc/cpuinfo

output ... there you can see what features you do have (real cores or hyperthreaded).