![]() |
[QUOTE=davieddy;140929]0.0224 sec/iter means ten days for 40M iterations.[/QUOTE]
Please keep in mind that we were running on lower performing code prior to today so that figure has limited bearing on the DC run as a whole. :innocent: |
[QUOTE=T.Rex;140875]I'll see tomorrow which FFT length is used now by Glucas. I remember I've seen several messages at the beginning saying that Glucas has increased the FFT length in order to reduce the level of error under the required limit.[/QUOTE]As Ernst said, no way to say the FFT length. However, yes, Glucas had 4 "roundoff" errors and at the end it decided to change the FFT length:
[FONT="Georgia"][I]Restarting. Changed FFT length[/I].[/FONT] T. |
[quote=rgiltrap;140937]Please keep in mind that we were running on lower performing code prior to today so that figure has limited bearing on the DC run as a whole. :innocent:[/quote]
Since 13 days have passed since the initial discovery, you can rest assured I am bearing that in mind.:smile: |
[quote=T.Rex;140938]As Ernst said, no way to say the FFT length. However, yes, Glucas had 4 "roundoff" errors and at the end it decided to change the FFT length:
[FONT=Georgia][I]Restarting. Changed FFT length[/I].[/FONT] T.[/quote] That must be disappointing for you. More power to my suggestion that 2048K is inadequate! |
Well, I hope you get that 30% speed increase working!
|
[quote=ixfd64;140947]Well, I hope you get that 30% speed increase working![/quote]
??? |
See post #273.
|
30% done
30% done on my side. Still late...
|
[quote=ixfd64;140949]See post #273.[/quote]
Are you having difficult keeping up to the pace of posting? I think the rate of growth of this thread is probably record-breaking. |
[QUOTE=T.Rex;140938]As Ernst said, no way to say the FFT length. However, yes, Glucas had 4 "roundoff" errors and at the end it decided to change the FFT length[/QUOTE]
I must say, I find that very surprising - apparently the accuracy loss from Glucas' fast-multiply-up-of-roots-of-unity-and-DWT-weights scheme is significantly more than I expected. [b]"And the specially modified Lamborghini blows the doors off the garage..."[/b] Here are timings for the same 16-thread 4096K FFT running on 4 quad-cores of the Sparc VII: [i][Sep 04 08:11:23] Mxxxxxxxx Iter# = 2**00000 clocks = 00:33:51.000 [ 0.0203 sec/iter] Res64: CC42FF0C3E6FDD1E AvgMaxErr = 0.000002711. MaxErr = 0.000003815[/i] |
[QUOTE=rgiltrap;140925]As of today we have the nice new Mlucas code release working which means we have a bit more speed and a lot more reliability in terms of restart capability (just in case if anything goes pear shaped).[/QUOTE]
So Ernst, are you going to make this shiny new Mlucas code available to everyone when this is all over? :tu: I don't have any Ferrari's or Lamborghini's in my garage, and I can't even use any special Bull Linux tricks. I'm just hoping to squeak in a finish before Tony even though I had quite a head start... :cry: |
| All times are UTC. The time now is 22:54. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.