mersenneforum.org

mersenneforum.org (https://www.mersenneforum.org/index.php)
-   Prime Sierpinski Project (https://www.mersenneforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=48)
-   -   New PRP found (https://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=10505)

ltd 2008-07-27 18:26

New PRP found
 
Sloth did it again. :banana::paul::philmoore:

we have a new PRP. Its 258317*2^5450519+1

Official proving is in progress:

[url]http://primes.utm.edu/primes/page.php?id=85350[/url]

As we have rechecked the number on two different machines already(Thanks to Joe_O) we are quite sure that it is really prime.

So the k is removed from all queues and a new sieving dat file is created and can be downloaded at the usual place.

Thanks to all the contributors here and at primegrid who made it possible to find a new prime within such a short time.

Stats will show it as soon as the prime is official.

:bow wave::party::bow wave:

mdettweiler 2008-07-27 20:08

Hmm...since it was done with LLR (which does a Proth test, not a PRP test, on k*2^n+1 numbers), shouldn't the title say "new prime found" instead of "new PRP found" (since "PRP" would indicate that it's only a probable prime)?

Wacky 2008-07-27 21:55

[QUOTE=Anonymous;138414]shouldn't the title say "new prime found" instead of "new PRP found" (since "PRP" would indicate that it's only a probable prime)?[/QUOTE]

No, it is still "probable" until they complete all of the verification tests that they feel are necessary to assure that there was not an error in the computation which might have led to a false positive.

mdettweiler 2008-07-27 22:22

[quote=Wacky;138417]No, it is still "probable" until they complete all of the verification tests that they feel are necessary to assure that there was not an error in the computation which might have led to a false positive.[/quote]
Well, since they've already checked it three times by now, I'd say the chances of it being composite are just about nil. :wink:

Wacky 2008-07-27 22:32

I don't disagree with your assessment. However, WE are not in a position to make a declaration. I am sure that THEY will amend their declaration when THEY are ready.

ltd 2008-07-28 17:36

There are three reasons why I wrote PRP.
First and most important it was a reflex comming from the start of the project when everything was PRP and had to be rechecked by other programms.

Second I think it is worth to call it PRP until it is checked by an independant source using different tools.

Third I never really thought about the wording.

Nekto 2008-07-28 20:37

Good job! :banana::wblipp::skiing::philmoore::paul::et_::groupwave::bounce wave:

axn 2008-07-29 04:02

Sigh. I know I've said it many times before, but... Y'all need to better coordinate with Prof. Caldwell so that such BIG primes are not verified by prime pages again -- it achieves nothing more than tying up the prime pages machines.

Oh, and big congrats to everyone :party:

Jean Penné 2008-07-29 04:45

Many congrats to everyone! I think you are now really competing with SoB...
Best Regards,
Jean

Death 2008-07-29 07:23

Nice to hear! You guys are the best!

That's mean not only new prime, but also overall speed increase in sieving.

Now I want new prime in [B]SoB[/B] ))))

Death 2008-07-29 07:25

And btw, everybody can grab some primality check program and check it by yourself. ;-)


All times are UTC. The time now is 16:10.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.