[QUOTE=Batalov;140901]Congratulations to Bruce, too!
348131628285692590860028784957527660987485049321208797343 (p57)
and a top10 hit.[/QUOTE]

Thanks! Bumped, and replaced, my even smaller p57 out of the
10th spot. I doubt any of the p57's will last long, epfl has had
some 20 BMtR numbers in the past 2 months, seems like just a
matter of time.

On Bob's encouragement, I wasn't looking for a p57, rather checking
so that p52-p55's would be less likely. One fewer snfs candidate
from among c260-c320, with the c212 cofactor a less immediately
attractive candidate (other things being equal). If we'd sieved the
c269 (as if! we should be so lucky), we'd have people describing the
p57 as a miss; so now that's not going to happen with the c212
(at least, for this p57). The number's just at 4.5*t50, which is above
the 4*t50 of a generic c190-c233, still not ready for sieving; but
likely not an immediate candidate, either. -Bruce