[QUOTE=MyDogBuster;275862]I'll see if I can get R79 in some kind of working arrangement. After all its only 86M tests.[/QUOTE]

Sorry to burst your bubble, but I just got an 8-core Mac Pro yesterday and started R79.

[QUOTE]Sorry to burst your bubble, but I just got an 8-core Mac Pro yesterday and started R79. [/QUOTE]

Have fun:grin:

OK, Ian, Mark, Mathew, or Peter, just let me know if you're reserving any of the huge bases so that we don't duplicate any effort.

Ha-ha; that sounds like I'm talking to some people from biblical times. :smile:

[QUOTE=gd_barnes;275899]OK, Ian, Mark, Mathew, or Peter, just let me know if you're reserving any of the huge bases so that we don't duplicate any effort.

Ha-ha; that sounds like I'm talking to some people from biblical times. :smile:[/QUOTE]

I will be doing R79. I was actually hoping to surprise everyone here a few weeks, but instead was surprised that someone was willing to take it on.

[QUOTE=gd_barnes;275899]OK, Ian, Mark, Mathew, or Peter, just let me know if you're reserving any of the huge bases so that we don't duplicate any effort.
[/QUOTE]

OK, to make it official: I scripted R63 to n=2000. I then sieved 2002<n<10001 to optimal depth.

As soon as my network problems are fixed I will upload the script output for Gary and the sieve file for Ian. In case Ian is not interested in testing the candidates, I will do them with not-so-high priority as a side effort to the other stuff I am working on.

[QUOTE=Puzzle-Peter;275995]OK, to make it official: I scripted R63 to n=2000. I then sieved 2002<n<10001 to optimal depth.

As soon as my network problems are fixed I will upload the script output for Gary and the sieve file for Ian. In case Ian is not interested in testing the candidates, I will do them with not-so-high priority as a side effort to the other stuff I am working on.[/QUOTE]

OK I'll just show R63 with "no testing done" and no reservation right now. When you send me the k's remaining at n=2000, I'll show the # of k's and top 10 primes, although will not show the actual k's remaining, similar to what I did with S63 after KEP originally tested it to n=1000.

Scripting results and sieve file are uploaded to sendspace. You should have received an email. If not, please let me know.

I just realised I said the sieve n=2000 to 25000 in one post. That's not correct. The other post is right where I say it's n=2000 to n=10000. Sorry about that!

Ian, if you're going to LLR this please remind me to send you the primes with 2000<n<10000 I found during my speed tests. The candidates I tested (~2M candidates) are not in the uploaded file, so there won't be any duplicate work.

[QUOTE]Scripting results and sieve file are uploaded to sendspace. You should have received an email. If not, please let me know.[/QUOTE]Got it. Wow, a 1.08gb ABCD sieve file. It will take me a while to determine what to do with this. Thanks for the effort Peter.

Sendspace works great for this stuff guys.

[QUOTE]Ian, if you're going to LLR this please remind me to send you the primes with 2000<n<10000 I found during my speed tests. The candidates I tested (~2M candidates) are not in the uploaded file, so there won't be any duplicate work. [/QUOTE]Please send me the primes so I can get a feel for the "hit rate".

[QUOTE=MyDogBuster;276175]
Please send me the primes so I can get a feel for the "hit rate".[/QUOTE]

OK, will do so next week when I get back to my machines.

Reserving R60 to n=100K.

R63
 

I'm going to take a pass on R63. What a tremendous amount of work that would be. I commend Peter for even getting it to 2K.

It was not the actual testing that is the problem, but the manual juggling
needed to handle the 440M tests.

Peter, I have 351 primes that I found while testing. I'll send them to you to lighten the load a bit. Thanks for sending me the files. It was quite an eyeful.