![]() |
[QUOTE=gd_barnes;193523]The pattern is that I don't see any primes for n<1000 nor for n>5000. lol Anyway, I'm assuming that this is for n=1000-5000. Correct? I also assume that I need to run the n<1000 primes myself. On base 3, I just have people send me the n>1000 primes because the file of smaller primes is too huge.
I don't know how big the file of n<1000 primes is. If it is < ~5 MB compressed, can you Email it to me? That'd save me a little time. For base 3, it's just too big but I'm thinking it wouldn't be so big here. Gary[/QUOTE] Hi Gary, you spotted the situation well. I still have the zipped primes with n <= 1000, but I didn't doublecheck this part. It totals 6.6 MB. I can try to send/upload it. Whereto? Willem. |
[QUOTE=gd_barnes;193529]How high did you test it? The results only go up to n=180K but you had it reserved to n=200K.
Gary[/QUOTE] Yup, I mean that I have completed it to 200k. I ran part of it backwards on a different PC, that is how the residues got lost. Willem. |
[CODE]167974*19^25035+1
363376*19^25160+1 353506*19^25174+1 65386*19^25180+1 568686*19^25352+1 443584*19^25417+1 56986*19^25420+1 174096*19^25492+1 3706*19^25538+1 706894*19^25791+1 705766*19^25798+1 [/CODE] |
Riesel Base 87
Reserving Riesel Base 87 n=25K-100K
|
Sierp Base 75
Sierp Base 75 complete n=25K-40K
1 prime found and proven - Results attached - Base released 2500*75^38755+1 |
[quote=Siemelink;193496]Hi all,
here are the remaining k for riesel base 40. I have taken this to n = 5000, I won't go further. As a double check I've done the range n = 1 to n = 1000 twice. They really don't have primes. I did not double check those k that were prp with n < 1000. If you like, I can post the script I use to generate the k's. Cheers, Willem.[/quote] Very nice work Willem. I ran my usual double check for n=1-2000 on new bases. Everything balanced with your primes and k's remaining, which included removal of k's where k=m^2 and m==9 or 32 mod 41 (per the algebraic factors thread) and k's that are divisible by 40 where k-1 is composite. To make it official: Riesel base 40 has 4306 k's remaining at n=5K. Details will be on the web pages in a little while. Ian, Riesel base 40 with a conjecture 2-1/2 times larger than Riesel base 39 has less k's remaining at n=5K than base 39 does at n=10K. It might be one worth taking to n=10K or 15K in the near future. It dropped nicely from 7095 k's remaining at n=2K to 4306 remaining at n=5K. It is clearly a fairly prime base. Gary |
Reserving Sierp bases 39 and 40 to n=10K.
With these two bases at n=10K and 5K respectively on the Riesel side and conjectures far smaller, it's time to get them going. On 2 cores, it should take 1.5-2 weeks at the most. Once complete with this effort, only Sierp base 35 will remain to get all Sierp bases <= 50 (except 3/7/15) tested to n=10K. The only base remaining on the Riesel side to complete the same is base 40, which thanks to Willem's recent large effort on it, only needs to be tested from n=5K-10K. With my next web pages update shortly, I'm going to post the general info. for Sierp bases 35, 39, and 40. Gary |
Sierp Base 72
Sierp Base 72 reserving all k's n=25K-40K
|
1 Attachment(s)
Just for fun, I took the first two Riesel base 40 k's to n=10K with PFGW to see if I could knock them out. Unfortunately, neither of them fell, so here's the results. (Note: no reservation.)
|
Riesel Base 72
Riesel Base 72 - Reserving from n=140K-n=400K
|
Sierp Base 72
Sierp Base 72 complete n=25K-40K
Nothing found - Results attached - Base released |
| All times are UTC. The time now is 23:00. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.