[QUOTE=gd_barnes;473969]I checked it. Everything looks OK to me. I show that there were 47 k's in the sieve file, you found 11 unique k's with primes for n=100K-200K, and there are 36 k's remaining.

The primes file that you sent had 3 primes from duplicate k's. Maybe that was your difference. Attached are the sorted primes file with extra primes removed and the k's remaining file that I am using to show on the pages.[/QUOTE]

That cant be. If Iam checking the sievefile against a empty primes.txt file with srfile its showing me 44k total. There must be something missing.

[QUOTE=rebirther;473979]That cant be. If Iam checking the sievefile against a empty primes.txt file with srfile its showing me 44k total. There must be something missing.[/QUOTE]

Attached are the sieve file for n=100K-200K and the k's remaining at n=100K. I did a compare using two steps: In step 1, I used the sieve file and program srfile. I ran the command "srfile -g" to create a separate sieve file for each k. In step 2, I compared every k in the k's remaining file with each file name created in step 1 (the srfile -g command creates a separate file for each k with the k-value in the file name). Everything was identical. There are 47 k's in the sieve file and they all match what was in the k's remaining file.

As per the previous post, there are 11 unique k's in your primes file leaving 36 k's remaining, which are also attached in the previous post.

Here's what I might ask you to do: Compare the k's remaining in the n=100K-200K sieve file that you loaded into your server to the attached k's remaining at n=100K file. See if there are 47 k's in each and that they all match what is in the remaining file. I'm wondering if you somehow got a bad sieve file or if something went amiss in your processing.

If your sieve file does not match mine, please attach the one that you have and let me know which k's are missing from it. If there is something wrong with it, I'd like to see if I can figure out something on this end of things.

I sent you an email with the file grabbed from the CRUS table.

[QUOTE=rebirther;473981]I sent you an email with the file grabbed from the CRUS table.[/QUOTE]

See my response.

For public info: We have determined that the 3 smallest k's for R91 n=100K-200K were not tested by BOINC. Therefore I have sent Reb a sieve file with just those 3 k's in them and asked that BOINC test them.

[QUOTE=gd_barnes;473982]See my response.

For public info: We have determined that the 3 smallest k's for R91 n=100K-200K were not tested by BOINC. Therefore I have sent Reb a sieve file with just those 3 k's in them and asked that BOINC test them.[/QUOTE]

Reserving R91 to n=200k (100-200k) for BOINC (3k's)

S91 tested to n=200k (100-200k)

4 primes found, 17 remain

6970*91^103568+1
65158*91^128927+1
49656*91^144447+1
12306*91^194666+1

Results emailed, Base released

[QUOTE=rebirther;474073]Reserving R91 to n=200k (100-200k) for BOINC (3k's)[/QUOTE]

R91 tested to n=200k (100-200k) (3k's)

1 prime found, 35 remain

5544*91^146013-1

Results emailed, Base released

Do you have a status update on R63?

[QUOTE=rogue;474691]Do you have a status update on R63?[/QUOTE]

Its nearly done, maybe tomorrow.

R63 tested to n=25k (15-25k) (160.9205M-168.633M)

2520 primes found, 7480k left in this range

Results emailed, Base released

This is a new milestone now. All ranges were tested up to 25k.

[QUOTE=rebirther;474777]R63 tested to n=25k (15-25k) (160.92M-168.63M)

2520 primes found, 7480k left in this range

Results emailed, Base released

This is a new milestone now. All ranges were tested up to 25k.[/QUOTE]

Yay!