![]() |
LLR/PRP/phrot/pfgw:- Pick A Range
Reservations available - the files may be found [URL="http://mersenneforum.org/base5/"]here[/URL]. We'll see how this goes...
[B]LLR: Pick a Range[/B] This thread is meant for you to reserve ranges for probable primality testing (LLR/PRP). Please send results files (with residues) to base5 DOT factors AT yahoo DOT com. [B]Riesel Candidates[/B] [URL="http://mersenneforum.org/base5/prpnet.prp"]prpnet.prp[/URL] approx 1600 candidates completed by PRPNET [URL="http://mersenneforum.org/base5/prpnet.prp.2"]prpnet.prp.2[/URL] approx 5800 candidates reserved by PRPNET [B]Sierpinski Candidates[/B] [URL="http://mersenneforum.org/base5/exps4"]exps4[/URL] approx 435 candidates reserved by masser [B]Primes[/B] [code] 71098*5^319336+1 rogue 287626*5^277175-1 Free-DC Mercenaries [/code] Note: -- messages posted on this thread can be deleted without notice, during the cleaning process. [B]Questions[/B] [QUOTE=em99010pepe;139054]Can I post here the results or do I have to send them by email?[/QUOTE] It should not be a problem if you link to the results files here. I would prefer email, but leave it up to you. [QUOTE=Rincewind;154546]Hi, what's this "section" about? I sieved some Factors and are finishing some PRP/LLRs, but, what is the content of the linked files? Is this somethin like doubletesting?[/QUOTE] This thread is for those people that don't have networked machines but still want to test candidate pairs for primality. Also, as noted elsewhere, there are alternative (and faster) testing clients to LLRNET, such as phrot, LLR, PRP and pfgw. |
Stickied Reservation
I stickied the thread AND I am reserving exps4.
|
Hi,
is there any new work for this section expected? |
Yes, but my inbox for my day job is a little full right now. Please be patient with us.
|
Manual testing
Hi, its me again *g*
if I want to test a certain K-value manualy, is it correct if I use [code] sr5sieve -a k n-min n-max [/code] to get my workfile? And send the results to the e-mail adresse in the first post? If it is correct, which n-min value should I use? "min n untested", "max n tested"? |
1 Attachment(s)
Here is prpnet.prp.2 result file
Lennart |
OK, I created a file for k = 126134, Nmin= 330949 and Nmax 2000000
[code] sr5sieve -g 126134 330949 2000000 [/code] renamed the generated file to "expr" and started phrot with [code] phrot.3-linxu.static -0 expr [/code] is this correct? (any answers please) |
[QUOTE=Rincewind;186352]OK, I created a file for k = 126134, Nmin= 330949 and Nmax 2000000
[code] sr5sieve -g 126134 330949 2000000 [/code] renamed the generated file to "expr" and started phrot with [code] phrot.3-linxu.static -0 expr [/code] is this correct? (any answers please)[/QUOTE] If you run phrot without any switches it will tell you what is available. Of course it is also in the readme. I suspect that you want to use -o, not -0. |
errr ... yeah, I meant "o" not "0". Sorry.
Thanks for the answer. |
| All times are UTC. The time now is 16:16. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.