Taking 792 to 794 aswell (To avoid another collison, i know a friend just registered and has started scanning 794-796)

McDuck

mcduck
 

Thanks for your reply. I'll mark 790-794 reserved by you.

You can find LLR Linux clients here:
[url]http://www.mersenne.org/gimps/[/url]

The latest version is 3.7.1c

Happy hunting!

i'm scanning [URL="http://kosmaj.sakura.ne.jp/rps/rps6/794to796.txt"]794to796[/URL] now

cheers
anyweb

hi i'm new here but i'd like to help

i'm currently scanning 794 to 796

cheers
anyweb

mcduck and anyweb,


Welcome aboard and good luck. I'm sure a Moderator will sign on and note the 794 to 796 reservation within the next hours.

782-784 complete, no primes.

Taking 796-798.

676 to 678 complete, no primes.
-Curtis

[QUOTE=mcduck;141154]If Thomas is working on the same range, I will move on to the next one.
[/QUOTE]

Welcome to RPS, mcduck, and good luck for your search on primes!

Sorry for the late reply on our double reservation, but I haven't checked the forum during the weekend. Since you already moved to a new range, I'll keep running 788-790.

BTW.: It seems that your Q6600 is slightly faster than mine (also running Vista 64), as my tests take 700-710 secs each. But that's for all four cores running LLR...

Cheers,

Thomas

784-786 complete, no primes.

Taking 798-800.

I just added 10 more test files, to 820k.

[quote=Thomas11;141375]Welcome to RPS, mcduck, and good luck for your search on primes!

...

BTW.: It seems that your Q6600 is slightly faster than mine (also running Vista 64), as my tests take 700-710 secs each. But that's for all four cores running LLR...

Thomas[/quote]


Thank you :>

The tests i posted was while only running on one core. I'm now running on three cores and each test is taking about 715 secs. I'm using the computer very activly, so i need one core available ;>

Also, I notice that the tests i'm running on AMD hardware (Sempron 3100 (1.8ghz) is taking alot longer than one might expect (intel 2.4ghz - 715 sec/test vs amd 1.8ghz, 2010 sec/test). Any reason for this, or could it be the fact i'm running linux on the amd hardware (I noticed very little difference from windows to linux on intel hardware)?

McDuck