[QUOTE=Mini-Geek;181008][url]http://www.mersenne.org/report_LL/?exp_lo=18000000&exp_hi=21000000&exp_date=&user_only=0&user_id=&exdchk=1&exbad=1&exfactor=1&txt=1&dispdate=1&B1=Get+LL+data[/url]
From 18000989 to 18297089, a jump of 296100. 18297089 has had two unmatching, non-suspect LLs run. Most of that list is the same scenario.[/QUOTE]

That is what I was looking for. Very impressive. And after two further exponents, it jumps to 18,444,733. Not bad at all!

18000989 95% done

[QUOTE=starrynte;181935]18000989 95% done[/QUOTE]

Excellent news :smile:. This has you being done tomorrow? I cannot wait to see the big jump in DCs...

[quote=Primeinator;181975]This has you being done tomorrow?[/quote]
Yes, unless it finishes unusually quickly tonight

[QUOTE=starrynte;181997]Yes, unless it finishes unusually quickly tonight[/QUOTE]

That brings us close to:

Countdown to testing all exponents below M(30402457) once: 85
Countdown to testing all exponents below M(32582657) once: 406
Countdown to testing all exponents below M(37156667) once: 1,169

and

Countdown to proving M(20996011) is the 40th Mersenne Prime: 512

All very close! After that...the milestones are no longer so close.

Edit: It also looks like only 17 more exponents before all below 19M have been double checked.

M18000989 finished :D

[QUOTE=starrynte;182119]M18000989 finished :D[/QUOTE]

All exponents below 18,297,089 have been tested and double-checked.

:banana:

All my assignments in the 25M - 30M range are now complete (as of the 1st)!!!

25 more in the 31-33 range completing in the next 2.5 months.

I am no longer actively seeking low LL assignments.

Just over 500 to go!!!!!!!
 

503 as of right now....though we are slowing down.
263 completed since July 1 (just under 8 per day).
But even at this rate 500 could take as little as 2 months.

I still have about 5%; all over 31M now and expected to complete by mid October.

[CODE]Million LL-ERR No-LL Total LL-ERR No-LL Total Jan. LL-ERR No-LL Total Feb. LL-ERR No-LL Total Mar. LL-ERR No-LL Total Jn-8 LL-ERR No-LL Total Au-4
18000000 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
21000000 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0
23000000 8 13 21 6 8 14 7 2 2 12 1 1 1 0 1 0 0
24000000 25 4 29 25 3 28 1 4 4 24 0 4 0 0 0 0
25000000 10 27 37 3 26 29 8 1 20 21 8 1 1 20 0 1 0 0
26000000 24 44 68 16 39 55 13 8 34 42 13 1 14 15 27 3 3 12 1 1 2
27000000 53 79 132 39 72 111 21 32 60 92 19 13 23 36 56 1 5 6 30 1 2 3 3
28000000 133 337 470 124 326 450 20 79 240 319 131 44 155 199 120 15 62 77 122 11 38 49 28
29000000 159 259 418 155 236 391 27 136 182 318 73 57 67 124 194 22 20 42 82 4 7 11 31
30000000 196 546 742 183 538 721 21 172 512 684 37 147 446 593 91 18 143 161 432 6 57 63 98
31000000 268 1050 1318 255 1027 1282 36 247 993 1240 42 221 870 1091 149 40 218 258 833 16 105 121 137
32000000 321 1240 1561 310 1210 1520 41 293 1164 1457 63 262 1055 1317 140 66 353 419 898 28 183 211 208
33000000 92 528 620 91 490 581 39 90 461 551 30 77 415 492 59 17 116 133 359 8 36 44 89
TOTALS 1292 4127 5419 1209 3975 5184 235 1066 3666 4732 452 824 3046 3870 862 179 920 1099 2771 74 429 503 596[/CODE]

I just have one exponent left that should be finishing within a week.

As we get closer to the end, if it's not too much work, it might be nice to have slightly more frequent updates (maybe every 1-3 weeks instead of every month). It would give a better idea of how quickly things are trailing off. Also, once there's fewer exponents left, we might want to start keeping track of them to possibly identify stragglers (and maybe prod them along, if it can be done in a polite manner). Unless nobody especially cares that much anymore, in which case, just ignore the above paragraph.

[quote=Kevin;187594]As we get closer to the end, if it's not too much work, it might be nice to have slightly more frequent updates (maybe every 1-3 weeks instead of every month). It would give a better idea of how quickly things are trailing off.[/quote]It seems the only reason for that would be your impatience. Why not just let them finish? As long as they're making regular progress reports, they'll finish when they finish. Direct your attention elsewhere in the meantime. :-)

[quote]Also, once there's fewer exponents left, we might want to start keeping track of them to possibly identify stragglers[/quote]What's your definition of "straggler"? Any system slower than yours?

[quote](and maybe prod them along,[/quote]... and just what would be the justification for prodding them -- other than to satisfy your impatience?

[quote]if it can be done in a polite manner).[/quote]... for what polite reason? ("I'm impatient for your slower system to finish its assignment" is not a polite reason.)