![]() |
I would like to take k=335 with n of 800K-1M. Thanks. :)
Edited: File sent |
Great work guys. At this rate, we should have all k=300-350 at n=1M within 1-2 months.
Mike, can you check your machines for the status of n=970K-1M on your 6 k's? Let's see if we can target mid-September for completing this drive. That would be excellent! :smile: Gary |
Mid September might be a little early. Some of my k's won't be done till the end of November. I had quite a few high weights k's. I also have K369 running on that real slow AMD. I need to find a new core for that.
The sieve for k301-400 n=1M-2M should be at or near 80T by then, so no need to rush this. |
No problem. Just thought I'd throw out a target to shoot for. It looked like all of yours except k=369 were progressing fast enough to get there by then, even accounting for longer testing times for n>900K.
|
k=349 and 353 complete to n=840K, no primes. ETA for 850K is early July 6.
|
status report on k=311 and 337
Both tested till n=1.59M - I am still working on those, I will release k=311 @ n=1.6M.
|
k=325
n=850K, 2 primes reported.
|
k=325
n is at 875K, no further primes.
|
1 Attachment(s)
k=349 and 353 complete to n=850K, stopping. k=349's results are attached, k=353's results will be attached in following post...(just big enough to not fit in one post when zipped)
Note that these are already in the LLRnet result format, using a combination of Max's conversion script and the LLRnetuser= option, once it came out. I think the changeover between the two was just over n=800K. |
1 Attachment(s)
k=353's results are attached
|
k=311 and 337 tested till n=1.6M, I am releasing 311 and continuing with 337.
|
| All times are UTC. The time now is 05:58. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.