k=319
 

Okay, n>900K, no primes so far.

I don´t know, if there will be another change in FFT-length. If not so and with a little bit of luck (Murphy should stay away) it should be finished up to 1M by the end of june.

MfG
Sven

[QUOTE=Svenie25;175376]Okay, n>900K, no primes so far.

I don´t know, if there will be another change in FFT-length. If not so and with a little bit of luck (Murphy should stay away) it should be finished up to 1M by the end of june.

MfG
Sven[/QUOTE]

Afraid there is another FFT change. At n>919514, the FFT length will change from 57344 to 65536 (64K, 2^16, [url=http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=9851]note that[/url] FFT lengths that are powers of 2 are faster than ones requiring larger factors), which is the last change until above 1M.
I used the fft_len tool found [url=http://www.mersenneforum.org/showpost.php?p=129893&postcount=28]here[/url] to calculate that FFT cutoff.

[quote=Mini-Geek;175384]Afraid there is another FFT change. At n>919514, the FFT length will change from 57344 to 65536 (64K, 2^16, [URL="http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=9851"]note that[/URL] FFT lengths that are powers of 2 are faster than ones requiring larger factors), which is the last change until above 1M.
I used the fft_len tool found [URL="http://www.mersenneforum.org/showpost.php?p=129893&postcount=28"]here[/URL] to calculate that FFT cutoff.[/quote]

Thanks a lot. The utilities are working fine. The only difference is, that the program says, the FFT length will change at n=938514. ;)

k=325, 335, & 347 are at n=740K. Nothing to report.

Since we have the other 6 unreserved k's loaded into port 9000, I'll go ahead and extend my reservation on the above 3 k's to n=800K.

[QUOTE=MooooMoo;173221]
I'm at n=930K for k=313 with no primes found. I'll post the lresults file when it gets to n=950K, which should happen before the end of the month.[/QUOTE]
I'm a bit late, but I've attached the k=313 results from 900K-950K.

Still no primes :sad:

My current status:

k369 ---- Tested to n=714K
k371 ---- Tested to n=898K
k375 ---- Tested to n=786K
k377 ---- Tested to n=824K
k379 ---- Tested to n=899K
k381 ---- Tested to n=810K
k383 ---- Tested to n=877K
k385 ---- Tested to n=877K
k391 ---- Tested to n=809K

k=325, 335, & 347 are all now at n=767K. In ~1 week, all k<350 will be at n=800K. :smile:

Ian,

With the 2nd 6k drive now handing out pairs at n>726K and all pairs processed to n>719K, your k=369 at n=714K is now the lowest searched k of any k < 400. You better put that one on a faster core! :smile:

Seriously, the response to the 2nd 6k drive has been better than expected.


Gary

[QUOTE]With the 2nd 6k drive now handing out pairs at n>726K and all pairs processed to n>719K, your k=369 at n=714K is now the lowest searched k of any k < 400. You better put that one on a faster core! :smile:[/QUOTE]

k=369 may very well be the last one over the finish line. I have it on that balky AMD quad. At least some testing getting done there. LOL

k=319
 

n=925K, still no primes.

But I believe in the 64%-chance. ;)

k=319
 

n=950K, no primes so far.

Looks like the E8500 is very efficiently on LLRing. Also the privatePRPNet server does his part to let the avaiable boxes work together on one task. If Murphy stays away, I could finish the range sometime next week.

For the further work, what is more important: mini-drive or another individual k? I had to say, at the mini-drive I would need 10 files at once, to keep the boxes busily more than two weeks, if it is no problem.