Unreserving 463-464.

Unreserving 425-437.

[quote=em99010pepe;131171]Unreserving 425-437.[/quote]

Anon and David,

This creates a problem for us because we really need to get this filled in and if we load it into the server, I don't want to wait until we're done with 470-490 to do it. I also don't think there is enough interest in manual reservations that people will quickly reserve them. (It's about 7-10 days before I'll be done with my current manual reservations and could start on them.)

IMHO, what makes it important to get this filled in is that there are no known primes in this range unlike most of the n-ranges for k=300-400. It's going to be very easy for someone else to 'pick off' a prime in this range before we find it if we don't make it a priority.

An option that might be easy would be to set up a temporary server just for the range of n=425K-437K only. I'd then move all my port 5000 testers over to that. Today, I dropped back from 7 to 4 cores on it since we passed the missing n=372.8K-400K pairs but I'll increase it back to at least 6 cores to get this new range processed quickly.

Another option might be for me to stop all of my LLRnet port 5000 testers and process this range manually on 6 cores. But my machines are only non-overclocked 2.66 Ghz P4's and so would take me over 2 weeks. It's better if it is a distributed effort so hopefully we could get it done in about a week. But if people think that is too much of a hassle, I'll take the entire range and start on it early Weds. afternoon.


Gary

[quote=gd_barnes;131177]...
An option that might be easy would be to set up a temporary server just for the range of n=425K-437K only...
Gary[/quote]
I can jump onto a different server for a while.:smile:

Sure, I will create a 'cleanup' Server for this.
Give me the port number you want to use and send me the knpairs.

[quote=IronBits;131186]Sure, I will create a 'cleanup' Server for this.
Give me the port number you want to use and send me the knpairs.[/quote]
Okay, how does port 8000 sound? (picked it out of the blue) I'll send you the knpairs when I send you the ones for the upcoming Sierp. base 4 server shortly. :smile:

Knpairs sent to IronBits, and the knpairs for the new port 4 CRUS server. :smile:

[quote=Anonymous;131190]Okay, how does port 8000 sound? (picked it out of the blue) I'll send you the knpairs when I send you the ones for the upcoming Sierp. base 4 server shortly. :smile:[/quote]

To all NPLB searchers,

When David (IronBits) states that he has everything set up for a temporary port 8000 server and loaded the pairs sent to him by Anon, I'd like to request that people currently working on the port 5000 server (and anyone else who would like to help) work on the port 8000 server instead until we run it dry. This was help us quickly fill in the range of n=425K-437K.

The name of the new port 8000 server is nplb.ironbits.net, which is slightly different than the name of the port 5000 server.

After I see that David has everything set up, I'll switch my port 5000 machines over to port 8000.

Anon, if you haven't already done it, I'll add the info. to our LLRnet servers page and remove it when we run it dry.

Thanks for taking the time to set up a temp. server David! :smile:


Gary

No problem, glad to be of some help.

[LEFT][FONT=Verdana][COLOR=#0000ff]crus.ironbits.net port 4[/COLOR][/FONT][/LEFT]
[LEFT][FONT=Verdana][COLOR=#0000ff]nplb.ironbits.net port 8000

I can also setup some web pages where you guys can run your stats if you like.
Just let me know the particulars, send it to me in an email, and I'll do my best to set it up the way you like it.
[/COLOR][/FONT][/LEFT]

373.8K-400K and 440K-455K completed by LLRnet IB5000. :banana: lresults to be sent to Gary shortly. :smile:

Cool! I like progress :smile:

Both CRUS and NPLB Servers have the knpairs report working for each port to.

[quote=IronBits;131270]Cool! I like progress :smile:

Both CRUS and NPLB Servers have the knpairs report working for each port to.[/quote]
Great! :smile:

BTW: one core added to port 8000. I'm planning to keep this core on port 8000 until we run it dry. :smile:

P.S.: I noticed that on the CRUS info page, it says "Sierpinski/Riesel Base 5 Project". Would you mind changing that to "Conjectures 'R Us Project"? (since first of all, none of our servers are doing base 5, and second, we want to avoid confusion with the separate, and unaffiliated, Sierpinski/Riesel Base 5 project.) :smile:

[quote=Anonymous;131267]373.8K-400K and 440K-455K completed by LLRnet IB5000. :banana: lresults to be sent to Gary shortly. :smile:[/quote]


Outstanding! I'll now be able to complete up to n=400K at Primesearch.

Done.
Conjectures 'R Us Project it is. :)

455K-460K completed by LLRnet IB5000, results emailed to Gary. :smile:

[QUOTE=Anonymous;131267]373.8K-400K and 440K-455K completed by LLRnet IB5000. :banana: lresults to be sent to Gary shortly. :smile:[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Anonymous;131452]455K-460K completed by LLRnet IB5000, results emailed to Gary. :smile:[/QUOTE]

as my stats says, there're 8 k/n-pairs missing in the range 454k-456k!
please check, i do that the next hours which ones.

[quote=kar_bon;131457]as my stats says, there're 8 k/n-pairs missing in the range 454k-456k!
please check, i do that the next hours which ones.[/quote]
Are those 8 missing k/n pairs in results that you generated yourself from the LLRnet results files, or that I generated? I know I filled in about 7-8 k/n pairs manually last night when I processed 455-460.

i have Team Drive #3 page updated!

461-463 complete; 1 prime reported

Taking the irritating range of 463-470 with 5 already found primes to entertain a quad while I'm away. :smile: I don't have LLRnet loaded on them yet so reserving manual ranges for now.

437-440 and 460-461 will complete on a friend's machine in 2-3 days.


Gary

424-425 done.

LLRnet IB8000 has completed 425K-437K, lresults emailed to Gary. :smile:

After a bit of a hiatus for business reasons, I'm back on.

437K-440K and 460K-461 complete; no primes.

Those were the only reservations I had running on a friend's machine so I was able to call her to get the status. The rest are probably finishing up about now on my machines at home (I had planned to be back Monday) but I won't be home until Thursday to check them.

Anon, I'll forward you the primes and results on my double-check ranges when I get home.


Gary

408-410 done

412-414 done

Taking 490-491. :smile:

416-418 done
420-422 done

463K-470K complete

1 new prime plus 5 confirmed primes reported

[quote=nuggetprime;129583]New here, but hope that's no problem,taking 423K-424K.

Thanks,
nuggetprime[/quote]

Nugget,

Can you post a status for your 423K-424K range?


Thanks,
Gary

It looks like we should probably fill up the port 5000 server with some more work--right now it's handing out work at ~486.4K, with about 6000 k/n pairs left. Gary, what do you think of taking 491K-511K for the server? (I'm thinking 491K-511K would be better than 495K-515K, so as to keep the smallest gap possible between manual and server reservations--considering the low volume of manual reservations of late.)

[quote=Anonymous;132817]It looks like we should probably fill up the port 5000 server with some more work--right now it's handing out work at ~486.4K, with about 6000 k/n pairs left. Gary, what do you think of taking 491K-511K for the server? (I'm thinking 491K-511K would be better than 495K-515K, so as to keep the smallest gap possible between manual and server reservations--considering the low volume of manual reservations of late.)[/quote]

Fire away. Go ahead and keep the ending range even and send 491K-510K.

Thanks for taking care of that.


Gary

[quote=gd_barnes;132840]Fire away. Go ahead and keep the ending range even and send 491K-510K.

Thanks for taking care of that.


Gary[/quote]
Okay, 491K-510K will be sent to IronBits shortly. Also more files will be posted for Drive #3 (since this range will eat the currently posted files). :smile:

Oh, by the way, just to make it official: Reserving 491K-510K for LLRnet IB5000. :wink:

More files posted--enjoy! :smile:

[quote=gd_barnes;132615]Nugget,

Can you post a status for your 423K-424K range?


Thanks,
Gary[/quote]

Nugget reserved his range on March 24th. I see that he hasn't been on the Mersenneforum since March 29th. I also followed up with a PM 2 days ago. I'll give him about 1 more week to respond. Otherwise I'll put his range up for reservation by others.

It's all that we are lacking on drive 3 for n<480K.


Gary

[quote=gd_barnes;132927]Nugget reserved his range on March 24th. I see that he hasn't been on the Mersenneforum since March 29th. I also followed up with a PM 2 days ago. I'll give him about 1 more week to respond. Otherwise I'll put his range up for reservation by others.

It's all that we are lacking on drive 3 for n<480K.


Gary[/quote]
Maybe if he doesn't respond, we should put it in a special temporary LLRnet server to get it cleaned up ASAP? Or is it too small a range for that, and thus maybe it would be better just to stick it on all four cores of one of your quads, which would get it cleaned up pretty quickly. :wink:

[quote=Anonymous;132930]Maybe if he doesn't respond, we should put it in a special temporary LLRnet server to get it cleaned up ASAP? Or is it too small a range for that, and thus maybe it would be better just to stick it on all four cores of one of your quads, which would get it cleaned up pretty quickly. :wink:[/quote]

Naw, just a manual run on one core would knock it out fast enough.

[quote=gd_barnes;132931]Naw, just a manual run on one core would knock it out fast enough.[/quote]
Okay, that sounds good then. :smile:

I have completed verification of the results files for n=400K-420K for drive 3. I checked primes on post 1 of this thread, the top-5000 site, the Primesearch site, Karsten's NPLB drive 3 page, and the 300<k<2000 page.

There was one new prime that wasn't listed in post 1 of this thread. It is 349*2^416059-1 that was found by Carlos. That has now been added to the post.

Karsten, 349*2^416059-1 is also missing from your NPLB drive 3 page, which is showing completion of all ranges to n=423K. Please adjust any possible scoring inaccuracy also.

The 300<k<2000 page has had it's ranges and primes reported up thru n=400K but has not yet been updated for the 5 new primes for n=400K-420K. I'm sure Karsten will take care of that in the near future.

The Primesearch site is a problem. Problem people there are 'Boogi' and 'Macy'. These people reserve ranges, wait for primes to be reported by other people or projects, and then copy the primes on to the pages as though they found them. This is why we are missing some of our primes there. But in this case I've noticed that almost all of Boogi's ranges are past their expiration date because he reserves far more than he can ever do himself. If I can get Mike Hartley to officially expire them, we could then reserve them, report their primes, and complete them. I'll send Mike a note tomorrow to see if he'll do that.

Further confirming what Boogi and Macy do is that they will frequently reserve a range and complete it without knowing that it has been completed by others, results in ranges reported complete with missing primes. There are numerous instances of this there.

Eventually, we'll get all of Primesearch straightened out.

Once n=423K-424K is complete, I'll verify everything up to n=480K here.


Gary

490K-491K complete, no primes. lresults attached.

I'm putting n=423K-424K back up for individual reservation. With no activity in nearly 2 months, a PM sent and a posting asking for status, both with no response, it's time to get it completed. Here is a link:

[URL="http://gbarnes017.googlepages.com/NPLB-423-424.txt"]423K-424K[/URL]

First come, first served...

Since this is old, please plan to complete it in ~1 week or so.


Thanks,
Gary

[quote=gd_barnes;133333]I'm putting n=423K-424K back up for individual reservation. With no activity in nearly 2 months, a PM sent and a posting asking for status, both with no response, it's time to get it completed. Here is a link:

[URL="http://gbarnes017.googlepages.com/NPLB-423-424.txt"]423K-424K[/URL]

First come, first served...

Since this is old, please plan to complete it in ~1 week or so.


Thanks,
Gary[/quote]


I'll reserve n=423K-424K to get it done. ETA is < 1 week on 1 core.


Gary

n=423K-424K complete; no primes


Anon, can you process the LLRnet results for n=470K-490K for drive 3? Actually, I only need n=470K-480K. I'm going to do all the verification this weekend for n=420K-480K and get everything reported at Primesearch and n=470K-480K is all that I need to finish that.


Thanks,
Gary

[quote=gd_barnes;134163]n=423K-424K complete; no primes


Anon, can you process the LLRnet results for n=470K-490K for drive 3? Actually, I only need n=470K-480K. I'm going to do all the verification this weekend for n=420K-480K and get everything reported at Primesearch and n=470K-480K is all that I need to finish that.


Thanks,
Gary[/quote]
Actually, I'm one step ahead of you on that. :smile: I started working on processing the results for 470K-490K a few days ago (the entire range was complete as far as the server was concerned, which means that if there were any missing k/n pairs, they were truly lost and the server was not going to hand them out again), but found that there were ~730 results that were somehow lost. :sick: Yesterday I finished running those missing results; I'll see about getting them merged in with the rest of the results and processed either tonight or sometime tomorrow. :smile:

LLRnet IB5000 has completed 470K-490K, results emailed to Gary. :smile:

n=420K-480K results confirmed and complete
 

I have verified the n=420K-480K results files and compared them to the primes in post 1 of this thread, the NPLB drive 3 page, the Rieselprime.org page, and the top-5000 site. I have also reported all the ranges complete at Primesearch.

No missing or incorrect primes were found. 6 primes still need to be added to the Rieselprime.org site. The only thing needed on the drive 3 page is to complete the n=423K-424K range that I did. Any missing primes at Primesearch were on k's with open reservations by others.

Attached is a spreadsheet with a list of the primes found and primes that still need to be added to Rieselprime.org. Ranges where n=480K-600K was previously searched can now show complete to n=600K.


Gary

Reserving 510K-530K for LLRnet IB5000. :smile:

Taking 530-534. Let's push the drive up to 600k.

[quote=em99010pepe;135952]Taking 530-534. Let's push the drive up to 600k.[/quote]
Okay, sounds great to me--the sooner we get Drive #3 at 600K, the sooner we can shift our priorities to Drive #1 for the final push to make the goal of 300<k<1001 at 600K by the end of the year! :smile:

Reserving 534K-540K for LLRnet IB5000. :smile:

[quote=Anonymous;136662]Reserving 534K-540K for LLRnet IB5000. :smile:[/quote]

Please move my reservation, 530k-534k, to IB5000 as well. Thanks.

[quote=em99010pepe;136664]Please move my reservation, 530k-534k, to IB5000 as well. Thanks.[/quote]
Oh, okay--I take it you didn't start on that range yet, then?

[quote=Anonymous;136668]Oh, okay--I take it you didn't start on that range yet, then?[/quote]

Correct.

[quote=em99010pepe;136670]Correct.[/quote]
All right, then--knpairs sent to IronBits. :smile:

I have completed a review of the results files for n=480K-520K for drive 3. I compared primes found to post 1 in this thread, Karsten's drive 3 page, Karsten's k=300-2000 page, and the top-5000 site. No problems were found and this drive is now considered complete to n=520K! The only issues that I found were on web pages that are out of date:

Karsten, please add prime 353*2^519312-1 to the drive 3 page and show all ranges completed up through n=520K.

On the k=300-2000 page, please show all k=300-400 as having been searched to n=520K. Many k's are still showing only n=400K so those need to be updated. Also, for k's that show "400K, 480K-600K" having been completed, please show those at n=600K. This drive has filled in the gap. There are many like that.

The exception to the above would be on the individual-k reservations and Curtis's reservations. I see that you have our individual-k reservations ranges updated on the rielesprime.de site. For Curtis's reservations, just use what is on the Primesearch site. I think that's what you've been doing on the latter.

On another note, it has been impossible to access the ranges on the Primesearch site for over a week now. You can view primes but not ranges, which means you can't reserve or complete ranges nor report primes in the ranges. I'll send a note to Michael Hartel to see what is going on.


Gary

Files have been posted again. Come get some! :smile:

Karsten,

Can you update the links to the appropriate 3rd drive page and k=300-2000 page in the 1st post of this thread?


Thanks,
Gary

[QUOTE=gd_barnes;145489]Karsten,

Can you update the links to the appropriate 3rd drive page and k=300-2000 page in the 1st post of this thread?


Thanks,
Gary[/QUOTE]

Done!
have to do this in other posts/threads (or a note there)!

Reserving n=540K-545K for port 5000.

Taking 545-549

By myself I can finish drive 3 in less than 110 days!!!!

Gary, when you get the time can you please prepare me a big chunk, I was thinking of a 20k file. If you want you can send me the 580k-600k range...

[quote=em99010pepe;146275]Gary, when you get the time can you please prepare me a big chunk, I was thinking of a 20k file. If you want you can send me the 580k-600k range...[/quote]

Thanks for the great offer! :smile:

Per your PM, I'm suggesting to send you up to n=560K or an amount of work you could complete in about 6 weeks to keep the ranges processed more contiguous. Let me know what you think.


Gary

Gary,

I prefer to crunch a range away from the current progress. What about 590-600? I'll run it in 4 cores so I think I can manage to finish it in less than 6 weeks.

Carlos

[quote=em99010pepe;146445]Gary,

I prefer to crunch a range away from the current progress. What about 590-600? I'll run it in 4 cores so I think I can manage to finish it in less than 6 weeks.

Carlos[/quote]


OK, check your PM in a few mins. Good luck!


Gary

From last IB5000 server results update and from my manual range Drive 3 will be completed within 60 days. I'll give a more accurate estimation when the IB5000 output settles because it has been increasing for the last two days.

Reserving n=549K-555K for port 5000.

Anon, can you process the LLRnet results for n=520K-540K for the 3rd drive? I think we're past 3 days from when it started sending out pairs for n>540K so all the pairs should now be there.


Gary

[quote=gd_barnes;146608]Reserving n=549K-555K for port 5000.

Anon, can you process the LLRnet results for n=520K-540K for the 3rd drive? I think we're past 3 days from when it started sending out pairs for n>540K so all the pairs should now be there.


Gary[/quote]
Okay, I'll do that later today after I get back from church. :smile:

Last update IB5000 received 1430 candidates with my ~1000 candidates we did ~2430!!!

Carlos

[quote=em99010pepe;146663]Last update IB5000 received 1430 candidates with my ~1000 candidates we did ~2430!!!

Carlos[/quote]

llrnet+manual output
[URL="http://em99010pepe.googlepages.com/drive3.JPG/drive3-medium;init:.jpg"]
[/URL]

From last three days output (1911, 2430, 2347) we are moving n=1.17k/day.

[quote=em99010pepe;146817]From last three days output (1911, 2430, 2347) we are moving n=1.17k/day.[/quote]


Excellent! Keep up the great work everyone!

[quote=mdettweiler;146620]Okay, I'll do that later today after I get back from church. :smile:[/quote]

Are you back from church yet? lol Nudge, nudge. :smile:

Meanwhile: reserving n=555K-560K for port 5000. Thanks David for the large recent contribution on this server! We're smoking right along now. :smile:


Gary

Add work up to 580k, I suspect more cores will be added very soon.
I still have 3 days to finish 545-549 and then 20 days to complete 590-600. At this pace I will sure have to free up part on my last reservation range...thinking...I have 590-592.5 for core 0, 592.5-595 for core 1, etc...maybe I will have to rearrange the work to be more easy to free the ranges for llrnet server.

[quote=em99010pepe;147069]Add work up to 580k, I suspect more cores will be added very soon.
I still have 3 days to finish 545-549 and then 20 days to complete 590-600. At this pace I will sure have to free up part on my last reservation range...thinking...I have 590-592.5 for core 0, 592.5-595 for core 1, etc...maybe I will have to rearrange the work to be more easy to free the ranges for llrnet server.[/quote]


Up to 560K already sent. I'll keep an eye on the processing rate each day. If at any time, it looks like the current range remaining will be less than 3-4 days, I'll send another file; perhaps an n=10K or 20K range next time depending on the rate.

[quote=gd_barnes;147066]Are you back from church yet? lol Nudge, nudge. :smile:[/quote]
Whoops--sorry about that. I'll process those results as soon as I've finished catching up with the forum just now; I'm going to write myself a PM to make sure that I don't forget. :smile:

Our progress:

Average of last 5 days - 1.38k/day
Average of last 2 days - 1.70k/day

Can we make 2k/day?

Carlos

520K-540K complete, lresults sent to Gary. :smile:

Due to a recent influx of resources that have apparently been added to LLRnet IB5000, I'm going to go ahead and reserve 560K-570K for it. By my calculations that should last us about 3 or 4 days. :showoff:

At this rate, we may be able to finish the 3rd Drive in less than two weeks! :w00t:

P.S.: Thanks for the boost, Lennart! Glad to have you back! :grin:

Once again I say to add work up to 580k or even up to 590k.

Gary, I just rearranged the 590k-600k range and I will be doing firstly from 596-600. This means that in case you be without work to feed the server you can add 590-596.

[quote=mdettweiler;147200]Due to a recent influx of resources that have apparently been added to LLRnet IB5000, I'm going to go ahead and reserve 560K-570K for it. By my calculations that should last us about 3 or 4 days. :showoff:

At this rate, we may be able to finish the 3rd Drive in less than two weeks! :w00t:

P.S.: Thanks for the boost, Lennart! Glad to have you back! :grin:[/quote]


Holy smoly! I'm glad you sent it. Perhaps we can go ahead and load up to n=580K or 590K sometime Thursday if Lennart stays for a while.

Thanks for adding your mean machines Lennart! :-)


Gary

[quote=em99010pepe;147220]Gary, I just rearranged the 590k-600k range and I will be doing firstly from 596-600. This means that in case you be without work to feed the server you can add 590-596.[/quote]


OK, thanks Carlos. Good thinking. If we near completing thru n=590K and you haven't completed 596K-600K, I'll do that. If needed, you can always then reserve something from the 1st drive or run pairs from your port 443.


Gary

Let's bet when will Drive #3 be completed.
My date is 29th of November 2008.

Gary, I think it's urgent to feed the server up to 590k.

Carlos

[quote=gd_barnes;147222]Holy smoly! I'm glad you sent it. Perhaps we can go ahead and load up to n=580K or 590K sometime Thursday if Lennart stays for a while.

Thanks for adding your mean machines Lennart! :-)


Gary[/quote]

Sorry I can't stay that long. I have lots of sieving todo.


I will try do get to 555000

/Lennart

[quote=Lennart;147232]Sorry I can't stay that long. I have lots of sieving todo.


I will try do get to 555000

/Lennart[/quote]


I have stoped now. Off to sieve again. :smile:

/Lennart

[quote=Lennart;147315]I have stoped now. Off to sieve again. :smile:

/Lennart[/quote]
Okay, thanks for the big boost! :grin:

Max :smile:

[quote=Lennart;147315]I have stoped now. Off to sieve again. :smile:

/Lennart[/quote]


And a second thanks from me for the big boost Lennart!

I noticed that Lennart held on until n>560K and so I was ready to send all the way up to n=590K to port 5000 if he kept going. But now that he is off of it with the port currently handing out pairs at n=~560.7K and ~17900 pairs remaining, it looks like it would take > 10 days to get to n=570K assuming current resources.

So there's now a good amount of work in port 5000. A little later tonight, I'll post some manual files for n=570K-580K.

Carlos, reference the PM that you sent me about moving my machines to port 5000, I want to get the 1st drive up to n=540K, which it will be shortly (currently handing out n=539.9K), and then fill in the gap there below Mini-Geek's range on your port 443. After that, likely within a week or so, I'll move those 5 quads plus perhaps a 6th that is not currently working to this drive to get it finished up so that we can concentrate on getting the 1st drive completed around year end.


Gary

The results files for n=520K-540K have now been processed and verified. Primes were checked against post 1 of this thread, the 3rd drive web page, the k=300-2000 web page, and the top-5000 site. No problems were found.

Karsten, you can now update all k=300-400 that are currently at n=520K to n=540K at Rieselprime.org.

With port 5000 already handing pairs out for n>560K, in 3 days, we should be able to process all LLRnet results for n=540K-545K & 549K-560K. Then it'll just be up to Carlos to finish the n=545K-549K manual range to fully complete n=540K-560K. :smile:

Nice work everyone!


Gary

545-549 is almost done, 93.17% completed, 516 candidates to test, ETA ~12 hours.

Lennart, you sieve too much...lol..thank you for your help.

BTW, IB5000 must be down because Free-DC forum is down too.

[quote=em99010pepe;147387]BTW, IB5000 must be down because Free-DC forum is down too.[/quote]
Yes, I confirm that on my end--the nplb.ironbits.net page is down too.

Server C443 is up...Death is already there.

I just heard from David--the servers are back up again (he thinks it might have been an ISP issue of some kind, since none of the server stuff went down on his end). I confirm that they all work on my end, too. :smile:

We need more power in here. Thank you.
Soon I'll be starting 596-600. Gary, if you want you can send 570-596 to IB's server. After ending my ranges I'll run llrnet.
Come on guys, let's finish this drive.

Carlos

EDIT: Strange, how come IB5000 jumped from 555k to 560k? Please look at the results file. Maybe this happened because the work added was not sorted by n range.

[quote=em99010pepe;147414]We need more power in here. Thank you.
EDIT: Strange, how come IB5000 jumped from 555k to 560k? Please look at the results file. Maybe this happened because the work added was not sorted by n range.[/quote]


Darn; I didn't see that had happened. They were sorted correctly but 2 different files were sent; one by me and one by Max. I sent David 555k to 560k before Max sent the 560k to 570k range to him but he must have loaded them in out of order. I sent an Email to him verifying that he does, in fact, have 555k to 560k loaded in after 560k to 570k. David, if you can verify that is what happened, you don't need to change anything.

So much for my prior statement about us almost being done with the 540k to 560k range. It'll be a while now as we'll have to wait until 560k to 570k is complete.

In the long run, I suppose it makes no diff. so not a big deal.

Carlos, once I move my 5 quads to this drive in ~3-4 days (per my PM to you), I'll send 570k to 590k to David.

Edit: Due to the above issue, I created separate reserved ranges for port 5000 in post 1 of this drive; one each for n=549k-555k, 555k-560k, & 560k-570k. Max, in < 3 days, you should be able to process the n=540k-545k & 549k-555k results to me. Since Carlos will be done with 545k-549k by then, we'll at least be able to show completed thru n=555k.


Gary

I changed my mind. (lol) I just now realized there wasn't a testing gap on the 1st drive so I'm now moving my 5 quads to port 5000.

Now reserving n=570K-590K for port 5000.

All files have now been handed out on this drive. :smile:


Gary

545-549 done, 1 confirmed prime.

[url=http://em99010pepe.googlepages.com/lresults_NPLB-545-549.zip]lresults_NPLB-545-549[/url]

I'm doing now 596-600. Time per candidate increased by 11 % so this range will take me ~8 days to finish. Then I expect to start 592-596.

Our progress:

Average of last 5 days - 3.64k/day
Average of last 3 days - 4.40k/day

This will reduce because we lost Lennart despite that we are moving fast.