I have divided the remaining files up into n=1K pieces and tweaked all instruction wording in the first post of this thread accordingly.

Karsten, this means that the n=1K pieces are beginning at n=422K instead of n=430K. Sorry for the oddball starting point for them but the files were becoming very large for this n-range.


Gary

Taking 423K-424K
 

New here, but hope that's no problem,taking 423K-424K.

Thanks,
nuggetprime

[quote=nuggetprime;129583]New here, but hope that's no problem,taking 423K-424K.

Thanks,
nuggetprime[/quote]
Welcome to No Prime Left Behind! :smile:

[quote=nuggetprime;129583]New here, but hope that's no problem,taking 423K-424K.

Thanks,
nuggetprime[/quote]

Hi Nuggetprime. Welcome to the effort. If there are any questions, people are very helpful here.


Gary

I've processed the results for Beyond's ranges 280K-320K and 321K-340K (they were originally in LLRnet format). lresults emailed to Gary. :smile:

Taking 424-425.

[quote=em99010pepe;129952]Taking 424-425.[/quote]

n=20K just wasn't quite the right size for testing so he goes for n=21K instead.

LMAO

:grin:

Please add the list of k's we are searching on the first post. Thanks.

Taking 425-437 (12 files)

3 machines freeing up from manual reservations on drive 1 tomorrow; I'll put 2 ranges on each...

Reserving 437-440 and 460-463.

I'll post manual reservation files from 463-470 late today.

Carlos, can you clarify your request to add the 'list of k's'?

[quote=gd_barnes;130275]

Carlos, can you clarify your request to add the 'list of k's'?[/quote]

Which k's between 300<k<400 are we looking for some primes?

301, 305, 307, 309, 311, 313, 315, etc...