ECM for CUDA GPUs in latest GMPECM ?
Greetings.
While working on gmpecm, I discovered a "gpu" folder inside latest svn. Can somebody shed some light on it? Is it a fullyworking gmpecm implementation ? Or partially gpuaccelerated ? Any info will do! 
[QUOTE=Karl M Johnson;287461]Greetings.
While working on gmpecm, I discovered a "gpu" folder inside latest svn. Can somebody shed some light on it? Is it a fullyworking gmpecm implementation ? Or partially gpuaccelerated ? Any info will do![/QUOTE]I'm playing with it. Not yet found a new factor with it. Current activity is to work out what's going on and then to see whether I can contribute to the effort. So far I've found areas where I may be able to help Cyril with development. So far, it is Stage 1 only (as one should expect) and each bit in the product of prime powers up to B1 requires a separate kernel call. It would be easy enough to make the entire sequence of elliptic curve arithmetic operations a single kernel but not obviously a good idea (think about it). The code currently uses fixed kilobit arithmetic and so is limited to factoring integers somewhat under that size. One of the areas I may be able to help is to add flexibility in that regard. Another is improve the underlying arithmetic primitives. A third is to reduce the (presently extortionate IMO) amount of cpu time used by busywaiting for the kernels to complete. Paul 
Oh, alright.
It cant substitute gmpecm yet. Stage2 on GPUs is not very possible(except Teslas) because it requires a lot of RAM ? 
[QUOTE=Karl M Johnson;287497]Oh, alright.
It cant substitute gmpecm yet.[/QUOTE]Actually it can. I just found my first factor with gpuecm :surprised:[code] Resuming ECM residue saved by pcl@anubis.home.brnikat.com with GPUECM 0.1 Input number is 27199999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 (275 digits) Using B1=1100000000, B2=110000000776278396540, polynomial Dickson(30), A=112777948379516601562499999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999998 Step 1 took 0ms Step 2 took 176954ms ********** Factor found in step 2: 7219650603145651593481420276356225303436099 Found probable prime factor of 43 digits: 7219650603145651593481420276356225303436099 Composite cofactor 3767495339476507669490528975999036413199084363632138583182977316467718682572689799651214383863597597569613063674073098348731470273762390945944125050829513627232967008803673015815350396060271580465332444072090424114938478394067646101 has 232 digits[/code] A total of 1792 curves were run at B1=110M and the factor found on the 1349th second stage. I'm running the remainder in case another factor can be found. Each stage one took 70 seconds on a GTX460. The latest ECM takes 679 seconds per stage 1 on a single core of a 1090T clocked at 3264MHz, so the GPU version is close to 10 times faster in this situation. Paul 
GPU ECM 0.1
Could anybody provide a (link to a) (Windows 64) binary for GPUECM 0.1?

[QUOTE=xilman;288906]Actually it can. I just found my first factor with gpuecm[/QUOTE]Surprise is no longer adequate, and I'm forced to resort to astonishment :shock:[code]
Using B1=1100000000, B2=110000000776278396540, polynomial Dickson(30), A=113233923912048339843749999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999998 Step 1 took 0ms Step 2 took 176408ms ********** Factor found in step 2: 2315784840580190375316972295830305082761 Found probable prime factor of 40 digits: 2315784840580190375316972295830305082761 Composite cofactor 11745478044145667127387304121681137574169838448099828222193156280305822325912582394902125137121744003039884215185197839759773264126893037178852537820600462333360764644042755609744438099938488940900666235577910910744169710591419476281159 has 236 digits[/code] took another 18 curves. If I was unlucky not to find the p43 earlier than this, given the amount of ECM work performed, I was especially unlucky not to find the p40. The candidate number, GW(10,272) had no previously known factors despite having had a complete t40 run through the ECMNET server here and clients around the world. The cofactor is now c193 so it's worth seeing whether the remaining curves will find anything. Paul 
[QUOTE=Brain;288909]Could anybody provide a (link to a) (Windows 64) binary for GPUECM 0.1?[/QUOTE]Not me.

[QUOTE=xilman;288913]Not me.[/QUOTE]
And for linux?:bow: 
[QUOTE=pinhodecarlos;288914]And for linux?:bow:[/QUOTE]If you have Linux you can build from the SVN sources as easily as I can.
The process really is very straightforward and you'll end up with something which doesn't carry the risk of the Linux equivalent of DLLhell. If you really are not lazy(*) enough to build your own, I could make available the binary I use. No guarantees that it will work, or even run, on any other Linux system. It almost certainly won't work optimally unless you have exactly the same environment as me. Paul * Sometimes it's much better to do some work ahead of time to remove the need to do much more work later. That's true laziness. 
Windows binary wanted:smile:

[QUOTE=xilman;288906]Actually it can. I just found my first factor with gpuecm :surprised:[code]
Resuming ECM residue saved by pcl@anubis.home.brnikat.com with GPUECM 0.1 Input number is 27199999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 (275 digits) Using B1=1100000000, B2=110000000776278396540, polynomial Dickson(30), A=112777948379516601562499999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999998 Step 1 took 0ms Step 2 took 176954ms ********** Factor found in step 2: 7219650603145651593481420276356225303436099 Found probable prime factor of 43 digits: 7219650603145651593481420276356225303436099 Composite cofactor 3767495339476507669490528975999036413199084363632138583182977316467718682572689799651214383863597597569613063674073098348731470273762390945944125050829513627232967008803673015815350396060271580465332444072090424114938478394067646101 has 232 digits[/code] A total of 1792 curves were run at B1=110M and the factor found on the 1349th second stage. I'm running the remainder in case another factor can be found. Each stage one took 70 seconds on a GTX460. The latest ECM takes 679 seconds per stage 1 on a single core of a 1090T clocked at 3264MHz, so the GPU version is close to 10 times faster in this situation. Paul[/QUOTE] Awesome. Is the code specific to a particular GPU? How portable is it? 
All times are UTC. The time now is 18:46. 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000  2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.