status report
 

k=337 tested till n=3.01M

k=309 tested until n=1.07M
k=313 tested until n=1.09M
k=317 tested until n=1.09M
k=319 tested until n=1.08M

I would like to extend my ranges to 1.2M. Thanks.

k=325 n=1000K-1100K completed. No primes found.

Status report
 

k=337 tested till n=3.06M

k=309 tested until n=1.10M
k=313 tested until n=1.12M
k=317 tested until n=1.13M
k=319 tested until n=1.11M

Status report
 

k=337 tested till n=3.12M

k=309 tested until n=1.13M
k=313 tested until n=1.16M
k=317 tested until n=1.17M
k=319 tested until n=1.14M

status report
 

k=337 tested till n=3.23M

I've complete the following two to the exact n specified and will not be continuing them. Results for both are uploaded.
k=313 tested until n=1 202 547
k=317 tested until n=1 209 600

I will be continuing with the last 2:
k=309 tested until n=1.17M
k=319 tested until n=1.19M

status report
 

k=337 tested till n=3.28M

status report
 

k=337 tested till n=3.37M

status report
 

k=337 tested till n=3.43M

k=309 tested until n=1.24M
k=319 tested until n=1.27M

[QUOTE=gamer007;275427]k=309 tested until n=1.24M
k=319 tested until n=1.27M[/QUOTE]

You are past your original reservation of n=1M-1.2M. Do you know what range you plan to test?

[QUOTE=gd_barnes;275489]You are past your original reservation of n=1M-1.2M. Do you know what range you plan to test?[/QUOTE]

I'll finish at n=1.3M for both k's.

Can I reserve k=309 for up to 2M?

[QUOTE=BiBi;275573]Can I reserve k=309 for up to 2M?[/QUOTE]

Yes you can. Gamer007 has it reserved up to n=1.3M but you can reserve it for n=1.3M-2M.

Let us know if that sounds good to you and if so, one of the admins will send the file to you.


Gary

[QUOTE=gd_barnes;275640]Yes you can. Gamer007 has it reserved up to n=1.3M but you can reserve it for n=1.3M-2M.

Let us know if that sounds good to you and if so, one of the admins will send the file to you.

Gary[/QUOTE]
It sounds good, but what about the file, is that a file with candidates left after sieving? Normally I sieve myself, that should save some sieve time.

[QUOTE=BiBi;275642]It sounds good, but what about the file, is that a file with candidates left after sieving? Normally I sieve myself, that should save some sieve time.[/QUOTE]

Bibi,

We have a highly sieved file from PrimeGrid. You do not need to sieve.

Max or Karsten,

Please send Bibi the latest sieve file for k=309 for n=1.3M-2M.


Thanks,
Gary

[QUOTE=gd_barnes;275643]Please send Bibi the latest sieve file for k=309 for n=1.3M-2M.
[/QUOTE]

Just done by PM.

For port 3500 n=1.5M-1.7M, only k=315 was errorneously loaded instead of 6 k's. n>1.59M has now been corrected. Later tonight, I will correct n=1.5M-1.59M. Additionally, I have gone ahead and loaded all n<=2M in port 3500.

[QUOTE=gd_barnes;276202]... n>1.59M has now been corrected. Later tonight, I will correct n=1.5M-1.59M...[/QUOTE]
Not sure what you mean but I came down to find everything running from 1.5m.

[QUOTE=gd_barnes;276202]For port 3500 n=1.5M-1.7M, only k=315 was errorneously loaded instead of 6 k's.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Flatlander;276254]Not sure what you mean but I came down to find everything running from 1.5m.[/QUOTE]

The above part of my response means that we only loaded k=315 for n=1.5M-1.7M. We missed loading the other 5 k's. They've now been loaded. We had processed only k=315 up to n~1.59M before the problem was found. That is why port 3500 "stepped back" to n=1.5M. If you check the results on your clients, you'll see only k=315 for several days. That is why all of a sudden, we appeared to be blowing through the n-ranges so fast. It was unrealistic. Don't worry, there is no duplication of work. I was careful not to include any k=315 pairs in the range where they had already been processed.

For clarification, all candidates n<=1.59M including k=315 and all of the others are with the "old" sieve file that was sieved to P=1405T (1.4P). All candidates n>1.59M are with the new sieve file sieved to P=100000T (100P). So you won't see an increase in processing rate until we get all k's up to n=1.59M. See the news thread for the n-range cutoff where the new file starts on all servers.


Gary

I'm glad I don't get to sort this stuff out!

Thought they must be all super-low-weights ... I just run the software.

status report
 

k=337 tested till n=3.48M

k=309 tested until n=1.27M.
k=319 completed up to n=1.3M. No primes.

Status report
 

k=337 tested till n=3.54M

k=309 tested from 1.30M up to 1.44M

[QUOTE=BiBi;280700]k=309 tested from 1.30M up to 1.44M[/QUOTE]

Thanks for the update.

k=309 completed up to n=1.3M. No primes.

Releasing k=323 with no status or update for an extended period.

Status report
 

k=337 tested till n=3.59M

Can I get k=323 and k= 307 ??


Lennart

Edit: Sent, I hope. Let me know via PM if you didn't get them. I may have the wrong email. Ian

Best wishes for 2012
k=309 tested up to n=1.49M

k 307
 

k 307 done to 2M No primes

Lennart

status report
 

k=337 tested till n=3.64M

k=309 tested up to n=1.52M

k=323 is at 1.2M Adding some more core on now.

Lennart

Status report
 

k=337 tested till n=3.7M

I removed the sieve files from the 1st post here. They were hopelessly out of date vs. the latest files deep sieved by PrimeGrid. If you need a sieve file and don't know where to get it from PrimeGrid, contact us and we'll send it to you.

status
 

k=309 completed upto n=1.6 M

k=323 is at 1.8M countinue to 2M

Lennart

k=323 done to 2M

No primes


Lennart

Status report
 

k=337 tested till n=3.75M

status
 

k=309 tested until n=1.64M

Status report
 

k=337 tested till n=3.8M

Status report
 

k=337 tested till n=3.84M

Status report
 

k=337 tested till n=3.9M

Status report
 

k=337 tested till n=3.99M

Reserving k=301, 305, 313, 317, 325, 329, 331, and 335 to n=1.3M.

[QUOTE=gd_barnes;312704]Reserving k=301, 305, 313, 317, 325, 329, and 331 to n=1.3M.[/QUOTE]
k=303 and k=305 already completed by me to n=2M, k=301 completed to n=1.5M. I've sent results to you in April, didn't you receive them?

[QUOTE=unconnected;312707]k=303 and k=305 already completed by me to n=2M, k=301 completed to n=1.5M. I've sent results to you in April, didn't you receive them?[/QUOTE]

I PM'd you 3 times. You never responded so I figured you disappered. I only got results for k=303 to n=1.5M. If someone disappears, we have to doublecheck.

Regardless, thanks for responding now. I'll go ahead and mark them complete.

Edit: I think there was a couple of CRUS bases that I finally released too.

Edit2: The PM's were sent in Nov. & Dec. 2011 and Mar. 2012.

[QUOTE=unconnected;312707]k=303 and k=305 already completed by me to n=2M, k=301 completed to n=1.5M. [/QUOTE]

Next time please post your efforts here, so I'm able to update my pages, too. Thanks.

Status report
 

k=337 tested till n=4.04M

k=309 tested upto n=1749545

k=313, 317, 325, 329, 331, and 335 are complete to n=1.3M. No new primes found. :-( [2 primes were expected.]

k=301 and 305 were double-checked to n=1.3M. One prime confirmed.

All k=300 to 340 are now at n>=1.3M. :-)

Reserving k=373 to n=2M

status report
 

k=337 tested till n=4.08M

Reserving k=341 from 1.0M to 1.3M.

Reserving k=343 from 1.0M to 1.5M.

Lennart

[QUOTE=Lennart;318956]Reserving k=343 from 1.0M to 1.5M.

Lennart[/QUOTE]

Reserving k=343 from 1.5M to 1.7M.

Lennart

K=343 done to 1.7M

1 Prime found

Lennart

k=337 tested till n=4.12M

k=373
 

k=373 at 1.4M - nothing found

continuing

k=363
 

Taking k=363 to 2M

k=373
 

k=373 tested 1M-2M

1 prime previously reported

Results emailed

Does anyone know how long we have to complete a pair on the 6k mini drive?

Edit: Nevermind, It's 7 days. I found it on the server admin page.

Any thoughts on what to load into the 6k mini drive next? Looks like we have < 30 days left to finish those 6 k's.

My suggestion is to take any k not started (15) of them plus the 2 k's sitting at 1.02M (357 & 375), and load then to 1.3M (in n order). This should keep them ahead of the Prime Grid juggernaut. They will test considerably faster @ 1M than 2M. This would get all k's to at least 1.3M.

I have the latest sieve files so I can build this new knpairs file if this is what we want to do.

Changing my reservation on k=363 to 1.3M from 2M. I can then move those cores to Port 3500.

That sounds like a good idea to me.

[QUOTE]That sounds like a good idea to me. [/QUOTE]Having heard no objections I'll go ahead and build the knpairs file for the mini drive. I guess we will have to call it the maxi drive now. LOL

Reserving the following k's to 1.3M:

347, 351, 355, 357, 359, 361, 365, 367, 369, 371, 375, 377,
379, 381, 383, 385, 387

To make it official: I have now loaded the 17 k's previously mentioned into port 3500 for n=1M-1.3M.

The 17k maxi drive will commence upon the completion of the 6k mini drive to n=2M. At the time of this posting, the mini drive is currently at n=1.976M so it shouldn't be too long before the maxi drive starts.

Happy hunting! :smile:

status report
 

k=337 tested till n=4.2M

Looks like the 6k mini drive is complete. Nice job all.:victor:

The 17k maxi drive is now in progress.

k363 tested 1M-1.3M - nothing found

Results emailed

k389
 

Taking k389 to 2M

Taking k=331 from n=1.3M to 2.0M

k=341 from n=1.0M to 1.3M done. Results sent.

I've included a page for the Maxi Drive (17 k-values) on my homepage.
See menu 'NPLB -> Mini-Drives'.

I've also finished the page for the Mini Drive #4.

status report
 

k=337 tested till n=4.23M

k397
 

Reserving k397 1.3M-2M

Look like we have about 2 months left on the maxi drive.
The logical thing to do next is the rest of those 17k's to 2M.
Any other suggestions? If not, I'll create the file to load.:question:

[QUOTE=MyDogBuster;332208]Look like we have about 2 months left on the maxi drive.
The logical thing to do next is the rest of those 17k's to 2M.
Any other suggestions? If not, I'll create the file to load.:question:[/QUOTE]

2 months? You sure? We're already over 1/3rd of the way complete with it. Anyway, let's hold off until we get closer before making a decision. n=1.3M-2M is far more work than n=1M-1.3M. We might want to include fewer (or even more) k's.

[QUOTE]2 months? You sure? We're already over 1/3rd of the way complete with it. Anyway, let's hold off until we get closer before making a decision. n=1.3M-2M is far more work than n=1M-1.3M. We might want to include fewer (or even more) k's. [/QUOTE]

I'm assuming the tests will slow down some. By loading the rest of the maxi, you wouldn't have to worry about it again for the rest of the year. But, I'll do what ever the majority wants.

k389 tested 1.3M-2M - nothing found

Results emailed - k released

Reserving k=301 1.5M-2M

Lennart

[QUOTE=Lennart;335606]Reserving k=301 1.5M-2M

Lennart[/QUOTE]

This is already done by me.

[QUOTE=unconnected;335607]This is already done by me.[/QUOTE]

Oh sorry.

Lennart

EDIT: Could someone update that on the first post :)

Reserving k=313 1.3M-1.5M

Lennart

[QUOTE] Originally Posted by [B]Lennart[/B]
[I]Reserving k=301 1.5M-2M

Lennart[/I]

unconnected
This is already done by me. [/QUOTE]

I can find no reference to k=301 being complete to 2M. Maybe Gary knows more. I'll leave it as is until Gary weighs in.

[QUOTE=MyDogBuster;335614]I can find no reference to k=301 being complete to 2M. Maybe Gary knows more. I'll leave it as is until Gary weighs in.[/QUOTE]


Thats ok. Thanks.


Lennart

[QUOTE=unconnected;312707]k=303 and k=305 already completed by me to n=2M, k=301 completed to n=1.5M. I've sent results to you in April, didn't you receive them?[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Lennart;335606]Reserving k=301 1.5M-2M

Lennart[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=unconnected;335607]This is already done by me.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Lennart;335609]Oh sorry.

Lennart

EDIT: Could someone update that on the first post :)[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=MyDogBuster;335614]I can find no reference to k=301 being complete to 2M. Maybe Gary knows more. I'll leave it as is until Gary weighs in.[/QUOTE]

Dmitry,

According to the above post, k=301 is not complete to n=2M. We had a problem contacting you to get results. If you want to send me the results for n=1.5M-2M, then I'll update the first post accordingly to avoid future confusion. Otherwise from our perspective, it has not been done.

Gary

Gary, I've sent link to the results via PM. Sorry for the inconvenience.

[QUOTE=unconnected;335630]Gary, I've sent link to the results via PM. Sorry for the inconvenience.[/QUOTE]

Thanks Dimitry! To make it official: Results for k=301 n=1.5M-2M have been received. The k is now complete to n=2M. :smile:

[QUOTE=Lennart;335612]Reserving k=313 1.3M-1.5M

Lennart[/QUOTE]


Reserving k=313 1.5M-2M

Lennart

status report
 

k=337 tested till n=4.27M

K 313 done to 2M

2 primes found


Lennart

k395
 

k395 reserved 1.3M-2M

Taking k=343 1.7M-2M

Lennart