![]() |
[QUOTE=petrw1;602329]If you don't get a better offer to help someone you can have 18.8M. I was going to do it when I get home next week but I have other options.
Thanks[/QUOTE] Thanks, I will start 18.8M now that 16.3M is finished. I will work from the bottom up. If anyone wants to work on the top of the range, just post a message here (or PM), so we can coordinate. |
[QUOTE=LaurV;602490]:chappy:
Yarrr!! [URL="https://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=17052247&full=1"] This factor[/URL] is noteworthy from at least two reasons, and those are not considering its 129 bits size... First, it [URL="https://www.mersenne.ca/exponent/17052247"]was missed[/URL] by the first (anon) run. Then, it was found in stage 1. Ha! I bet the anon guy is now banging their head against the wall... :razz:[/QUOTE] Hmmm, but almost 20 years later. :razz: |
[QUOTE=masser;602497]Thanks, I will start 18.8M now that 16.3M is finished. I will work from the bottom up. If anyone wants to work on the top of the range, just post a message here (or PM), so we can coordinate.[/QUOTE]
There are only two factors missing in my range 14.1M. If you want, I can reserve the range 18.85M to 18.9M. |
[QUOTE=alpertron;602510]There are only two factors missing in my range 14.1M. If you want, I can reserve the range 18.85M to 18.9M.[/QUOTE]
You might want to clarify with masser. I think this is what he means by "bottom". |
[QUOTE=alpertron;602510]There are only two factors missing in my range 14.1M. If you want, I can reserve the range 18.85M to 18.9M.[/QUOTE]
That works for me. I'm starting with 18.80M, then 18.81M,etc. I'll stop at 18.85M. |
[QUOTE=masser;602524]That works for me. I'm starting with 18.80M, then 18.81M,etc. I'll stop at 18.85M.[/QUOTE]
Ok. I will start as soon the range 14.1M is complete. |
[QUOTE=axn;602135]Can we simplify the twok table by collapsing all the 1M sub-tables into a single big one with just one header and one "Totals"?[/QUOTE]
[URL="https://www.gpu72.com/twok/"]Done.[/URL] Nicely fits on one page now. |
[QUOTE=chalsall;602540][URL="https://www.gpu72.com/twok/"]Done.[/URL]
Nicely fits on one page now.[/QUOTE] :tu: |
Less than 500 factors remaining
Less than 20 ranges remaining
|
This will be my penultimate status update.
Now that I'm back home...
My next and last update will be when the project is 100% complete. I am expecting that to be about mid April. Ranges completed since the last update (mid January) .... too many to list ... all I can says is WOW!!! There are only 15 ranges remaining and all are in progress. Over 97% of the total ranges are cleared. 3,291 factors since the last update Over 99% of the total factors required have been found. Less than 400 to go. Me personally: My GPUS are factoring where help is most needed. My 5 CPUs are nearing completion of my last 4 ranges. I expect it will be about 2 more weeks. The other remaining ranges should be mostly done or near done by then, but once I am finished I may ask if anyone needs a little help to finish. ========= Then I'll be moving on to the follow-on project mentioned here about a week ago. More details to follow in a few days as several of you have run out of work here... and if you are interesting in the next project I feel the need to provide a little more clarity. @Chris is nearing completion of a status table similar the that which he provides for this project. :w00t::w00t::w00t::w00t::w00t: |
[QUOTE=petrw1;602773]My next and last update will be when the project is 100% complete.
I am expecting that to be about mid April.[/QUOTE] With my current procedure (hitting 7.8M with [I]really[/I] high bounds), I will take likely longer. What do you suggest:[LIST][*]Giving up my high bounds and prefer clearing the range?[*]Proceed as is?[*]Since my stage 1 is currently a lot more efficient: provide save files such that other can help with my high bounds?[/LIST] Any input/suggestions is/are appreciated! |
All times are UTC. The time now is 23:15. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.