![]() |
[QUOTE=rebirther;620876]This was a card from a user, Iam trying to find some results but no one has attached an Intel ARC host yet, still need some tweaking with the server setup.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]no factor for M131174377 from 2^74 to 2^75 [mfakto 0.15pre7-MGW cl_barrett32_76_gs_2] tf(): total time spent: 24m 10.213s (1737.73 GHz-days / day) 08:56:56 (11896): mfakto.exe exited; CPU time 1443.187500[/QUOTE] Result from an Intel ARC 770 on linux on SRBase. |
I haven't checked the forum in a few days and it looks like you guys are really getting into the swing of things with ARC support. Since I have an A750 card if anyone would like me to run tests on it or help out I would be more than happy to help.
A small note: I downloaded mfakto from [URL="https://download.mersenne.ca/mfakto"]here[/URL] but by the looks of things there's a more recently updated repo, so if anyone could provide instructions on how to build that it would be much appreciated, Thanks! |
Does there exist an mfaktc build that will work on Google Colab in either its Ubuntu 18.04 or 20.04 VM incarnations currently, which appear unpredictably, usually 18.04? I'm getting Cudart version discrepancies with 10.0, or glibc / libstdc issues with the cuda 12.0 for linux mmfsktc build, and updating 18.04 does not resolve that issue for mmff so likely won't for mfaktc.
|
[QUOTE=kriesel;622698]Does there exist an mfaktc build that will work on Google Colab in either its Ubuntu 18.04 or 20.04 VM incarnations currently, which appear unpredictably, usually 18.04? I'm getting Cudart version discrepancies with 10.0, or glibc / libstdc issues with the cuda 12.0 for linux mmfsktc build, and updating 18.04 does not resolve that issue for mmff so likely won't for mfaktc.[/QUOTE]
Wrong thread, but I've always had to recompile mfaktc for different versions of CUDA. That being said, it's very quick to compile if nvidia-cuda-dev is installed: even on an old two core/two thread machine it takes less than 15 seconds. |
Please post the device name "gfx1032 (Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.)"
Hello,
The data file said to "Please post the device name "gfx1032 (Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.)"" to this forum. Device name is AMD Radeon RX 6600 Thank you! |
AMD GPU Device Name Update Request AMD V520
WARNING: Unknown GPU name, assuming GCN. Please post the device name "gfx1011:xnack- (Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.)" to [url]http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=15646[/url] to have it added to mfakto. Set GPUType in mfakto.ini to select a GPU type yourself to avoid this warning.
OpenCL device info name gfx1011:xnack- (Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.) device (driver) version OpenCL 2.0 AMD-APP (3417.0) (3417.0 (PAL,LC)) maximum threads per block 1024 maximum threads per grid 1073741824 number of multiprocessors 18 (1152 compute elements) clock rate 555 MHz Automatic parameters threads per grid 0 optimizing kernels for GCN Compiling kernels. GPUSievePrimes (adjusted) 81206 GPUsieve minimum exponent 1037054 Started a simple selftest ... Selftest statistics number of tests 30 successful tests 30 AMD Radeon Pro V520 Graphics Card GPU Architecture: RDNA Compute Units: 36 Peak INT4 Performance: 58.98 TOPs Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance: 14.75 TFLOPs Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance: 7.4 TFLOPs Peak INT8 Performance: 24.94 TOPs Lithography: TSMC 7nm FinFET Stream Processors: 2304 Peak Engine Clock: 1600 MHz Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance: 461 GFLOPs Peak Single Precision Matrix (FP32) Performance: 7.4 TFLOPs Dedicated Memory Size: 8 GB Dedicated Memory Type: HBM2 Memory Interface: 2048-bit Memory Clock: 1000 GHz Peak Memory Bandwidth: Up to 512 GB/s Memory ECC Support: Yes (Full-Chip) GHz-d/day: 640 GPUZ Validation: [url]https://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/details/4393n[/url] CPUZ Validation: [url]https://valid.x86.fr/mj07te[/url] AMD Product Page: [url]https://www.amd.com/en/products/server-accelerators/amd-radeon-pro-v520[/url] I also added it to the HWBOT.org database: [url]https://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/radeon_pro_v520/[/url] |
The mfacto doesn't work properly
The program asked me to post the device name 'gfx90c' to the forum.
Thank you! |
[QUOTE=rebirther;621281]Result from an Intel ARC 770 on linux on SRBase.[/QUOTE]
[quote]no factor for M131174377 from 2^74 to 2^75 [mfakto 0.15pre7-MGW cl_barrett32_76_gs_2] tf(): total time spent: 24m 10.213s (1737.73 GHz-days / day) 08:56:56 (11896): mfakto.exe exited; CPU time 1443.187500[/quote] For anyone curious, the RTX 4090 gets 13,800 GHz-days / day on that particular exponent. [quote]Starting trial factoring M131174377 from 2^74 to 2^75 (29.17 GHz-days) k_min = 72001355612340 k_max = 144002711226740 Using GPU kernel "barrett76_mul32_gs" Date Time | class Pct | time ETA | GHz-d/day Sieve Wait May 28 19:15 | 4619 100.0% | 0.190 n.a. | 13816.24 82485 n.a.% no factor for M131174377 from 2^74 to 2^75 [mfaktc 0.21 barrett76_mul32_gs] tf(): total time spent: 3m 6.573s[/quote] |
All times are UTC. The time now is 17:06. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.