![]() |
Just added 6 more cores w/20 cache set
Too bad the I7 is stuck on sieving till 11 Jan, or I would have tossed it on there to. |
I would like to reserve 4k's to be run on my own llrnet server. Please send the file via PM or email. Thank you.
Carlos |
[quote=IronBits;157346]Just added 6 more cores w/20 cache set
Too bad the I7 is stuck on sieving till 11 Jan, or I would have tossed it on there to.[/quote] if you put your I7 on this at some point i would suggest using hyperthreading as more cores should overall be faster for so low numbers i would guess slow computers wont be that much slower on this drive |
some 2 ct's from me:
- no manual reservations for this drive: the range is small but to handle it (split files, send/receive results, verify completeness, display primes/done ranges in pages) is to heavy to handle - i suggest only to put some 'slower' cpu's on this drive because we need the 'runners' for the higher n-ranges (Drives #5-#7)! - keep the order: ascending k-values and within a k the ascending n-values: it's quite easier for me to update the PrimeDatabase! |
OMG. We have blown away over half the file that I sent already! I think it's already handing out k=1029 or 1031. I only sent up to k=1049.
David, I'm going to sent you a file over 3 times as big. The last file was k=1005-1049. The next one will be k=1051-1199. After that depending on the continued response, I'll send them in k=200 ranges, which will be 4 times as big as first file that I sent you. I'll try to make them last a week. Karsten is right, this drive is better for slower machines but personally, I don't care as long as David's server can handle it. If people want to slay this range quickly, let's do it! Yes, we will have a lot of results to match up but that's no big deal. We'll get it taken care of in good time. Due to the huge response to these low n-ranges, I will keep my cores off of it unless it starts to wane. Max, let's plan on processing the results on 100 k's at a time for this drive; perhaps even 200 k's. Otherwise we'll be doing them about every 1-2 days. lol Gary |
One thing here: It'd almost be better if people move a core or two back to the 5th-6th-7th drives. Not that we mind but it'd be nice to continue finding top-5000 primes too.
Gary |
reserving k=1051-1199 for port 9000
|
[quote=em99010pepe;157354]I would like to reserve 4k's to be run on my own llrnet server. Please send the file via PM or email. Thank you.
Carlos[/quote] Carlos, With the way we are smoking through the ranges, are you sure you want to mess with loading 4 k's into your server? I think it'd be easier if you just stayed connected to port 9000 here. But if you really want them, I'll send you k=1201-1207 within a day. Gary |
Loaded up what you sent me, without a single hiccup when I restarted the server.
Port [B]9000[/B] has 178657 remaining knpairs! knpairs.txt - Size: 2222009 Last Updated: 1/7/2009 7:55:39 AM first k/n pair 1007 189180 last k/n pair 1049 199976 jobMaxTime = 1 * 24 * 3600 -- 1 days prunePeriod = 1 * 1 * 3600 -- hourly |
Backing off 6 cores that I put on before I went to bed to test the server a little more.
If you guys want to toss on a couple more cores, let er rip. edit: ok, 6 cores moved back to port 5000 |
[quote=IronBits;157393]Loaded up what you sent me, without a single hiccup when I restarted the server.
Port [B]9000[/B] has 178657 remaining knpairs! knpairs.txt - Size: 2222009 Last Updated: 1/7/2009 7:55:39 AM first k/n pair 1007 189180 last k/n pair 1049 199976 jobMaxTime = 1 * 24 * 3600 -- 1 days prunePeriod = 1 * 1 * 3600 -- hourly[/quote] I think the daily totals reset when you restarted. :smile: [URL]http://nplb.ironbits.net/progress_9000.html[/URL] |
All times are UTC. The time now is 13:06. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.