![]() |
The Third Megabit Drive
1 Attachment(s)
We are starting the Third Megabit Drive.
The k's on this current drive, as of 30 May 2014, are at level n=1.4M therefore the goal of this drive is to take them up to 2M. Goal can be prior extended. The k's of this drive are: 203, 205, 219, 227, 235, 257, 259 [B]Update (June 03, 2014):[/B] adding k=275 and k=295 to the drive from n=1680k. Range n=1400-1680k for both k added as "batch 2". [B]Update (June 08, 2014):[/B] batch 2 completed. [B]Update (July 09, 2014):[/B] The drive is completed to n=2M. [B] Update (June 16, 2015):[/B] Reopening the drive from n=2M. Please help yourself and happy hunting! :smile: [B]Status[/B] Batch 1 (7 k's to n=1680k and all 9 k's from n=1680k) [CODE] Range of n Tested by Status 1,400,000-1,404,000 - Carlos - Complete 1,404,000-1,408,000 - Trilo - Complete 1,408,000-1,412,000 - Thomas - Complete 1,412,000-1,418,000 - Carlos - Complete 1,418,000-1,450,000 - kracker - Complete 1,450,000-1,720,000 - Batalov - Complete (5 primes) 1,720,000-1,728,000 - Carlos - Complete 1,728,000-1,740,000 - kracker - Complete 1,740,000-1,750,000 - Carlos - Complete 1,750,000-1,800,000 - kracker - Complete 1,800,000-1,820,000 - Carlos - Complete 1,820,000-1,834,000 - Batalov - Complete (2 primes) 1,834,000-1,838,000 - Carlos - Complete 1,838,000-1,854,000 - Batalov - Complete (1 prime) 1,854,000-1,866,000 - Carlos - Complete 1,866,000-2,000,000 - Batalov - Complete 2,000,000-2,003,175 - Carlos - Complete 2,003,176-2,025,000 - Thomas11 - Complete 2,025,000-2,027,970 - Carlos - Complete 2,027,971-2,050,000 - Thomas11 - Complete 2,050,000-2,050,963 - Carlos - Complete 2,050,963-2,060,000 - Curtis - Complete 2,060,000-2,102,000 - Kosmaj - Complete 2,102,000-2,200,000 - gd_barnes - Complete (3 primes) [/CODE]Batch 2 (k=275 and 295 from n=1400k to n=1680k) [CODE] Range of n Tested by Status 1,400,000-1,420,000 - Carlos - Complete 1,420,000-1,680,000 - Batalov - Complete [/CODE][B]Test Files[/B] Extensively sieved by Psieve (the latest sieve file of July 31, 2011) See attachment with candidates from n=2M to 3M (split into 2k blocks, kindly prepared by Carlos). [B]FFT lengths[/B] Up to about n=1820k the 112k FFT will be used. AVX machines will benefit from the intermediate 120k FFT in the n=1850-1960k interval, where non-AVX machines will use the 128k FFT instead. PS (Please attach zipped results naming like TMD_1400to1405.txt.zip and so on) [B]Updated 2021-05-04[/B] Found Primes: 203 [0]: 205 [2]: 1537779, 1666435 219 [1]: 2178673 227 [0]: 235 [3]: 1718787, 1824515, 2163273 257 [2]: 1658254, 2108554 259 [1]: 1695723 275 [1]: 1846390 295 [1]: 1832129 Total: 11 primes (Found primes for 7 out of 9 k's) . |
Hi Carlos
Thanks for starting the drive. I'm busy right now but will join the drive soon. Happy hunting! :smile: |
Taking 1400-1404.
Edit: Fast machines can test a candidate at n=1.4M in 500 seconds or less. Come on guys! |
Sorry for not splitting the input files into chunks but I don't know how to do it automatically. Also as the numbers are very fast to process, on latest Intel processors they can take less than 500 secs, I don't know what is the optimal chunk size for now for this drive, if 2k or 4k or 6k, for a period of 7-10 days of crunching as usual done on the other drives.
Carlos |
Taking 1404 to 1408
|
About automatically splitting the files
I may be able to help you out by automatically splitting the files if you want. Do you need them in splits of 1000 or 2000?
|
I splitted the 1.4-2M input file into 2k blocks (see attachment). Each block contains about 400 test candidates.
The attached ZIP file also contains a file called "url_list.txt" indicating the FFT lengths and percentages (for non-AVX machines). This file is only relevant for Kosmaj when uploading the files to his server... [I]Edit:[/I] Attachment removed. Please use the file in the top post of this thread... |
Taking 1408-1412.
|
Taking 1412-1418.
|
Taking 1418-1430.
|
Hmm... going though them faster than expected, 2k done. Taking 1430-1450. (separate reservation if possible please)
|
Yep, they run fast. My first reservation is 60 % complete and I think from now on until we reach next FFT jump I will start reserving a 10k block per core.
Carlos |
I'm running it at 2600 sec a candidate with 4 cores, my fast computer is working on the 8th drive. I'll have my range done in the next 6 days or so.
|
Taking 1450-1600.
|
[QUOTE=Batalov;374843]Taking 1430-1600.[/QUOTE]
kracker reserved from 1430-1450. |
Ok, then.
Now you know that it is a full-time job to be a "manager" (or a "make-surerer", take your pick) of a drive. Please be fast and update the reservation post fast so that the users are not confused. You have been in the shoes of a user for too long. Now, learn to be an effective manager. ;-) |
[QUOTE=Batalov;374845]Ok, then[/QUOTE]
Now you just need to update first post. kracker reservation was in the middle of a conversation and therefore probably unnoticeable. [QUOTE=Batalov;374845]Now you know that it is a full-time job to be a "manager" (or a "make-surerer", take your pick) of a drive. Please be fast and update the reservation post fast so that the users are not confused. You have been in the shoes of a user for too long. Now, learn to be an effective manager. ;-)[/QUOTE] It is not my fault...I am a simple cruncher not moderator. |
[QUOTE=pinhodecarlos;374846]I am a simple cruncher not moderator.[/QUOTE]
Talk about being confused. Why do you start a drive that you have no intention of managing, then? |
[QUOTE=Batalov;374847]Talk about being confused.
Why do you start a drive that you have no intention of managing, then?[/QUOTE] As many started here by others. Kosmaj gave me permission to start it. Also the current three moderators can handle the work although I think it misses one from side of America's (north and south of America). One is in the UK, other in Japan and the last one in Germany. |
1450-1600 is done.
Carrying on to 1600-1680. Results will be in one file. |
Thank you Batalov for the push.
Meanwhile here are the Nash Weight of the k's: k=203 - NW=1687 k=205 - NW=1351 k=219 - NW=1069 k=227 - NW=2550 k=235 - NW=1241 k=257 - NW=1867 k=259 - NW=1561 Carlos EDIT: Damn, I didn't see the k=275 still in n=1.4M. It should be on this drive too. |
[QUOTE=pinhodecarlos;374933]Thank you Batalov for the push.
Meanwhile here are the Nash Weight of the k's: k=203 - NW=1687 k=205 - NW=1351 k=219 - NW=1069 k=227 - NW=2550 k=235 - NW=1241 k=257 - NW=1867 k=259 - NW=1561 Carlos EDIT: Damn, I didn't see the k=275 still in n=1.4M. It should be on this drive too.[/QUOTE] I can run 275 from 1.4M to 1.6M then we can enter it into the drive past there. |
[QUOTE=Trilo;374936]I can run 275 from 1.4M to 1.6M then we can enter it into the drive past there.[/QUOTE]
The files slitted in 2k blocks were already prepared so I think it is better to run it alone until 2M. How many cores do you have? Do you have the file? |
I will have 4 cores available once my reservation on 1404-1408 is finished. I can get the files from primegrid's sieving files.
|
If you are not going to add it to the drive then I won't test it, but if you want to add it to the drive then I will test it.
|
Let's wait for Kosmaj or Thomas reply.
|
[QUOTE=pinhodecarlos;374941]Let's wait for Kosmaj or Thomas reply.[/QUOTE]
That's fine. 275 has a weight of 1581 so it won't take too long to test. |
[QUOTE=pinhodecarlos;374941]Let's wait for Kosmaj or Thomas reply.[/QUOTE]
I've added k=275 to the input files starting from n=1680k. The ZIP file in the first post of this thread has been replaced and now contains the whole file (rps_M3.txt, n=1680-2000k) as well as the split files (2k blocks). There is also the file for k=275 included (t17_b2_k275.npg, n=1000-2000k) for individual testing the n=1400-1680k range. |
Thomas, k=295 is also stopped at 1.4M. Let's add this one too?
|
[QUOTE=pinhodecarlos;374951]Thomas, k=295 is also stopped at 1.4M. Let's add this one too?[/QUOTE]
Okay, it's been added too. The ranges n=1400-1680k for both k (275 and 295) are open for individual testing. Please post your reservations and results to this thread. |
1 Attachment(s)
1450-1680 is done, 3 primes.
|
1 Attachment(s)
1402-1404 complete, no primes. (7 k's)
|
Taking 275 and 295 from 1400 to 1420.
|
1 Attachment(s)
1400-1402 complete, no primes. (7' k's)
|
Ok, I'll catch up the batch 2 from 1.42 to 1.68.
...and taking 1.68-1.72 (all k) |
1 Attachment(s)
1418-1430 no primes.
|
1 Attachment(s)
[QUOTE=Batalov;374995]Ok, I'll catch up the batch 2 from 1.42 to 1.68.
...and taking 1.68-1.72 (all k)[/QUOTE] Both done and attached. 2 primes. |
Now that the 2 extra k's have been all caught up, I think we should remove the "batch 2" part of the reservations to avoid confusion when Carlos is done with his range.
|
[QUOTE=Trilo;375073]Now that the 2 extra k's have been all caught up, I think we should remove the "batch 2" part of the reservations to avoid confusion.[/QUOTE]
Not yet, I am still doing a little part. More 4 days. |
[QUOTE=pinhodecarlos;375074]Not yet, I am still doing a little part. More 4 days.[/QUOTE]
Yeah just realized you were not done with your reservation and edited my post right as you said this :max: |
My reservation is 25 % complete. The server has 6 cores available that I could use but I don't know if I should. There's no queue work system, work is inserted manually.
|
1 Attachment(s)
1412-1414 complete, no primes. (7' k's)
|
Taking 1720-1728. (9 k's)
|
1 Attachment(s)
1430 to 1450, no primes.
|
1 Attachment(s)
1400-1420 complete, no primes. (2 k's - batch 2)
Maybe clean on first post in order?! |
I was wondering if it isn't better to switch the order of the status progress by putting the batch 2 information in first. Thoughts please?
|
taking 1728 to 1740
|
1 Attachment(s)
1414-1416 complete, no primes. (7 k's)
|
1404-1408 complete, no primes
|
[QUOTE=pinhodecarlos;375348]I was wondering if it isn't better to switch the order of the status progress by putting the batch 2 information in first. Thoughts please?[/QUOTE]
Now that batch 2 is complete, I say we remove it from the list entirely. |
[QUOTE=Trilo;375421]1404-1408 complete, no primes[/QUOTE]
Please attach the results. |
Taking 1740-1750.
|
1 Attachment(s)
1408-1412 complete, no primes.
|
1 Attachment(s)
1728to1740 no primes.
|
taking 1750 to 1800.
|
Taking 1800-1804.
|
1 Attachment(s)
1416-1418 complete, no primes (7 k's)
|
1 Attachment(s)
[QUOTE=pinhodecarlos;375431]Please attach the results.[/QUOTE]
I split it into a few separate files so I have attached them. |
Taking 1804-1806.
|
1 Attachment(s)
1720-1722 complete, no primes.
|
Taking 1806-1810.
|
Candidates left from 1810-2000: 46135.
|
Taking 1810-1814.
|
Taking 1814-1854.
All separate reservations. |
1 Attachment(s)
1804-1806 complete, no primes.
|
1 Attachment(s)
1800-1802 complete, no primes.
|
Taking 1854-1856.
|
1 Attachment(s)
1810-1812 complete, no primes.
Taking 1856-1858. |
1 Attachment(s)
1722-1728 complete, no primes.
|
1 Attachment(s)
1806-1808 complete, no primes.
|
1 Attachment(s)
1812-1814 complete, no primes.
|
Taking 1858-1860.
|
1 Attachment(s)
1740-1750 complete, no primes.
|
Taking 1860-1862.
|
1 Attachment(s)
1802-1804 complete, no primes.
|
1 Attachment(s)
1814-1816 complete, no primes.
|
1 Attachment(s)
[QUOTE=pinhodecarlos;376351]Taking 1854-1856.[/QUOTE]
Done. No primes. |
1 Attachment(s)
1856-1858 complete, no primes.
|
1 Attachment(s)
1808-1810 complete, no primes.
So 1740-1750 is done as well as 1800-1816. |
1 Attachment(s)
1750to1800 no primes.
|
Taking 1862-1864 and 1864-1866. (4 cores)
|
1 Attachment(s)
1858-1860 complete, no primes.
|
1 Attachment(s)
1860-1862 complete, no primes.
Means: [code] 1,800,000-1,816,000 - Carlos - Complete 1,816,000-1,854,000 - Carlos - In Progress 1,854,000-1,856,000 - Carlos - Complete 1,856,000-1,862,000 - Carlos - Complete 1,862,000-1,864,000 - Carlos - In Progress 1,864,000-1,866,000 - Carlos - In Progress [/code] |
1 Attachment(s)
1816-1818 complete, no primes.
|
Taking 1.866-2M
|
1 Attachment(s)
[B]Update (July 04, 2014):[/B] extending drive to 3M.
241689 candidates in the attachment extensively sieved by Psieve (the latest sieve file of July 31, 2011) |
Batalov,
My range 1818-1854 is in progress like this: 1818-1820 in progress 1820-1834 in queue 1834-1838 complete 1838-1854 in queue. 1862-1866 almost complete. Do you want to crunch the ranges in queue? If so please let me know so I can add work from Second Megabit Drive, where I want to concentrate from now on my efforts. Carlos |
No, let's keep it simple, as is.
|
[QUOTE=Batalov;377412]No, let's keep it simple, as is.[/QUOTE]
Thank you and happy crunching! My ranges below 1854 will take at least one month, I am now down to 2 cores at home and so far 10 at work. 1862-1866 will be done within max 2 days, so of the 10 cores more 4 will be down soon, leaving 6 to finish my current SMD reservations. By Monday all 10 cores will complete their jobs. |
Hi Carlsos,
Please consider releasing your second queue (1838-1854), thus speeding up the processing of the first one and giving a chance to others to complete the range of the second queue and the whole Drive to 2M faster. Thanks. |
[QUOTE=Kosmaj;377419]Hi Carlsos,
Please consider releasing your second queue (1838-1854), thus speeding up the processing of the first one and giving a chance to others to complete the range of the second queue and the whole Drive to 2M faster. Thanks.[/QUOTE] I prefer to release both queues. So the board will be look like this [code] 1,750,000-1,800,000 - kracker - Complete 1,800,000-1,818,000 - Carlos - Complete 1,818,000-1,820,000 - Carlos - In progress [B]1,820,000-1,834,000 - Available - Free[/B] 1,834,000-1,838,000 - Carlos - In progress [B]1,838,000-1,854,000 - Available - Free[/B] 1,854,000-1,862,000 - Carlos - Complete 1,862,000-1,864,000 - Carlos - In Progress 1,864,000-1,866,000 - Carlos - In Progress 1,866,000-2,000,000 - Batalov - In Progress [/code]I need an answer, almost midnight here, I want to sleep but before I go I need to reserve a SMD range to one of the cores. |
Releasing the ranges in bold from previous post. I think it will be quicker if done by others rather by only two of my laptop cores. Tomorrow I will publish 1834-1838 results.
Going now to bed. Bye. Carlos |
Thanks!
I just uploaded remaining test files to my server, and added links to them in the first post of the thread. |
1 Attachment(s)
1834-1838 complete, no primes.
|
1 Attachment(s)
1862-1864 complete, no primes.
|
I am going to dedicate one core here one core on SMD.
I ask for some help to help to clean the drive up to 2M. On my laptop each candidate is tested in less than 1200 secs so I suppose with processors with AVX 2.0 it will crunch in less than 900 secs. Within 2 days I will reserve another 2k chunk. Meanwhile 1864-1865 is complete, waiting for 1865-1866 (5 candidates left), and another core down for me. Carlos |
1 Attachment(s)
1864-1866 complete, no primes.
|
All times are UTC. The time now is 08:28. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.