mersenneforum.org

mersenneforum.org (https://www.mersenneforum.org/index.php)
-   Riesel Prime Search (https://www.mersenneforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=59)
-   -   Low weight stats page. (https://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=2934)

storm5510 2020-02-12 14:26

[QUOTE=Happy5214;537403]Its Nash weight is 1261, which puts it a bit above what is generally considered low-weight (<1000).

I'll add that all k's between 10k and 100k have been fully tested below n~=1k, and k's between 10k and 15k have been tested to n=20k. The results from those can be found at [URL]https://www.rieselprime.de/Data/10e04a.txt[/URL].

(After reading the next few posts after a page cutoff...)

The old Riesel database is gradually being replaced with [URL]https://www.rieselprime.de/ziki/Riesel_prime_table[/URL], which is in a wiki format. [URL]https://www.mersenneforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=89[/URL] would be a more appropriate place to post low-priority data, or you could apply for a wiki account at [URL]https://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=24141[/URL] to enter the data yourself.

[B]If you're looking for useful work, you may consider filling in gaps in the data for unreserved k's already in the old or new Riesel DB[/B]. Check with [URL]https://github.com/happy5214/rps/[/URL] to make sure you don't overlap with my work in that area. I also am working on the RPS 9th and 10th Drive k's below n=400k, all Woodall and near Woodall k's > 10k, and all k's between 10k and 15k with missing data, all on local PRPNet servers.

[B]Edit: [URL]https://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=7213[/URL] has the Nash weight calculators alluded to by Paul.[/B][/QUOTE]

There are lots of missing [I]k's[/I] in the database. I really do not know how to interpret the Github data. It seems to jump around a lot. If it was in a more strict order, perhaps.

I have been running [I]k[/I] = 6001 for several days. It's "Nash" value is 938. 6001 did not appear in any of the databases. I am approaching [I]n[/I] = 500,000. I was experimenting with Nash on numbers close to what was on my parents mailbox, 3789. 3780 has a Nash value of 4135. 3789's Nash is 2109. There is a second number in the sequence. Sometimes it is higher than the first and other times, it is lower.

[B]VBCurtis[/B] mentioned multiples of 15 were somewhat popular now. Looking at the old database, multiples ending in zero were not there. I was not expecting them to be there.

Unless there is an objection, I will continue with 6001. I was recently "gigged" for not running [I]k's[/I] longer.

storm5510 2020-02-13 00:40

[I]k[/I] = 6001, [I]n[/I] = 500,000 complete.
No additional primes found.
i7 back online. Continuing...

kar_bon 2020-02-13 08:13

[QUOTE=storm5510;537420]6001 did not appear in any of the databases.[/QUOTE]

Sure... Looking at my [url='https://www.rieselprime.de/Data/06000.htm']RPPdB[/url] it was done by [url='https://www.rieselprime.de/FreeDC/Drives/FreeDC_Drive2.htm']FreeDC Drive #2[/url]. See also the Top5000 entry for [url='https://primes.utm.edu/bios/page.php?id=1820']FreeDC[/url].

[QUOTE=storm5510;537420]I was experimenting with Nash on numbers close to what was on my parents mailbox, 3789. 3780 has a Nash value of 4135. 3789's Nash is 2109.
[...]
[B]VBCurtis[/B] mentioned multiples of 15 were somewhat popular now. Looking at the old [/QUOTE]

There're no k-values ending in 0 or even values at all, because only the normalized form of Riesel numbers k*2^n-1 are searched for.
So 3780*2^n-1 is the same as 945*2^(n+2)-1, therefore k=945 is searched here instead.

storm5510 2020-02-13 13:33

[QUOTE=kar_bon;537487]Sure... Looking at my [URL="https://www.rieselprime.de/Data/06000.htm"]RPPdB[/URL] it was done by [URL="https://www.rieselprime.de/FreeDC/Drives/FreeDC_Drive2.htm"]FreeDC Drive #2[/URL]. See also the Top5000 entry for [URL="https://primes.utm.edu/bios/page.php?id=1820"]FreeDC[/URL]....[/QUOTE]

I started 6001 where it left off, 25,789, even though it said it had been tested to 50,000.This is in the Riesel and Proth Database, [URL="https://www.rieselprime.de/default.htm"]https://www.rieselprime.de/default.htm.[/URL] Your first link above seems to be the same. It is an excellent reference despite not being updated now.

kar_bon 2020-02-13 22:24

As Happy5214 said, I'm working on building the Wiki now for holding those data and all history editable for every registered user. The RPPDb was too much for updating by myself, so I hope others will edit the Wiki: Reservations can be done there or own results updated by themselves.
There is still much work to do, not everything is available right now. I just finished to upload the data for Riesel numbers k*2^n-1 for k<300 today with most data of RPPDb but still without history and missing newer primes.

storm5510 2020-02-14 02:36

[QUOTE=kar_bon;537533]...The RPPDb was too much for updating by myself, so I hope others will edit the Wiki: Reservations can be done there or own results updated by themselves.[/QUOTE]

I used to have a Wiki user ID, but it has been years and I have no idea what it was now. Some pages do not require a user ID to edit. What is the address?

I really do not care for running blind, and would much rather have a list to choose from. This way, anyone going there can see what all the others are running and go from there.

kar_bon 2020-02-14 07:19

[QUOTE=storm5510;537538]Some pages do not require a user ID to edit.[/QUOTE]
No, to edit you have to be registered/logged in, otherwise you only can [B]view[/B] the source of any page.

[QUOTE=storm5510;537538]What is the address?[/QUOTE]
See the answers from Happy 5214.

storm5510 2020-02-14 15:16

[QUOTE=kar_bon;537547]No, to edit you have to be registered/logged in, otherwise you only can [B]view[/B] the source of any page.

See the answers from Happy 5214.[/QUOTE]

I can create another Wiki account if this is what is required, or is this something another person must do?

The new database looks good. It seems quite abbreviated. I can understand that. Reproducing all the data from the old database would be a huge task.

storm5510 2020-02-15 00:40

[I]k[/I] = 6001, [I]n[/I] = 700,000 complete.
No additional primes found.
Continuing.

storm5510 2020-02-15 14:57

[I]k[/I] = 6001, [I]n[/I] = 770,000 complete.
No additional primes found.
Stopping.

[B]Abandon in peace.[/B]

storm5510 2020-03-01 12:44

Reserving [I]k[/I] = 22783, Nash= [U]995[/U], on 3/02/2020. I am giving this a day to see if it appears in areas I may not have searched. I found no references. :cat:


All times are UTC. The time now is 22:58.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.