Problem of the Month
Is anyone interested in starting a "problem of the month" thread?
I recently came across a good one: For entire functions, f(z), g(z) and h(z) prove that f^3(z) + g^3(z) = h^3(z) is impossible. 
OMG
[QUOTE=R.D. Silverman;278296]Is anyone interested in starting a "problem of the month" thread?[/QUOTE]
I think my period is coming on. 
Pointless..:missingteeth:

[QUOTE=pinhodecarlos;278300]Pointless..:missingteeth:[/QUOTE]
So mathematics is pointless? Solving math problems is pointless? From an abstract point of view, all of 'pure' math can be considered such. There is an old toast: "Here's to pure mathematics, may it never be of any use to anyone". Further, from this point of view anything that doesn't put a roof over our head or food on the table is pointless. Football is pointless. Mastery of the balance beam is pointless. Poetry is pointless. Fine art is pointless. But my 'pointless' remark was in the context of doing mathematical calculations. [i]Given[/i] that one is going to perform some calculations, which ones should be done? It's too bad that your disdain for reasoning ability does not let you see this. Solving such problems shows that one has mastered mathematical principles and [i]reasoning[/i] and is able to apply them. Which is why, I suppose that you think it is pointless; your prior posts seem to indicate that you worship blind computation instead of reasoning..... 
[QUOTE=R.D. Silverman;278296]Is anyone interested in starting a "problem of the month" thread?[/QUOTE]
Sounds fun, although finding suitable problems is hard. In order not to spoil the fun for the rest of the readers of the forum, a solution should be posted by the person making the question after some time? (Here a month sounds a bit long time...). [QUOTE] I recently came across a good one: For entire functions, f(z), g(z) and h(z) prove that f^3(z) + g^3(z) = h^3(z) is impossible.[/QUOTE] Being clear on notation is another thing. Presumably here you mean that "Prove that for entire functions f, g and h it is impossible to have f^3(z) + g^3(z) = h^3(z) for all z." Also, I do not remember the standard notation in complex analysis, so could you remind me if "f^3(z)" is [TEX]f\circ f \circ f(z)[/TEX] or [TEX]f(z)^3[/TEX]? 
[QUOTE=pinhodecarlos;278300][URL="http://trololololololololololo.com/"]Pointless[/URL]..:missingteeth:[/QUOTE][COLOR="LightBlue"].[/COLOR]

[QUOTE=pinhodecarlos;278300]Pointless..:missingteeth:[/QUOTE]
I sincerely hope that was just another gynocological jest. 
[QUOTE=rajula;278308]Sounds fun, although finding suitable problems is hard. In order not to spoil the fun for the rest of the readers of the forum, a solution should be posted by the person making the question after some time? (Here a month sounds a bit long time...).
Being clear on notation is another thing. Presumably here you mean that "Prove that for entire functions f, g and h it is impossible to have f^3(z) + g^3(z) = h^3(z) for all z." Also, I do not remember the standard notation in complex analysis, so could you remind me if "f^3(z)" is [TEX]f\circ f \circ f(z)[/TEX] or [TEX]f(z)^3[/TEX]?[/QUOTE] Thanks for the comment. I meant (f(z))^3. Show that the equation is impossible to satisfy using entire functions. It is clearly meant for all z. This is the Fermat problem for entire functions. I only have a partial solution as yet. I understand that it was given on an exam for the 1st year grad course in complex variables at Harvard several years ago. OTOH, it might be very hard. When I took this course from Ahlfors he was fond of sometimes inserting very hard or unsolved problems in problem sets........ If you think the problem is too deep for the forum, please say so. 
There seems to be something missing, since f(z)=z, g(z)=2z, h(z)=cuberoot(9)z is a solution. (Or dividing by z throughout, there are lots of nontrivial constant solutions.)

[QUOTE=ZetaFlux;278313]There seems to be something missing, since f(z)=z, g(z)=2z, h(z)=cuberoot(9)z is a solution. (Or dividing by z throughout, there are lots of nontrivial constant solutions.)[/QUOTE]
I just passed on the problem as I heard it. You are indeed correct. I suspect that a requirement for algebraic independence may be part of the problem. Let me check into this.... good catch. There has to me more to it. 
[QUOTE=R.D. Silverman;278315]I just passed on the problem as I heard it. You are indeed correct. I suspect that a requirement for algebraic independence may be part of the problem.
Let me check into this.... good catch. There has to me more to it.[/QUOTE] How about a more elementary problem? For positive integers N that possess a primitive root, prove that the product of all of the primitive roots in Z/NZ* is 1. 
All times are UTC. The time now is 16:33. 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000  2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.